Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - Day 3

[SirSamuel016]

i havent contributed much due to timing, at most i can offer im a plain townie

Why was "simple" the descriptive word that you used when talking about it prior?

 

[Natasha]

Thinking its got to be Panda or Pom for this lynch based on their play and vibes, leaning Pan. Not sure I'm agreeing with Nash so I'm open to that too as long as we're not lynching Lawl today

Is most of your trust in Lawl from the fact he was pushed early = opportunisitc?

Cause I agree the heat he caught from his hint was unwarranted, his response stinks though.

 

[Hardy]

Pom is doing moves that seem scummy (like quickly backing off when she's usually more... tenacious) but at the same time if she were scum I don't see her doing them because she'd know that's different behaviour. Wine In Front Of Me.

 

[Copy Panda]

pomcha what was your reasoning to lock? i can imagine why lawl did

waa there any other interesting info unearthed? did tatsu say anything concerning her activity? that remains immensely sus to me, town tatsu never shows up with material info early

 

[SirSamuel016]

Is most of your trust in Lawl from the fact he was pushed early = opportunisitc?

Cause I agree the heat he caught from his hint was unwarranted, his response stinks though.

Only in part. Yes the push felt opportunistic but I don't think his responses have 'stunk.' I'll have a re-read in case I'm having another moment but nothing has alarmed me there. If anything you're alarming me a bit more in this back and forth with Hardy because I think he's been more sound with his arguments

 

[Copy Panda]

Why was "simple" the descriptive word that you used when talking about it prior?

so i didnt have to outright claim being plain, could have thrown mafia off. but in my current position ill likely die anyway so i adjusted to the more accurate phrasing

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 12:12 PM, Original Post Date: Wednesday at 12:11 PM ---

whats the case for not killing lawl? i think he'll keep voting for me over anyone else given the opportunity so all things equal i dont mind leaving my vote on him

 

[SirSamuel016]

so i didnt have to outright claim being plain, could have thrown mafia off. but in my current position ill likely die anyway so i adjusted to the more accurate phrasing

Fairs, similar to me early on then before I said fuck it and said the obvious.

Top 3 suspects atm?

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 12:13 PM, Original Post Date: Wednesday at 12:12 PM ---

whats the case for not killing lawl? i think he'll keep voting for me over anyone else given the opportunity so all things equal i dont mind leaving my vote on him

The push for him earlier was opportunistic and I don't think he's done anything thats actually looked off. Just reaching and swinging at an active claim seems to be my view on it

 

[Natasha]

Only in part. Yes the push felt opportunistic but I don't think his responses have 'stunk.' I'll have a re-read in case I'm having another moment but nothing has alarmed me there. If anything you're alarming me a bit more in this back and forth with Hardy because I think he's been more sound with his arguments

I'll read Hardy back too then. I might've gotten to caught in building a pattern plus he was rude >

 

[Copy Panda]

tatsu, for early activity and contributions
pomcha, for locking kako (altho just that, i didnt read the actual post she explains her locking)

im not sure i have a third but lawl claims a tricky role which i doubt is present in this kind of game. that has to be a lie, although in his case i dont quite know if its alignment indicative

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 12:15 PM, Original Post Date: Wednesday at 12:14 PM ---

whats marms reasoning for voting me

 

[SirSamuel016]

I'll read Hardy back too then. I might've gotten to caught in building a pattern plus he was rude >

I don't mind him tbh, defs wasn't rude but rather shirtfronted you on just gagging around

You were one of a few players that needed a bit of a push to lock in; similarly I think Copan until recently had contributed fuck all too

 

[Natasha]

whats marms reasoning for voting me

ny vote is based on what I said bedore, i feel he’s noncommital, while I know he’s a tired bear, he’s somehow found the time to post but not really
Votekill Panda

commitment issues lol

 

[Copy Panda]

Its super busy here, my coworker decided today is the day to be extra slow somehow

I’m going to go ahead and vote for now. To me the best option, I willl say that Pom letting go of Lawl somehow feels a bit unlike her (imo she usually holds onto her opinion even if no one shares it and doesnt sway).

ny vote is based on what I said bedore, i feel he’s noncommital, while I know he’s a tired bear, he’s somehow found the time to post but not really
Votekill Panda

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 10:10 AM, Original Post Date: Wednesday at 10:09 AM ---

Okay excuse my english. To me my vote is atm the best option for me, Im open for other suggestions with arguments ofc. Thats what I meant. Not that Pom is the best option just observed something about her.

feels like finding a reason to post. i could have understood something about the contribution itself but shes saying "he seems non commital (...) still found time to post", thats a contradiction

 

[Hardy]

Put a ring on it or die panda

 

[SirSamuel016]

tatsu, for early activity and contributions
pomcha, for locking kako (altho just that, i didnt read the actual post she explains her locking)

im not sure i have a third but lawl claims a tricky role which i doubt is present in this kind of game. that has to be a lie, although in his case i dont quite know if its alignment indicative

Tricky is a bit of a broad descriptor though because it might be about the context its in and not just the role itself; I really don't think its a red flag and its just chasing nothing at this stage.

Agree on Tatsu and Pom.

 

[Natasha]

I don't mind him tbh, defs wasn't rude but rather shirtfronted you on just gagging around

You were one of a few players that needed a bit of a push to lock in; similarly I think Copan until recently had contributed fuck all too

Well it worked. I agree on Copan, voting him this early for content he probably wouldn't post as mafia is not bonefide

 

[SirSamuel016]

whats marms reasoning for voting me

You're a bum and failed the vibe check

 

[Copy Panda]

Tricky is a bit of a broad descriptor though because it might be about the context its in and not just the role itself; I really don't think its a red flag and its just chasing nothing at this stage.

Agree on Tatsu and Pom.

i cant recall a time be claimed a tricky role and actually had one. mostly it's the word he uses to add flavour to something that can be reinterpreted later

but anyway, if it were up to me, id go for one of those 3

 

[SirSamuel016]

I agree on Copan, voting him this early for content he probably wouldn't post as mafia is not bonefide

I'd still lynch him tbh although some of my issues with him might arise from lack of activity from his situation. That said it feels like he was a bit too lax until he realised it was choppy choppy time

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 12:22 PM, Original Post Date: Wednesday at 12:20 PM ---

i cant recall a time be claimed a tricky role and actually had one. mostly it's the word he uses to add flavour to something that can be reinterpreted later

but anyway, if it were up to me, id go for one of those 3

You can't recall what you ate 3 days ago so I don't think that says a lot. Yes it does allow a bit of scope I suppose but I don't think that it in itself is a red flag; certainly not for people to badger him like they did

 

[Copy Panda]

whats the contributions been of nash, vali and dego? have they added anything material to their claims or insights

 

[Tatsumaki]

I'm not up to date what's going on pls I need the fastest recap one can muster