OK, because I'm tired of reading this...I'm going to attempt to use logic to explain this to you.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-153-4/...apter-148.html
Here we see the window. The window has a specific shape, correct? You can see the flesh around it.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-153-6/...apter-148.html
Here we see Jiraiya
DIRECTLY refuting your claim. He states that the wall of flesh was surely torn apart by them.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-153-7/...apter-148.html
Here we see the hole formed by Amaterasu. It's not the same shape as the window, and we see the flames on the flesh.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-153-8/...apter-148.html
Here we see Jiraiya state AGAIN that the flesh was burned.
http://www.mangareader.net/93-153-9/...apter-148.html
Here we see the burn marks on the flesh.
Amaterasu has never been stated to have a range limitation. It was simply "it ignites whatever the user is looking at" I find it hard to believe that Sasuke wouldn't see a freaking summon. When he attacked Bee, he wasn't right up on Bee, they were running away from him and Suigetsu had been fighting him off to give them time to escape.
If he could summon Manda, place him under genjutsu, and escape within him from Deidara's explosion while only taking the damage he took, it's not a stretch to say that he could place Bunta under genjutsu, especially since Bunta isn't going to instantly take to the air and begin attacking.
Links above. You can see the differences in shapes between the window and the hole in the wall. At this point, you have to be trolling.
Not sure what you're saying, but no, Amaterasu doesn't instantly burn into nothingness whatever it ignites. It takes time to burn, yes, but it eventually consumes all. That's why the Samurai had to have their armor removed, that's why the Raikage chose to chop off his arm, and that's why Bee was in pain in the first place. Obviously, depending on what it is, it takes more or less time to completely consume it, this is only logical.
Did you just go from saying that it didn't burn the flesh at all to it "partially burned" the flesh? At any rate, the pics above already show that the shapes aren't the same; considering we saw the flames on the flesh, AND Jiraiya stated that the flesh was burned, I don't see why you're still arguing this point..