- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
From what we´ve seen, it seems that Gantz makes copies of the people whe they are healthy and then uses these copies to bring them back to life. This explains how Katou couldn´t remember having died in the Buddah mission, because Gantz made a copy of him before he started fighting the final Buddah.
However, there´s a big flaw in this theory: if you remember, one of the first Gantzers was a politician who died because of cancer. When he appeared in the room, he said that the cancer had gone and he couldn´t feel it anymore. A disease like this takes some time to develop, so if Gantz had made a copy of him when he was healthy he would be much younger than he was when he died...so actually, in this case, Gantz did cure the disease and restored the damaged organs.
So judging from this, it´s resonable to think that Gantz can cure any disease and that it can make much more than copy people when they´re healthy, don´t you think?
However Nishi clearly stated that Gantz only made copies of people like when sending a fax and whe have never seen Gantz ever again cure someone...so I think this must be a mistake made by the author.
What do you guys think?
However, there´s a big flaw in this theory: if you remember, one of the first Gantzers was a politician who died because of cancer. When he appeared in the room, he said that the cancer had gone and he couldn´t feel it anymore. A disease like this takes some time to develop, so if Gantz had made a copy of him when he was healthy he would be much younger than he was when he died...so actually, in this case, Gantz did cure the disease and restored the damaged organs.
So judging from this, it´s resonable to think that Gantz can cure any disease and that it can make much more than copy people when they´re healthy, don´t you think?
However Nishi clearly stated that Gantz only made copies of people like when sending a fax and whe have never seen Gantz ever again cure someone...so I think this must be a mistake made by the author.
What do you guys think?
