I have my eyes on you, seriously <___< you made 12 posts, which mostly consistent of posts supposed to look meaningful. Talking about the avatars, the role of the lover, some comment about english on the internet, some sentences about milly's behaviour (protecting him in the end), more talk about Death Note lore, saying people should post more (that was your second comment btw, which makes the whole post hilarious) and mentioning that this seems to be an organized game. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about who you suspect, not even discussing with others. All you mentioned were "4 people you might vote for", but you never named them. Then some half-assed reason to vote for Faust out of the blue.
You're clearly suspicious so please tell me why I shouldn't vote for you?
Welp, it was just a theory for why he's playing the way he is, since he insists he isn't trolling...
loverbomb, would you play out this strategy? Because unless it drastically changes the situation towards the end game, I don't think Mafia would like to exchange kills, so, in the end, your initial bait could have lured in a townie in.
Maybe it's just me, but it seemed a bit off from an ideal strategy for me.
We were too caught up with the other issues at hand, so, apparently, no one bothered to take a look at what he was doing.
Niichan, I'm impressed. But same could have been said about you, until just now.
What do you want me to say? That there's absolutely nothing that convinces me one way or the other? That I'm always suspicious of Imp or Gary?
I'm pretty sure that I suspected Faust and I do suspect Imp, but suspecting Imp's more out of habit than anything, not because I truly believe he's a mafia member.
I also said in that post, although not the part that you quoted, that I wasn't sure how much I'd be around today and whether or not DD would end the game early, so I got a vote in. I was also one of the first seven to vote, way before we could suspect too many other people.
The post in its entirety, so not just how you quoted it to support your case.
Last edited by FrostyMouse; February 01, 2013 at 08:18 PM.
I still suspect him since this could be a well versed plot having read through that. But his argument is much more solid.
---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:18 PM ----------
Either way, I won't be voting for him anymore. After such a strong analysis, there just isn't enough clue to make people get onto a bandwagon to kill him.
So, niichan is either a skilled townie or a skilled mafia. It won't be easy dealing with him for whichever side he opposes.
What I want you to say is quite easy: Discuss matters and suspects with the others, you were online for most of the day and still you didn't participate in a single discussion. All you ever commented about was some meaningless stuff like the lovers role or the state of the game.
That stuff about always being suspicious of guys like Imp or Gary is just a lame mafia excuse. I know it, because I've been mafia often enough and I know it's pretty tiring to come up with a plausible theory for who is mafia when you know that actually you're the mafia guy.
And I believe this is not your first time playing this game? Have you ever seen DD end a day early if not everyone made their vote? As far as I recall he always waited until everyone made a decision or until the time ran out. Saying you feared the game would end early is just another silly excuse to make a random vote.
---------- Post added at 02:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:27 AM ----------
Okay, I know I won't change my opinion. Frosty's answer made him even more suspicious so votekill Frostymouse
You've debated that much? Don't try to switch your inactivity onto me. How is being gone the entire day, getting online about two and a half hours ago, reading the thread, and making a post or two count as me being online the entire day?
You can believe that it's just a falsehood, but in truth of fact, Gary starts out as my No. 1 suspect each and every Mafia Game.
I've never played with DD as a host, only with Evil. Evil has cut phases short on us before.
NN, you misrepresented my post in an attempt to make me look guilty? How does that not make you look suspicious? If I suspected you, wouldn't I have perhaps voted for you?
So, it looks like this is the end of the argument. Regardless of the roles, by an objective evaluation, niichan won it.
This makes the things a bit easier. At best case, a mafia is lynched. At worst, a townie with lesser observation skills demonstrated is lost and a strong mafia lives on. We won't be getting niichan even if he's a mafia in this turn, anyway. Faust and Xadyu are discussed mostly, but Faust's earlier excitement was justified by the theme of the game to a degree, while Xadyu's case is less proven than Frosty to go after him. In the end, I don't think Faust is a Mafia and we will probably be getting the head of a townie if we let niichan's proposed clue go. So, in the end, I'd say, following niichan's lead for now gives us the best result according to the game theory, since we have little chance to take down a mafia with other suspicions being mostly vague or just biased.
That's not a confirmation of niichan's side, though. But he played an impressive gambit and things aren't looking any better if we refuse.
Vote Kill FrostyMouse
It doesn't matter that much if you've been online the whole day, 2 and a half hours should have given you enough time to discuss some stuff besides the lame "the avavats here and the roles there". You either were too lazy to participate in a discussion or you weren't trying anyway/you couldn't come up with someting good because you're mafia. I strongly believe it's the second case because someone who's too lazy to participate usually doesn't post anyway but in your case it was:
Discussion -> Frosty stays silent
Some comment about roles etc. -> all of a sudden Frosty makes a comment
and that's a noticeable pattern if you look at the posts you made so far.
And Evil ending a Day one 10 hours earlier? Lol, has something like that ever happened? This is so unlikely and even if, I doubt he or in this case DD would have banned you. I may repeat myself but this sounds like a stupid reason to make a random vote and then disappear for some time. Heck, no one knows if this might even be a part of your strategy as no one can prove you haven't been online. The fact that you didn't participate in any discussion or at least tried to come up with your own theory supports my believe.
I don't really get the last part, saying I misinterpreted your post is a baseless statement and doesn't confirm anything. Obviously you vote for someone you suspect and you're my main suspect so I voted for you.