well I need to go to sleep so I ll vote on a non hinter for now, while both gb and scav didn’t hint, scav at least somewhat explained why he wont hint (even tho I’m not totally convinced by it but it’s better than nothing) while I don't know what gb is doing
so VOTEKILL GB
I did it on a whim, but honestly I'm considering leaving my vote there, perhaps locking it. Only 4 posts but even then he's said remarkably little in them and ignored opportunity to engage in dialogue further. He seemed very intent to just lurk and avoid doing more than the bare minimum.
My plan is to place a tentative vote on the leading wagon, then take a read through the entire thread (7 pages seems manageable) before posting my thoughts.
Because we only have 3 hours left in this day phase and I'm at work, I may not be able to complete going through the thread before the day phase ends. So I might post shorter periodic updates.
Uber - Active (Hint D1: Post #9)
Asako - Active (Hint D1: Post#10)
Shad - Active, never had before (Hint D1: Post#12)
Maryxxi - Active (Hint D1: Post#16)
Cinera - Active (Hint D1: Post#20) + " I do hate people who break oaths." (Post#66)
Pompon - Active (Hint D1: Post#23)
Margi - Passive (Hint D1: Post#24)
Seraph - Passive (Hint D1: Post#46)
Misha - Active (Post#48)
James - Has a role that " that easily proves itself " (Post#56)
Kira - Active, never had it before (Post#69)
Tatsumaki - Active (Post#74)
Sam - Passive (Post#79)
Brandish - Had the role before (Post#114)
Scav - Doesn't want to hint on D1
GB - Troll hint...
As I said, I will vote the one I think is least cooperative: Those would be Scav and @GB
Scav says that early hinting allows Mafia to pick better targets, when it actually hinders scum because it gives them less options to blend in with town later on. Moreover, since the majority of players have hinted already you would actually stand out to scum, so it makes even less sense for a townie to refrain from hinting now. So Scav's argument sounds pretty scum to me.
But then we have GB who has been mostly trolling around. To me that's even worse than Scav's groundless reasons, I don't care if this is his usual self, at least give us smthg to go with...(plus, the guy has an Omo advisor to have the chance to change things up, which he doesn't)
Votekill GB
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I'm also looking out for people with evasive/sly posts that pretend to be contributing but actually say nothing of value, for instance: @Tatsumaki , aside from hinting, looks like she just wants to get by the day unnoticed. But imma give her the benefit of the doubt for now until I see what she does and says.
I have less time than I would have liked for the remainder of the first day.
Some people change of playstyle is worth noting. Votekill scav I have never played with you, this is probably how you play but you're still as good of a placeholder as any.
also looking out for people with evasive/sly posts that pretend to be contributing but actually say nothing of value, for instance: @Tatsumaki , aside from hinting, looks like she just wants to get by the day unnoticed. But imma give her the benefit of the doubt for now until I see what she does and says.
Oh no I'm perfectly aware that what I said wasn't much contribution.
I'm usually the quiet type on the first days, I'm not actively trying to lay low or anything.
The eventual little things I could have discussed I won't have time to now.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Hopefully I can come back before the day end and see if the people topping the vote said anything to help their case or not.
My plan is to place a tentative vote on the leading wagon, then take a read through the entire thread (7 pages seems manageable) before posting my thoughts.
Because we only have 3 hours left in this day phase and I'm at work, I may not be able to complete going through the thread before the day phase ends. So I might post shorter periodic updates.
that placeholder smells rotten, little reason to do a placeholder with 1 hour left.
Even with that, i see little reason to vote shad on day 1 as a placeholder, could understand someone inactive or "uncooperative" player but not shad considering he making talk, and honestly how i see it, we seriously need player that do push as half of us are no pushers
Anyways what i mean is, feel like that placeholder is just avoiding responsibility especially as it's on shad, could at least put it on someone that deserves a placeholder
I did it on a whim, but honestly I'm considering leaving my vote there, perhaps locking it. Only 4 posts but even then he's said remarkably little in them and ignored opportunity to engage in dialogue further. He seemed very intent to just lurk and avoid doing more than the bare minimum.