- Joined
- May 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,056
- Reaction score
- 915
- Age
- 37
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
Double Arts cancellation still hurts... Part of me wishes Naoshi Komi makes either a continuation or a reimagining of the story, because the premise was very interesting, and now that he is super famous he would have the audience (I mean, it's not like Double Arts didn't have an audience back then..)
If you look at the lineup posted by Tirakai:
https://mangahelpers.com/forum/thre...-discussion-and-toc-talk.3017861/post-5528680
Out of those 19 titles think only Bari Haken, Double Arts and Kurogane didn't reach at least 10 volumes.
Also Hunter x Hunter was absent (...) and Gintama was probably on break that weak or something, so out of 20 manga there were only 3 that didn't get at least 10 volumes.
I can only imagine Double Art's cancellation must have been a very difficult editorial meeting because it was performing well (Heck, I remember we were all surprised when the announcement was made... Sure it had dropped in TOC, but it was doing just fine 4 weeks before that...)
But, with the power of hindsight... What else could the editors have canceled back then? Just look at that line-up.
I mean, realistically speaking they should have just canceled Kurogane, it sold worse than Double Arts ever did, and Bari Haken probably got some special treatment because of it being made by a veteran.
Now... From the current lineup, I think they have a bit more spare room, and could have spared Phantom Seer. Shueisha knew for example of Akutami's problem, and they could just "easily" given Akutami a week-off every month or something (like Oda) and with Oda and now Akutami's week-off that could have basically "created" a new spot in the magazine... Kind of... You get my point. Basically, I think if Jump gave at least their senior mangaka a week-off every month or two months they could create an extra spot, that way they can certainly give themselves more of a breathing room to cancel.
If you look at the lineup posted by Tirakai:
https://mangahelpers.com/forum/thre...-discussion-and-toc-talk.3017861/post-5528680
Out of those 19 titles think only Bari Haken, Double Arts and Kurogane didn't reach at least 10 volumes.
Also Hunter x Hunter was absent (...) and Gintama was probably on break that weak or something, so out of 20 manga there were only 3 that didn't get at least 10 volumes.
I can only imagine Double Art's cancellation must have been a very difficult editorial meeting because it was performing well (Heck, I remember we were all surprised when the announcement was made... Sure it had dropped in TOC, but it was doing just fine 4 weeks before that...)
But, with the power of hindsight... What else could the editors have canceled back then? Just look at that line-up.
I mean, realistically speaking they should have just canceled Kurogane, it sold worse than Double Arts ever did, and Bari Haken probably got some special treatment because of it being made by a veteran.
Now... From the current lineup, I think they have a bit more spare room, and could have spared Phantom Seer. Shueisha knew for example of Akutami's problem, and they could just "easily" given Akutami a week-off every month or something (like Oda) and with Oda and now Akutami's week-off that could have basically "created" a new spot in the magazine... Kind of... You get my point. Basically, I think if Jump gave at least their senior mangaka a week-off every month or two months they could create an extra spot, that way they can certainly give themselves more of a breathing room to cancel.