Games Mafia Game 51 - League of Legends: Clown Fiesta - END GAME

[GrySun]

No there wasn't '-' And I would be disappointed if I was in the shoes of the person that is gonna die instead of Holt xD (if that happens)

Tie is a tie, now shush

 

[Utsune]

Votekill xnut

 

[Kat]

19/22

Holt 4x (Evil3ye, Philia, James Rye, Farfalla)

xnut 4x (gnut, Zasz, GrySun, Ustune)

James Rye 2x (g01, xi0)

Philia 2x (Holt, WithYouInSpirit)

Mazino 2x (Demonspeed, Hakuteiken)

xi0 1x (lawlett-kun)

g01 1x (Ustegius)

Erinyes 1x (Mazino)

Ēsu Taichou 1x (Erinyes)

gnut 1x (xnut)

AFK-ERS // Players who haven't voted
Ēsu Taichou, SheepyTurtle, SugarKitty

 

[Utsune]

I'm not sure if I want that many people dying right off the bat

 

[Hakuteiken]

No there wasn't '-' And I would be disappointed if I was in the shoes of the person that is gonna die instead of Holt xD (if that happens)

There was a tie, but not within the locked vote numbers.
Maybe that rule got stealth-nerfed into only taking place in the extended phases instead of regular ones. I'm not sure.

 

[Utsune]

wtf 4 on Holt now, whatever

 

[Farfalla]

Don't shush me in this case D: I don't even know who was the other one (James I guess). But he had 2 locked votes against 3 from Holt. That's not a tie according to the rules xD Sigh, lemme double check.

 

[James Rye]

Honestly, you just went off on your own without playing for the team.
If anything, your detective call has just lost a ton of credibility with that one move.

I don't mind getting lynched next day by all 19 votes, heck I even will vote on myself if that's allowed. But if I need to act suspicious to make sure ALL dets will check out a single person at once to have a good basic where to start guessing which sanity they got, then by all means that will help us townies greatly. I don't got a really important role anyway. Can't kill, can't investivate, can't do anything and yet it totally befits the combination of the superhero theme and Teemo combination.

 

[Riku]

It seems both of them aren't here right now, which leaves the burden of choice on us.

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 28, 2016, Original Post Date: Aug 28, 2016 ---

We had a tie apparently.

Didn't Holt have more locked votes? If he did, he should have gotten lynched.

And yet it still got used as argument against me when in my fourth game I had been in the mafia like 3 times already. Just look at today's politics, stupid arguments win everywhere it seems. xD

Because someone weard socks with sandals, it doesn't mean you should too. :I

 

[Spirit]

Those School Bells are beckoning.
I'm signing off

 

[Farfalla]

"If by the end of the the regular time of the day phase two or more players have the same amount of votes, the second votes ("locked votes") are decisive. The player with the most locked votes is being lynched."

There. Was. Not. A. Tie.

 

[xi0]

Don't shush me in this case D: I don't even know who was the other one (James I guess). But he had 2 locked votes against 3 from Holt. That's not a tie according to the rules xD Sigh, lemme double check.

The application of tiebreaking when it comes to lynching has always been a big point of contention among many hosts honestly...

I think the votelock rule was usually applied when the phase got extended longer than once or something, but my memory is shit.

 

[Demonspeed]

There was a tie, but not within the locked vote numbers.
Maybe that rule got stealth-nerfed into only taking place in the extended phases instead of regular ones. I'm not sure.

It depends on the host. The locked votes priority rule has not always applied.

 

[GrySun]

Don't shush me in this case D: I don't even know who was the other one (James I guess). But he had 2 locked votes against 3 from Holt. That's not a tie according to the rules xD Sigh, lemme double check.

The other one was xnut actually. Now shhh

Focus your energy on deciding who to vote for to resolve the tie. Everything else will be known later.

 

[Erinyes]

I don't mind getting lynched next day by all 19 votes, heck I even will vote on myself if that's allowed. But if I need to act suspicious to make sure ALL dets will check out a single person at once to have a good basic where to start guessing which sanity they got, then by all means that will help us townies greatly. I don't got a really important role anyway. Can't kill, can't investivate, can't do anything and yet it totally befits the combination of the superhero theme and Teemo combination.

Innocent child ?

 

[James Rye]

Well, then panda is screwing with us. xD

 

[xi0]

"If by the end of the the regular time of the day phase two or more players have the same amount of votes, the second votes ("locked votes") are decisive. The player with the most locked votes is being lynched."

There. Was. Not. A. Tie.

I'm not sure the last tally before the thread lock was fully updated...

And the rule thread is in need of an update in several places

 

[Utsune]

I don't trust James if that's the way you put it, you see if I call you out on that I'm gonna be the one getting lynched and that's all on the crowd. Wake up people!!1

 

[Holt]

Uh, wtf is happening? I think I missed the memo but why is there suddenly a wagon on me?

 

[Farfalla]

The application of tiebreaking when it comes to lynching has always been a big point of contention among many hosts honestly...

I think the votelock rule was usually applied when the phase got extended longer than once or something, but my memory is shit.

My point is, according to the rules, it's not a tie to break when there's a difference in the locked votes^^'
If there was, then yes, there's nothing written on stone and every host deals with it differently.