Not a member? Register now!
Announcements
Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter!
Manga News: Check out these new manga (7/6/15 - 7/26/15).
New Forums: Visit the new forums for Boku no Hero Academia!
Translations: Bleach 636 by cnet128 , Gintama 552 (2)

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Stark700; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Successful manga will always get haters. Just look at Naruto, World Trigger, and Bleach.
  2. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    You mean BLdlive?
  3. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    I want to say 60-80k range.

    You should make a poll.
  4. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    https://twitter.com/Animeland_mag/status/623633632314265600
  5. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Mago's numbers in its prime are still less than what Bleach is at now.

    At the end of 2010, he said ten more years and at the beginning of 2012 Bleach entered its final arc.
  6. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Arc V is getting a manga
    http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2015-07-16/yu-gi-oh-arc-v-gets-manga-by-naohito-miyoshi/.90538


    Maybe Viz will get it.
  7. Replies
    687
    Views
    84,659

    [Mag Talk] Re: JUMP SQ News and Discussion

    They didn't know what to put in there, so they slapped something together and gave it as a bonus, lol. The double sided poster features TLRD and D Gray Man. The TLRD side looking like an anime promo....
  8. Replies
    687
    Views
    84,659

    [Mag Talk] Re: JUMP SQ News and Discussion

    There are also some congratulatory art pieces from SQ artists for SQ Crown. Some are sketches, some are a bit more with dialogue on them. Nice little extras. Magazine also comes with rough sketches...
  9. Replies
    687
    Views
    84,659

    [Mag Talk] Re: JUMP SQ News and Discussion

    Leaning toward seinen, if I had to say.
  10. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    The dub consistency argument makes less sense because 4kids changed much more than just Zoro across all dubs. They changed Yu-Gi-Oh (Tea, Joey, Tristan) and Shaman King (Len, Morty, Zeke, Trey...
  11. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    I can see with Funimation and DBZ and trying to be consistent with that, but only changing Zoro to Zolo seems to make more sense as something legal.

    Considering this is like, the only character...
  12. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    But then that doesn't explain why no other name was touched. Plenty of 4kids names were changed, but Viz only changed Zoro?
  13. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    You always end up calling Viz a group of incompetents on the basis of this Zoro/Zolo thing because there's no public evidence of a legal issue.

    You should however consider that Viz was careful...
  14. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Wait, what? For starters, you can't automatically apply any random percentage of numbers to that. That's taking things out of context. It clearly states



    That only states 50% of manga and anime...
  15. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Yeah, because no individual publisher ever outright came out and said they were losing this kind of money to this extent because of scanlation
    That number on MAG isn't specific to a publisher, or...
  16. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Considering Mangastream is back, that point pretty much means nothing. I forgot all about OneManga. But still, we still have the biggest aggregators up today and what lawsuits have we ever heard of?...
  17. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    And yet again, there are still no publishers saying they're losing billions or saying they're on the verge of bankruptcy like you claimed. You are operating on way too many assumptions.


    You do...
  18. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    You know that absolutely none of this was ever verified or publicly supported in a publishers' panel right?

    Absolutely zero publishers have claimed massive losses. And again, no publisher has...
  19. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Again, there are no claims of anyone saying they're going bankrupt because of piracy. Even in panels, they do not claim they're losing massive amounts of money either. Those stats are probably true,...
  20. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    That was misquoted. They said they don't look at sites like mangareader to make licensing decisions. They didn't say they don't look online.

    The perspective about scans hurting their business is...
  21. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    But they didn't say scanlations are bankrupting them. They said that scanlations are reducing their sales. The presence of a free alternative will turn some paying customers away, but there will be...
  22. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Wagatsuma was from the original batch that CR did with a joint effort from Kodansha Japan, more so than US. Not to mention that CR goes after manga licenses for literally anything they can get their...
  23. Replies
    687
    Views
    84,659

    [Mag Talk] Re: JUMP SQ News and Discussion

    More like they just fucked up the release. Popularity doesn't matter when it comes to those bonuses. They do them anyway 9 times out of 10. Especially since it's just a small one.
  24. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    World Trigger will be absent in #33?
  25. Replies
    223
    Views
    22,805

