Let me explain what I was saying.
What I was saying is that PHYSICALLY speaking you can animate virtually ANYTHING.
If you can VISUALIZE it you can DRAW it.
If you can DRAW it you can ANIMATE it.
What I am disagreeing with is that stuff can't be included DUE to the change in MEDIUM.
That's not to say change in medium doesn't have any affect. The fact the characters are animated is a change.
But that's not we're are talking about and nobody is complaining about that. It's that actual story content is omitted.
Now even though you can PHYSICALLY animate anything you DRAW.
There is still the BUSINESS SIDE OF ANIMATION (as well as the business side of manga).
The reason stuff is omitted is because of the business side though it can also be artistic license.
In other words the omissions are there because they WANT them to be there. Or at least they didn't want them there enough to be there.
I'm not simplifying things. Animation is a business. A business is meant to make a profit. I never said Madhouse is greedy. But business is business.
So again what is bothering me is people acting as if it is the actual CHANGE IN MEDIUM that is the reason why story content is missing
instead of realizing that the reason why the omissions are there either due to BUSINESS reasons or DIRECTORIAL reasons.
It's not that I don't get how much hard work goes into animation but if the chef burns your food will you be satisfied?
Of course I don't think Madhouse has burned the food. But it's the best analogy I can come up with right now.
Another thing, while I do want an adaptation that gets everything I DON'T necessarily think that it needs to get every dot and tittle.
If they can get say the same thing but shorten it then GREAT. I can dig it. And I've said NUMEROUS times before that I like GOOD
fillers provided they don't mess with the show or story. People here seem to think that I'm some sort of manga accuracy nazi.
But really I'm not asking for anything Madhouse hasn't already done. I DID give Episode 51 a 9 out of 10 rating and I've said that
my complaints on omissions were NOT directed to THAT episode. Really it's Madhouse's Yorknew Arc in general I'm complaining about.
Now of course the previous arcs were not 100% accurate but anyone who has been paying attention should be able to see that
Yorknew is MORE liberal in it's adaptation than the previous arcs. I'm not asking for the impossible. I just won't settle for Madhouse's less
than best and this IS less than their best and I know this because I've seen better from them. We've ALL seen better from them.
But again at the same time that doesn't mean I'm appreciative. If I thought the episodes were bad I would NOT give them a 9 out of 10 rating.
But again in case you forgot while reading this my issue is people saying the changes are due to the change in medium rather than business or directorial reasons.
Why does this bother me? Because saying they didn't include this or that due to the change in medium is a lazy argument and to me sounds like
"Shut up and be thankful for what you got." And while I AM thankful (despite my complaints) I notice that people aren't so "thankful" for what
Nippon gave us. I was disappointed by Nippon. But when Madhouse falls off the mark I'm not going to ignore it just because it's Madhouse.
And I think it's fine if you want to like Madhouse's version just because or if you want to like Nippon's version just because.
But when you say Nippon version was bad because of X and when Madhouse does X you ignore it (you here doesn't refer to anyone specifically.)
Well I don't think that's fair. So I'm trying not to be unfair. Yes I have extremely high standards but I at least apply them to BOTH series.