- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 301
- Reaction score
- 28
- Gender
- Male
- Country
Is it just me or was I not the only one dissatisfied with this match?
first time i read about it it was cool. now that i think it over.
I realized fuji had to win or be eliminated.
1) were you satsified with the results?
2)if it was tezuka vs fuji at the time with no zero shiki serve, would fuji have won?
my opinion.
1) I was not satisfied. I thikn Niou could have put in more fight as a tezuka clone. Fuji stated that Niou couldn't copy tezuka's zero shiki serve , and that niou is no where near the same as the real tezuka.
given that, i think niou could have countered a blind fuji. he had tezuka zone, phantom, pinnacle hard work. yes i'm aware fuji countered some of those , but in the blind state, fuji wouldn't have won vs those skills. its called mixing your techniques up to confuse the opponent. they are initailly sealed, but if you can rotate them through the match. its purely subjective : (
2) tezuka would win.
first time i read about it it was cool. now that i think it over.
I realized fuji had to win or be eliminated.
1) were you satsified with the results?
2)if it was tezuka vs fuji at the time with no zero shiki serve, would fuji have won?
my opinion.
1) I was not satisfied. I thikn Niou could have put in more fight as a tezuka clone. Fuji stated that Niou couldn't copy tezuka's zero shiki serve , and that niou is no where near the same as the real tezuka.
given that, i think niou could have countered a blind fuji. he had tezuka zone, phantom, pinnacle hard work. yes i'm aware fuji countered some of those , but in the blind state, fuji wouldn't have won vs those skills. its called mixing your techniques up to confuse the opponent. they are initailly sealed, but if you can rotate them through the match. its purely subjective : (
2) tezuka would win.
Last edited by a moderator: