
Originally Posted by
Deadbear
Because neither of them are Kenichi's masters and are thus un-informed about his true abilities. From your own example, Agaard registers surprise at what Kenichi can do so he incorrectly labels him as disciple class. And Akira didn't really call him a disciple class. He called him a disciple. In a way he may have been taking a pot-shot at Sakaki's honor by bringing Kenichi to a Master battle.
You'd have a point if we were talking about someone who was master-class garbage, but that isn't the case here. You're point about Aagard is completely off. Aagard had already seen Kenichi one-shot a fighter with Korui Nuki prior to Kenichi using it on Koukin and had watched Kenichi intensely during his fight (e.g. He comments on Kenichi strictly using Muay Thai). Aagard is also noted to be a very competent teacher. Aagard would have a very,
very good idea of what Kenichi was capable of. Him stating Kenichi's display of power to be disciple-class would have a strong basis. His assessment would only be off if Kenichi was still holding back a considerable amount of power during the fight, and the author has made no hint whatsoever that was the case. (Kenichi's reluctance to use his full strength at the start of fights is one of the key reasons Koukin defeated him in Round 1.)
Akira is a nearly identical case. He saw a glimpse of Kenichi's true strength when his desire to protect Miu brought out his full strength to such an extent that Kenichi greatly miscalculated for both opponents. He even states later to both of his students who have been described as being "disciple-class" in strength only lost because of the difference in experience (e.g. this indicates that differences in stats such as power are miniscule factoring in other factors such as Kenichi noting the strength behind their attacks).

Quote:
Find me an instance in which one of the masters of Ryozanpaku calling Kenichi disciple-class and I'd be more willing to agree with you.
I just gave you two examples of fighters who know what they're speaking about and you immediately dismissed their assessments as irrelevent. Let me ask you a question - Where is the evidence supporting your suggestion? Why is it that 70 chapters after their assessment that we're seeing statements (and
feats!) that contradict said assessment? Not even Sakaki disagreed with Akira when he lectured him about bringing Disiciple-class fighters onto the battlefield.

Quote:
In any event, Matsuenya also said that Kenichi is just beginning to enter into the ranks of the expert-class and we have till yet seen a strong example of an expert-class martial artist (other than Tanaka who is an expert becoming a master-class so you really can't use him). So until Kenichi and others progress further the experts as a class are harder to define.
Kenichi is either Expert-class or he is Disciple-class. Not both at the same time, and the evidence that he is above Disciple-class at this point is still lacking. He still has trouble with Disciple-class fighters, got pwned by a fodder swordsman who was only described as being a level above Kenichi in strength, and we have 2 Supermasters stating him to still be Disciple-class. The level of strength he has displayed so far is still comparable to other fighters such as Shou.

Quote:
And is there any chance we can get back on topic? Disciple or expert doesn't really matter here except as how it relates to the Miu vs Kenichi match up.
This is probably going to turn into a "We'll just agree to disagree" at this rate.