Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter! Celebrate another year with MH and read our yearbook.
Manga News: Check out this week's new manga (8/25/14 - 8/31/14).
Forum News: Visit new sections for Nisekoi and Kingdom!
Translations: Gintama 507 (2)
Kantou: Tezuka against Atobe where Tezuka had his Zone and the Drop Shot used and an broken arm....
PLEASE READ THIS:
The one who said that Kanto's Tezuka was better than Sanada and Ryoma in Tokyo was KONOMI.
When he says that?
In the tonkoban(manga volume) appear the Rikkai interviews, do you remember it?In one of them, Vol.4 just before chapter 224, Sanada VS Ryoma, one reader asks:
"Who would win in a Sanada-Tezuka match?"
Sanada, Jackal and Renji said Sanada, but YUKIMIRA, the best tennis player of the series (Konomi said) says:
"I would say Tezuka,hehe"
So, admit it, Kanto's Sanada WOULD LOSE VS TEZUKA
HERE IS: http://www.onemanga.com/Prince_of_Tennis/223/20/
And it was stated before Ryoma VS Atobe than Ryoma was worse than Tezuka:
They are MANGA EVIDENCES, no OPINIONS like you ahve
Kanto Sanada would win? Maybe...but he sealed two of his techniques, Shadow and lightning in order to beat tezuka...so if they played, he would have unsealed it anyway right?
As for Echizen reaching Tezuka's level, Atobe was referring to "Nationals" Tezuka. The Tezuka that uses PoHW. Atobe would be correct. Echizen did not reached (N)Tezuka at that point yet.
About the A&Q, I think you don't (or you don't want to) understand it well. A reader asks, and Konomi answers. The point is that Konomi prefers than the answers will be answered by their own characters. The other A&Q are the same, the reader asks and Konomi answers (i.ex who get good marks? answer: yagyyu and renji :http://www.onemanga.com/Prince_of_Tennis/233/18/)
And just one thing more: why do you thing Sanada is better than Tezuka, with no doubts? I think they are exactly in the same level, and the match was a prove of it. Both could have won...
This is pretty much my stance on the whole thingQuote:
Winning one match doesn't mean he's better, it's like Saying Ryoma was better than Sanada in Kanto
Not even a match. Its just one damn short set we are talking about. That is nothing. I once lost the first set 1-6 just to beat the hell out of my opponent in set two and three...
Echizen could have been refereed as better than Sanada if he beat him numerous times because he always would overcome him with something (like the Cool Drive). Of course now, since he got Pop, every discussion would be useless.
Listen, it isn't about winning or losing. Tezuka was utterly out-matched. Yukimura himself said it. I don't understand what is so difficult to comprehend about this subject. Sanada defeated every single technique Tezuka had to throw at him. Not only that, Tezuka ended up losing anyway!
That would be like Shiraishi owning Fuji 5-0 like he did,
Fuji creates counters, gets 4 games;
Shiraishi overcomes them and wins 6-4 anyway.
Now, had this happened, WHO in their right mind would say "Fuji is still better" or "They are even." Whoever would take this situation and say that, please raise your hand.
Nope, as Sanada still had those combination shot. He returned the Zero-Serve at match point.
And: IF Tezuka had a better arm, then maybe Sanada would still be better IF he had more than 2 elements hidden... this whole if thing leads to nothing.
It's true that you can lose bad in the first set and then win big in the next few, but for people who know they're playing a one set match, they'll have to go all out from the start.
Ryoma jogs from Tokyo to Kanagawa on foot then plays Kirihara.
None of them ever look really tired unless the match was grueling.