Re: MAFIA GAME 37 - DRAGON BALL - THE BATTLE FOR BALANCE
whats wrong about RP .. if he likes it let him do it
whats wrong about RP .. if he likes it let him do it
I thought Hilda-chan likes some spankingdamnit. It hurts to receive your disapproval.

Define different.Hardy is acting differently than always ?![]()
Shut up and do what you do best.Stop that silly RP Nuno, it's lame when you're the only one. If you want it so badly, suggest only RP for the next game.
I was not for randomly lynching someone. I was against the lynching of hardy and for the lynching of Mazino or lawlett. Both those had reasonable reasons which I felt the argument for hardy was weaker than the one for Mazino or lawett (logging out vs inactive).I'm stuck at work and checking this thread a bit every once in a while. And I noticed something I felt like sharing. Last games, Imp was into lynching someone randomly based on Evil's suggestion from a while ago. Now, when Nuno was randomly getting lynched (I mean, being voted/the target of the random lynch), he said that was silly and that we should try to actually find mafia. I agree with him, Nuno's votes were all silly, but I didn't get what made Imp change his mind about the random lynch. (I might take a while to check replies... Evil, be a good wife and bite me! Go back to your over 9000 degrees stove u.u)
I dunno... If he gets too mad, he might turn that S4 shit and start looking like a brazilian D:Vegeta!!!
Yes let's beat Kakarot together!! Lynch that bastard!! I do not want anal penetration to happen to me again, neither do you, surely. Aren't you tired of him always surpassing you? You are the prince of all Saiyans!! Let us team up and 2v1 Kakarot!!
Had to throw a like for that RP jokeVotekill 3c
Go back to planet Vegeta you scrub.
Oh wait... you can't![]()

That's not something you did in my caseI was not for randomly lynching someone. I was against the lynching of hardy and for the lynching of Mazino or lawlett. Both those had reasonable reasons which I felt the argument for hardy was weaker than the one for Mazino or lawett (logging out vs inactive).
I will clarify my position about this more. I am not against or for voting for someone randomly depending on the situation. I am for voting for someone randomly when there is no alternative. That is a key difference. My point about the vote against 3c being silly (I have voted for 3c randomly btw and will most likely be changing it) is because there is no active search for an alternatives. Which is what I commented on and tried to change by bringing the discussion back to narrowing down roles.
This is similar to the game 36 when I defended the vote against hardy being silly because there was an alternative that I thought was better (inactive players). In the absence of alternatives I am for a random lynching but there needs to be at least a search for an alternative before we go down the random lynch route.

I didn't like the way you reacted to your posts. Also, you taunted me.Had to throw a like for that RP joke
On a serious note that's 4 votes for me. That's interesting. People throwing themselves easily on a bandwagon.
but its ok I guess I dunno its a but different I guess nothing to talk about yet thoughIf you're gonna say something about me, show me some arguments.@Hardy ... I cant define it yet hmm I dunno you are a bit too serious than always ?but its ok I guess I dunno its a but different I guess nothing to talk about yet though
Who do you suspect the most at the moment?Had to throw a like for that RP joke
On a serious note that's 4 votes for me. That's interesting. People throwing themselves easily on a bandwagon.
Haha, that's silly, but OK. All I have done towards the random posts have been to brush them off with a joke. If you don't like RPing then why are you doing it yourself xD But yes I did taunt you kind of. Fair enough.I didn't like the way you reacted to your posts. Also, you taunted me.
inactive? lol ur first post was my votekill.such a funny guyI was not for randomly lynching someone. I was against the lynching of hardy and for the lynching of Mazino or lawlett. Both those had reasonable reasons which I felt the argument for hardy was weaker than the one for Mazino or lawett (logging out vs inactive).
I will clarify my position about this more. I am not against or for voting for someone randomly depending on the situation. I am for voting for someone randomly when there is no alternative. That is a key difference. My point about the vote against 3c being silly (I have voted for 3c randomly btw and will most likely be changing it) is because there is no active search for an alternatives. Which is what I commented on and tried to change by bringing the discussion back to narrowing down roles.
This is similar to the game 36 when I defended the vote against hardy being silly because there was an alternative that I thought was better (inactive players). In the absence of alternatives I am for a random lynching but there needs to be at least a search for an alternative before we go down the random lynch route.
So far it's still a little early. I find it too early to start a huge bandwagon, which I have become. I wouldn't have been for random collective bandwagon until a little later in the day phase. Like Imp said there has to be a certain amount of search for real suspects. I'm not sure how serious my voters are though. Imp has said he might change, so who knows. Hardy said he locked already though, that's pretty weird IMO. There's still like 10 hours left and who knows what will happen.Who do you suspect the most at the moment?

I'm still waiting for an explanation.Im gonna change my vote too![]()
no, you are not hsoting next game.In case someone cares, 7 hours left.