Games Mafia Game 56 - Dragon Ball Z: A New Threat - END GAME

[Copy Panda]

How does it de randomize?

...

current/typical d1 situation: banter, memes, surprise and mild disappointment at townie dying
proposed situation: participate the game by using the transfer mechanic, discuss who to kill, collectively try to move forward our game state by doing something rather than just waiting because in the short run we lose less people.

I.e. it's our behaviour that will derandomize, and our ideas over who to kill, not necessarily the sheer chance of us actually killing someone.

considering that you want to kill everyone

Nice strawman

So Panda, considering that you want to kill everyone, for the sake of good of course, who is at the top of your list?

I'd say Holt then you

Jammin and Syx (and Org for that matter) are suspect too, but it's backed by as much

--- Double Post Merged, Sep 7, 2017, Original Post Date: Sep 7, 2017 ---

Upon pressing him for info Panda went quiet... Townies shouldn't really need to think so carefully about their answer.

I went to make tea, WithYouInSherlock

 

[Spirit]

...

current/typical d1 situation: banter, memes, surprise and mild disappointment at townie dying
proposed situation: participate the game by using the transfer mechanic, discuss who to kill, collectively try to move forward our game state by doing something rather than just waiting because in the short run we lose less people.

I.e. it's our behaviour that will derandomize, and our ideas over who to kill, not necessarily the sheer chance of us actually killing someone.



Nice strawman



I'd say Holt then you

Jammin and Syx (and Org for that matter) are suspect too, but it's backed by as much

Votekill Holt then. Or Me. Or syx. Does it matter? There is pretty much the same insubstantial amount of evidence between all of us, your suspects.

 

[Copy Panda]

I'd do so if I didn't have the non-voter disease genius

 

[Holt]

...

current/typical d1 situation: banter, memes, surprise and mild disappointment at townie dying
proposed situation: participate the game by using the transfer mechanic, discuss who to kill, collectively try to move forward our game state by doing something rather than just waiting because in the short run we lose less people.

I.e. it's our behaviour that will derandomize, and our ideas over who to kill, not necessarily the sheer chance of us actually killing someone.



Nice strawman



I'd say Holt then you

Jammin and Syx (and Org for that matter) are suspect too, but it's backed by as much

--- Double Post Merged, Sep 7, 2017, Original Post Date: Sep 7, 2017 ---

I went to make tea, WithYouInSherlock

No, your purpose was to simply cull numbers. You had no interest in what it might bring up in the process. Actually, you gave no thought to it AFAIK.

OK, so what are your reasons for wanting me dead? You realize this contradicts your idea of killing inactives?

 

[Spirit]

It must be hard watching your Mafia pals get to vote without you. Don't worry there's always tomorrow.

 

[Copy Panda]

Votekill Holt then. Or Me. Or syx.

But not Jammin? heh

Does it matter?

It does not! Let's just not lynch anyone \o/

There is pretty much the same insubstantial amount of evidence between all of us, your suspects.

Well, no 'evidence', true, but some pretty interesting statements :^)

 

[Holt]

No, your purpose was to simply cull numbers. You had no interest in what it might bring up in the process. Actually, you gave no thought to it AFAIK.

OK, so what are your reasons for wanting me dead? You realize this contradicts your idea of killing inactives?

Actually, all those are people you claim to suspect, which again, goes against your initial proposal

 

[Kato756]

I am scared of backing TSPanda on his plan of killing people because if hes mafia then I am dead the next day by association >.<

But I still argue that with 30 players, losing 2 on day one wouldn´t be so bad. The more time we wait to use the Genki-Dama the less likely it is to work (since we could have up to 10 enemies)...
I´d say we lynch someone we think is mafia, and bomb a inactive

 

[Battou]

Votekill! WYIS

 

[Holt]

I am scared of backing TSPanda on his plan of killing people because if hes mafia then I am dead the next day by association >.<

But I still argue that with 30 players, losing 2 on day one wouldn´t be so bad. The more time we wait to use the Genki-Dama the less likely it is to work (since we could have up to 10 enemies)...
I´d say we lynch someone we think is mafia, and bomb a inactive

This is odd. Killing a townie won't automatically make those who did Mafia. Sure there's likely to be a Mafia in there, but it won't be certain who is. It won't mean either you or panda are Mafia and thus, dead...

