Re: Mafia Game 34 : Mangahelpers Theme - Day 1
Yeah...you don't get to tell me what to do with my vote...Vote nana.
Yeah...you don't get to tell me what to do with my vote...Vote nana.
Is your role important to the town?Trying to suck up to me now won't help you!
or maybe it does... :3
Like I said, I will be able to do much more tomorrow, you can expect a good performance next dayphase.
Then give me a good reason why I should. Voting for someone else at this point would be even more random than voting for you.Me being on the chopping block doesn't have much to do with niichan's vote...so just fucking change it
If you're not even bothering to read the thread and be abreast of the nonsense that went on here, then I have no reason to explain myself to you. Do what you want. I really don't want to say anything about my role.Then give me a good reason why I should. Voting for someone else at this point would be even more random than voting for you.
Stop telling me what to do with my penis!Yeah...you don't get to tell me what to do with my vote...
wat time bomb knows when he will blow up. you high? though I doubt anyone would put time bomb to blow at night 1 xD it was a joke statement really.Time bomb doesnt know when he is near death. So no.
Well I am not time bomb so I have no idea.wat time bomb knows when he will blow up. you high? though I doubt anyone would put time bomb to blow at night 1 xD it was a joke statement really.
Oh well, fair enough. Your vote felt way too random to be a bandwagon vote, anyway. No masking whatsoever.I'm not saying my reasons are great, just that I don't see a better reason to change my vote. If there is, do point me to the suspicious guy/girl. No plan B, gathering information which might turn out important later on is all you can hope to accomplish on the first Day, if you aren't extremely lucky to lynch a mafia member.
Not like I could do anything against it, sorry that I have to work![]()

Oh I read pretty much each post, but with my annoying headache I couldn't get out much. All I want is to hear who you think is suspciious, because to my knowledge there isn't anyone clearly suspicious, otherwise I would vote for him/her. Two more or less random bandwagons are still leading, should be enough of a proof that townies have no clue who to vote for, and the mafia blends in.If you're not even bothering to read the thread and be abreast of the nonsense that went on here, then I have no reason to explain myself to you. Do what you want. I really don't want to say anything about my role.
I'm not suspicious of anyone particularly...just annoyed by shit play. There's a difference.Oh I read pretty much each post, but with my annoying headache I couldn't get out much. All I want is to hear who you think is suspciious, because to my knowledge there isn't anyone clearly suspicious, otherwise I would vote for him/her. Two more or less random bandwagons are still leading, should be enough of a proof that townies have no clue who to vote for, and the mafia blends in.
He's a newbie, Kat, I think he wouldn't start to think of surviving strategies like that on day one. Plus, if I'm not mistaken, is uses the online status so it's easy for us to see when he's online lurking and stuff.What if Spectrum just came becasue he saw that we were going to vote for him and said that he couldnt be online ?
I was pointing out that the suspicion on you did not only center from your inactivity.How is it my fault if greg gets into some weird fight with xi0 and DD makes another spur of the moment vote because he got killed by xi0 last game?It's usually not the guy with the first vote on someone, but the ones who join later who are accused of bandwagoning, at least on the first day.
It felt great, but as it was a small game I had to survive long without the mafias knowing I was a time bomb (as I suspected there was a defuser :/ ) and having trust on my back (...which was hard tooHow did it feel knowing you were going to die?
).Questions like this are retarded, and we here them too often sadly.Is your role important to the town?
It would be AS random, not more random.Then give me a good reason why I should. Voting for someone else at this point would be even more random than voting for you.
Vote nanaIt felt great, but as it was a small game I had to survive long without the mafias knowing I was a time bomb (as I suspected there was a defuser :/ ) and having trust on my back (...which was hard too).
Questions like this are retarded, and we here them too often sadly.
It would be AS random, not more random.
Yep, i'm a townie thoughSo its a new role?
@Spectrum - Do you have a night role (a role that involves pm the host at night)?
Thanks, Farf <3 lolNow I'd rather vote for Nana since Lipe is here xD
I'm givin' up, so much spam ):Good luck, buddy.![]()
I came cuz i had only 2 posts and we must have at least 3 looolWhat if Spectrum just came becasue he saw that we were going to vote for him and said that he couldnt be online ?
Well yes, I don't really feel different. Not voting for someone just because he annoys me though, lol.I'm not suspicious of anyone particularly...just annoyed by shit play. There's a difference.
Fair enough, I get your point. Like I said I was extremely busy and not really in a good mood, but I admit that people could interpret it as me being suspicious. The first day is full of pulling on little straws anyway.I was pointing out that the suspicion on you did not only center from your inactivity.
Besides looking at it dd voted for xi0 because there were already two votes on him, so you were involved there even if inadvertently. gnut seemed to have 3 targets and he went with not the one he was originally against (wizzard) or the one that had the most votes (hardy) but the one you voted for. That could have easily been two players coordinating.
You came into the game, voted randomly without explanation, and then those votes against your "random" vote began picking up. This was quite uncharacteristic of you and you did not give any explanation (about your vote or your lack of activity) even though you could have (you lurked a couple times in the thread without posting). That taken altogether is a good enough reason in my view to suspect someone. You seem intent on trying to portray the suspicion on you as being based only on your inactivity when it was not, which is all im trying to say.
He can just lurk the thread as a guest without being logged in thoughHe's a newbie, Kat, I think he wouldn't start to think of surviving strategies like that on day one. Plus, if I'm not mistaken, is uses the online status so it's easy for us to see when he's online lurking and stuff.

You can choose to have your online status be private like imp did.He can just lurk the thread as a guest without being logged in though![]()