Lol. I hadn't noticed this thread until now. This really is a good thread to teach new cleaners a decent way to start re-drawing and turn out decent results, and it incorporates some of the methods that I used to use before I got my tablet. That being said, I still have some qualms about some parts of it.
The first thing I want to comment on is your use of cloning in the first part. Here you have made one of the biggest mistakes that I see new people make when they're using the clone stamp tool and the layer copy method. That mistake being that, while you may have payed attention to correct gradients and such, you have completely neglected the actual pattern.
like I've pointed out here:
As you can see here it is painstakingly obvious where your cloning is as opposed to the actual pattern because of the constant repetition. One of the tell tale signs that you've made this mistake is because of the constant appearance of the same row of pixels, or the pattern moved via the layer copy method does not mesh with the original pattern.
As I'm pointing out here:
Unfortunately, this is a problem that's all too common with new people not familiar with the tools and methods being used, such as the cloning method you describe. One of the easiest solutions to this problem for the cloning method you describe is just to watch where you're making your selection with the pen tool. Try to make it so what your selection is always over the columns of the pattern and not the pattern itself.
What i mean by this is, that if you zoom into any grid type of pattern you will start to see rows and columns of two side by side pixels. These rows and columns create boxes that will have alternating pixels inside them. This is how most grid type patterns are created. If you make your selection from the middle of one of the columns where the two pixels meet then you should, in turn, be able to take your clone layer and move it over any pattern and be able to match it up perfectly with the pattern (of course this is provided that the hue of the pixels stays the same and there's no pattern change.)
Now of course this isn't perfect either. Since you have various little blemishes in every pattern (especially mag raws), if you clone from the same place you will still have some hint of repetition. This is the reason why you should change clone source from time to time.
Now if your clones start to overlap each other and it's difficult to match pixels then this is when the eraser tool comes in. If your problem is that you can't match pixels, then before you start erasing, zoom in close to where you're gonna be erasing (around 500-800 pixels depending on the image, though you could to more if you wanted) and instead of using the eraser tool in the brush setting change it to the pencil setting. This way you can change the size to 1px and erase individual pixels, unlike the brush tool, which will also start erasing the pixels surrounding its focus point.
I myself have stopped using this method and use the clone stamp tool for every pattern clone I do now (since I have a tablet and it makes everything go much faster.

) Though I still keep the pattern in mind, and will start cloning from the corresponding pixel to the exact place where I will be cloning to. (I.E. I'll clone from a pixel a few columns away, and make sure it's in the same place as my new starting point for the clone)
It's also generally a good Idea to make your starting point (where you're going to start cloning, not where you're cloning from) for your new clone a pixel or two outside of the text you'll be cloning over. This way you can make sure your pattern will align and match the rest of the image, and you can make sure you're cloning from a place with a similar hue.
I have another thing to comment on but I gotta head to class right now so I'll edit that in later.