On the second, who do you think is Mafia? It's these thoughts I've been trying to get everyone to do

 

[Spirit]

But not Jammin? heh



It does not! Let's just not lynch anyone \o/



Well, no 'evidence', true, but some pretty interesting statements :^)

Yeah Jammin seems cool so far.

 

[Copy Panda]

No, your purpose was to simply cull numbers. You had no interest in what it might bring up in the process. Actually, you gave no thought to it AFAIK.

OK, so what are your reasons for wanting me dead? You realize this contradicts your idea of killing inactives?

Actually if you go back, you'll find that I proposed this solution in response to YOUR post about us not letting Day 1 be random lmfao

And the reason I want you dead is that you bring up weird arguments, seemingly for the sheer purpose of wanting to argue, against a strategy that's actually not much worse than just doing nothing, which is what you want. Or not, since you also said we shouldn't just do nothing on D1 but actively participate and discuss and share thoughts on the only day we have nothing to work with.

I'm suspect of you because you contradict yourself while disagreeing with a solution to the problem you yourself brought up xd

 

[SonOfDaws]

So, there's over 200 posts here that I've yet to read. Will I read them later? Probably not, but I do have a few things to say:

Firstly... did the "Genki Dama" ever actually kill somebody? Vegata got hit with one and just slept it off, Frieza got hit and ended up just kinda annoyed, Kid Buu kinda sorta got killed, but then he kinda sorta came back as Uub. Plus, Majin Buu's still alive sooo..?

On that note
transfer to xi0
Now, some of you may believe this decision is primarily based on the thumbnail, but I'll have you know it was based entirely on the thumbnail. If you got a problem with it, get a better thumbnail.

Also
votekill Vandred
Insta votelocking is stupid, suspect, or both. Either way, I'd say it's vote-worthy.

 

[Holt]

Votekill! WYIS

Any particular reason?

 

[Spirit]

Not sure if Panda is playing dumb or not

Battou about 7t to play the "I'm new so I'm also unaccountable" card.

 

[Copy Panda]

So, there's over 200 posts here that I've yet to read. Will I read them later? Probably not, but I do have a few things to say:

Firstly... did the "Genki Dama" ever actually kill somebody? Vegata got hit with one and just slept it off, Frieza got hit and ended up just kinda annoyed, Kid Buu kinda sorta got killed, but then he kinda sorta came back as Uub. Plus, Majin Buu's still alive sooo..?

For what it's worth, your account won't be deleted, you just don't play the game anymore. So I'd say this Genki Dama is actually very true to the show!

Actually, all those are people you claim to suspect, which again, goes against your initial proposal

Yes, because they, unlike the inactives, said suspicious stuff. I made the proposal of killing inactives because we didn't have any leads to go on, but since you're providing us with leads, the target list changes up a bit

I am scared of backing TSPanda on his plan of killing people because if hes mafia then I am dead the next day by association >.<

But I still argue that with 30 players, losing 2 on day one wouldn´t be so bad. The more time we wait to use the Genki-Dama the less likely it is to work (since we could have up to 10 enemies)...
I´d say we lynch someone we think is mafia, and bomb a inactive

Just Panda is fine

Yeah Jammin seems cool so far.

?? But you don't??

 

[Spirit]

For what it's worth, your account won't be deleted, you just don't play the game anymore. So I'd say this Genki Dama is actually very true to the show!



Yes, because they, unlike the inactives, said suspicious stuff. I made the proposal of killing inactives because we didn't have any leads to go on, but since you're providing us with leads, the target list changes up a bit



Just Panda is fine



?? But you don't??

Sorry.

 

[GrySun]

I think Panda is town, he plays similar to the pokemon game. His thoughts and playstyle don't seem artificial.
As for Holt, I always have trouble making out what he is, but for now I think you two are just 2 townies with a different mindset and approach to the game, so don't waste too much time on arguing.

 

[Copy Panda]

Not sure if Panda is playing dumb or not

Battou about 7t to play the "I'm new so I'm also unaccountable" card.

Playing dumb about what?

Also, I'm going to have dinner, don't get too upset if I don't respond in 5 milliseconds this time o/

 

[Totinona]

Have slight suspicions about Erinyes and Tina because they're giving off newbie-vibe (and I don't know if that's intentional or not)..

I thought Erinyes wasn't a newbie? It's not intentional from my part, but I am also trying to be honest about my insecurities about being fresh to the game (at least in it's current state). Also trying to be wary of anyone playing me like a fiddle because of it.