- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 1,885
- Gender
- Male
- Country
I did a listing of KHR's TOC from 2010 till now. It would be insane to track down all of its previous years' TOC so i thought i would just start from 2010. So for those who are interested :
Previously i did a half-f**ked on-the-surface analysis on why KHR had problems with fights , fights that began after the TOC problem that began from late Future saga. I'm not saying that its always the fight fault though, considering that 1 whole chapter cannot be dedicated to just action; there is always plot, character development etc. But i gave up half way , it was quite a bit of work .
Chapter = chapter that the rank is based on
Chapter (TOC)= chapter which appeared in its respective WSJ's issue
For the graph, red dots indicates that that current chapter is in the bottom 5. I left out all the chapters that have CP and Cover since their ranks don't count. Horizontal Axis = Chapters the ranks are based on. Vertical axis = Ranking.
Technically the graph has a problem. I did not count the total amount of mangas that are present in each TOC ; for example, chapter A may have a rank of 13 and be in the bottom 5, but chapter B which also has a rank of 13 may not be in the bottom 5 . For this case i guess calculating the average should have been a more accurate indication of the ranking. But oh well, its alot of work so maybe i will leave it for next time.
Chapter (TOC)= chapter which appeared in its respective WSJ's issue
For the graph, red dots indicates that that current chapter is in the bottom 5. I left out all the chapters that have CP and Cover since their ranks don't count. Horizontal Axis = Chapters the ranks are based on. Vertical axis = Ranking.
Technically the graph has a problem. I did not count the total amount of mangas that are present in each TOC ; for example, chapter A may have a rank of 13 and be in the bottom 5, but chapter B which also has a rank of 13 may not be in the bottom 5 . For this case i guess calculating the average should have been a more accurate indication of the ranking. But oh well, its alot of work so maybe i will leave it for next time.
Last edited: