I'm not asking you to motivate the choice, I'm asking you to put on the record who you targeted. Now that you already used your stand, and that player survived, there's merit in trying to figure out how that situation came to be. To prevent you from consolidating a claim later. There's no reason whatsoever to hold back, especially now that our lead on gnut might be fizzling out
Will the insane doctor please stand up? If not we know more for sure.
No the thing is, if he was killed I'd be told that as well (killing is a targeting jutsu). Daws hasn't been targeted by anyone
Yes of course. Read the Stand rules and interaction threads, all situations should be covered.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Why did you want to kill Vandred? XDWell okay Panda, my target was Vandred. I think if it really was a stand doctor, he can come out and prove my claim. My guess is it might have been Spirit, but he's probably the sole dude who shouldn't outright admit it bc he claimed he has the same role and stand lol.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Not sure why you're on my case so strongly shinobi, all I've been doing is suspecting gnut since Day 2 and sticked with that, because he really gave me no reason to trust him since then
Because I found his behavior suspicious obviously. Accusing me of a bad action isn't helping anyone, ofc it was a bit of a gamble but I was willing to take that risk. If he had died, we might have a big lead who joined his votes and arguments and who didn't, that would have been helpful in any case. Him not dying sadly made the whole thing useless, but tough luck I guess =/
I agree with everyone revealing a bit more considering there are some who haven't even said if their role /stand is active or passive. I prefer not to reveal completely yet but when I said my stand is passive and ironic I meant that while my role benefits everyone else except me, my stand benefits only me.
Admittedly gnut is afk so far. I don't defend gnut btw, just to be clear on this.Because I found his behavior suspicious obviously. Accusing me of a bad action isn't helping anyone, ofc it was a bit of a gamble but I was willing to take that risk. If he had died, we might have a big lead who joined his votes and arguments and who didn't, that would have been helpful in any case. Him not dying sadly made the whole thing useless, but tough luck I guess =/
And I didn't wait for gnut bc it took him what, 8 hours into the dayphase without saying anything? He made like 2 or 3 posts in the last 24 hours, and ignored all questions coming at him, and not just from me. If that isn't suspicious I dunno, but it seems he's successful bc the focus is slowly shifting elsewhere
No, because killing Lambu during early Day 1 didn't help anyone. Learning Vandreds role by day 3 would have given us a lead no matter what though, because it would make certain people either look more or less suspicious, like who voted for the same guy/girl as Van during Day 1 and Day 2. I admit that it ofc was a risk, but it's not as bad as you make it sound.
I still think we should go for Greg, but sure, maybe Van can add something to this discussion, now that he knows I targeted him.
It's 12AM here already, so I'll have to leave soon sadly =/ But I still think it's a good idea to share thoughts about other people here (at least the few who are somewhat active...). Personally I find Cres posts slightly confusing, but they do sound earnest
Can't really say anything about Desin besides the weird code thing, but not sure if that amounts to much.