    [Publisher] Re: US Manga Industry and Publisher News Thread

    Baccano is just Durarara but with time thrown into the mix.
  26. Replies
    223
    Views
    22,805

    [Publisher] Re: US Manga Industry and Publisher News Thread

    Yen Press licensed
    Aphorism by Karuna Kujo https://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=31646 https://twitter.com/debaoki/status/617763054579658752
    Kake Gurui, and others...
  27. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2014-11-19/masashi-kishimoto-to-start-work-on-next-title-after-naruto-after-next-summer/.81192
  28. Replies
    1,850
    Views
    295,657

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shounen Sunday (Shogakukan)

    But this doesn't mean she wants everything to be digital, as we've just discussed.



    Viz has mentioned that there are authors who are like that, although they would not mention who.
  29. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    They use the asterisk to keep alignment, without having to use a spreadsheet. This may be lost due to different formatting in a different site.
  30. Replies
    1,850
    Views
    295,657

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shounen Sunday (Shogakukan)

    Some authors request that their works don't be published digitally. For some, it's all of their works, but it wouldn't be surprising if certain authors didn't want specific titles they have, to be...
  31. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Time and time again, people are treating it as a perfect science, then backtrack on it. Pretending like they know it's not.

    Based on your reply, it looks like you didn't read DoctorApollo's post....
  32. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Rem also did this http://www.yenpress.com/soulless/
  33. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    The * is used because they don't use a spreadsheet or any special program so this evenly spaces out the numbers in their template. It doesn't exactly work here, in this site, but if you look at info...
  34. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Unadulterated tocs from 1968 to 2000, nothing omitted

    http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~starman/index.htm
  35. Replies
    223
    Views
    22,805

    [Publisher] Re: US Manga Industry and Publisher News Thread

    https://www.fakku.net/forums/feedback-suggestions-and-support/the-future-121510
  36. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    He's talking about getting popular in general. He thinks they have the potential.
  37. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    I'm pretty sure that's a joke.

    There isn't even anything else to that and you're automatically assuming he's bashing the manga because you've seen people call it out for copying? Lol.
  38. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Or maybe it's because some people are also elitists.

    Oddly enough, you don't really hear people talk about Tokyo Kushu using that Japanese name.
  39. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    He looks like he's adjusting a camera for a group picture.
  40. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    I love those doodoo brown colors.
  41. Replies
    260
    Views
    47,810

    [Mag Talk] Re: Ultra Jump (Seinen Mag by Shueisha)

    table of contents
  42. Replies
    1,398
    Views
    183,386

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Confirmation that Haikyuu was dead last in issue 42 of 2013

    http://hamada.tsukaeru.info/jump/2013/jump1342.html
    http://weeklyjump.livejournal.com/2013/09/10/

    Hachi (New Series, Cover, Lead...
  43. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    It's really hard to say. I'd say T is around 13, but T+ is around 15/16.

    They let violence and gore slide sometimes though.
  44. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Just going by 100 yen for a dollar, manga is from around 500 to maybe 800 or so, and that's MSRP.

    About Parasyte
    http://kodanshacomics.tumblr.com/tagged/Parasyte
    http://4NN.cx/.80076
  45. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    They added E-Robot and Soma after changing their age rating for their magazine from T to T+.
    Without a rating change first, it wouldn't have been put into ESJ.

    Viz has said they may not do all...
  46. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    If it's just the first 3 chapters, then it's possible.
  47. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    Not yet, too early. They usually do so around a week before the serializations start.
  48. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/daily-briefs/2015-04-03/one-piece-manga-no.77-gets-3.8-million-print-run/.86695[/QUOTE]


    Do you not understand that each successive volume sells less than the...
  49. Replies
    687
    Views
    84,659

    [Mag Talk] Re: JUMP SQ News and Discussion

    I'm not shocked that you still seem to think that everyone has the exact same taste as you.
  50. Replies
    2,002
    Views
    264,304

    [Mag Talk] Re: Weekly Shonen Jump [2015] - Discussion and TOC Talk

    https://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=19659
    https://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=2350
    https://www.mangaupdates.com/series.html?id=75456...
Results 1 to 50 of 204
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4