Games Mafia Game 56 - Dragon Ball Z: A New Threat - END GAME

[Spirit]

Votekill TSPanda

He failed my test.

 

[Copy Panda]

I think Panda is town, he plays similar to the pokemon game. His thoughts and playstyle don't seem artificial.
As for Holt, I always have trouble making out what he is, but for now I think you two are just 2 townies with a different mindset and approach to the game, so don't waste too much time on arguing.

For what it's worth, if I could, I'd always play the game like this - argue argue argue

But just by playing you attract more attention than those who don't, which is kind of a shame, but yeah

 

[Aonori]

Well guess I will vote now, just in case I dont get time to return here afterwards if I get back I might be willing to change the vote to someone else depending on how things are, for now Votekill syx

 

[Battou]

Any particular reason?

Yes, most of his posts so far

Don't be sorry. Just make sure you don't die.

I'm sort of inclined to vote for Gry. As of yet he has been the one starting bandwagons.

^ But also starts bandwagons

Wait I'm a suspect?

It must be hard watching your Mafia pals get to vote without you. Don't worry there's always tomorrow.

It also feels he's posting alot to appear as active as possible liking all the comments even if said posts accuse him

 

[Holt]

Actually if you go back, you'll find that I proposed this solution in response to YOUR post about us not letting Day 1 be random lmfao

And the reason I want you dead is that you bring up weird arguments, seemingly for the sheer purpose of wanting to argue, against a strategy that's actually not much worse than just doing nothing, which is what you want. Or not, since you also said we shouldn't just do nothing on D1 but actively participate and discuss and share thoughts on the only day we have nothing to work with.

I'm suspect of you because you contradict yourself while disagreeing with a solution to the problem you yourself brought up xd

Yes, only that your proposal wasnt to stop the randomness, only to reduce the numbers we had to work with. I questioned you on it so far, and just now do you propose how it could derandomize D1 which I asked because you never brought it up.

I see nothing weird with my theory of not killing people just to reduce numbers, because this is what you suggested we do. I did not do it to just argue. And I didn't contradict myself. And I disagreed because like I said, your solution wasn't to less randomness, but to reduce the player pool. Also, it's not a contradiction because I still maintain my stand on not killing. My solution was for more game related talk, that could potentially help us. Killing twice when you assume that we won't even get info since its random d1 is still against my idea

 

[Spirit]

Syx getting the live finally.

--- Double Post Merged, Sep 7, 2017, Original Post Date: Sep 7, 2017 ---

Love*

 

[syx]

VOTE KILL ERINYES

 

[Kato756]

This is odd. Killing a townie won't automatically make those who did Mafia. Sure there's likely to be a Mafia in there, but it won't be certain who is. It won't mean either you or panda are Mafia and thus, dead...

On the second, who do you think is Mafia? It's these thoughts I've been trying to get everyone to do

As I said, WYIS playstyle is normally my early guide in thesse situations, since he is very active, this generates lots of interactions that we can use to guide people.

That being said, from the, what, 3 or 4 games I played, on this one he seems like the most agressive, and there was that tidbit about not wanting to say anything about his role then sudennly giving a tip about his role, which coincidently is a night role that could be useful for the town, when he saw he was getting some votes.

The rest I think it is a bit too early, I mean, I could even say your style of questioning is suspicious, as is my playstyle, so aside from WYIS I don´t have any strong feelings towards anyone.

I thought Erinyes wasn't a newbie? It's not intentional from my part, but I am also trying to be honest about my insecurities about being fresh to the game (at least in it's current state). Also trying to be wary of anyone playing me like a fiddle because of it.

I have played one game at least with Erin

 

[Spirit]

I never said I had a Night Role.

 

[Jammin]

Am I the only one it strikes as odd that Panda is so focused on who to kill yet has no thoughts on who not to kill?

I mean, I think the idea of suspecting the inactives has merit if you assume they are laying low but shouldn't we townies be trying to figure out who we can trust as much as who we can't?

Like, I may be a noob to this game and all, but I'm looking at what people post and how they post it. Trying to figure out who's legit. I wouldn't go as far as trust anyone but right now there are people that I have very low suspicion of and if I had to bet right now I'd say they are townies.

@Demonspeed
@WithYouInSpirit
@GrySun

All because they seem to be at least acting like the townie side is their side. If any of them are putting on an act they are doing a good job and have me close to convinced.

 

[Copy Panda]

Yes, only that your proposal wasnt to stop the randomness, only to reduce the numbers we had to work with. I questioned you on it so far, and just now do you propose how it could derandomize D1 which I asked because you never brought it up.

Yes, so? Doesn't that make it even better? It had some upside I didn't even consider at first? All celebrate \o/

I see nothing weird with my theory of not killing people just to reduce numbers, because this is what you suggested we do. I did not do it to just argue. And I didn't contradict myself. And I disagreed because like I said, your solution wasn't to less randomness, but to reduce the player pool.

Yes, by just denying my points become moot!

Also, it's not a contradiction because I still maintain my stand on not killing. My solution was for more game related talk, that could potentially help us. Killing twice when you assume that we won't even get info since its random d1 is still against my idea

I said kill the inactives because they don't talk anyway, fyi

Also, yes, I'm assuming we're not gonna get any info from someone who posts just a few times a day, and so would prefer killing them over not killing at all. That's not to say there aren't more eligible targets etc.

You're just typing words but not actually making any points. You do realize we'll never have 100% certainty on our kill? Unless, of course, you know who the mafia is, ka

 

[Spirit]

It's getting late and I need to sleep soon. I didn't forsee so many people voting to lynch me

 

[Holt]

For what it's worth, if I could, I'd always play the game like this - argue argue argue

But just by playing you attract more attention than those who don't, which is kind of a shame, but yeah

Well, I am the same. Agree on both points. I still maintain a different approach but I'll drop this for now. I suppose a number of people will be using this as a means to go under radar as well

 

[GrySun]

Am I the only one it strikes as odd that Panda is so focused on who to kill yet has no thoughts on who not to kill?

I mean, I think the idea of suspecting the inactives has merit if you assume they are laying low but shouldn't we townies be trying to figure out who we can trust as much as who we can't?

Like, I may be a noob to this game and all, but I'm looking at what people post and how they post it. Trying to figure out who's legit. I wouldn't go as far as trust anyone but right now there are people that I have very low suspicion of and if I had to bet right now I'd say they are townies.

@Demonspeed
@WithYouInSpirit
@GrySun

All because they seem to be at least acting like the townie side is their side. If any of them are putting on an act they are doing a good job and have me close to convinced.

Maybe @Demonspeed and @Lambu should do what you did and swear on their waifu that they're town. I'd see them more as townies if they did so.
Plus, I am yet to see the depths Demon will go to to lie about his allegiance, but not putting many things past him..

 

[Spirit]

Out of all the people who I have interacted with, Panda has been the one who has tried to take advatage of my posts.

 

[Battou]

Am I the only one it strikes as odd that Panda is so focused on who to kill yet has no thoughts on who not to kill?

well is the first day, there's many suspects, but no way to know for sure who isn't a suspect, son not that odd really. Who wouldn't you killl?

 

[Spirit]

well is the first day, there's many suspects, but no way to know for sure who isn't a suspect, son not that odd really. Who wouldn't you killl?

Me. Trust me so I don't need to suspect you.

 

[Battou]

Me. Trust me so I don't need to suspect you.

Yeah im going with trusting no one as of now, thanks tho xD

 

[Kato756]

I never said I had a Night Role.

implied a night role.

At least I don´t think theres anything else that could be associated with honey outside of prostitute

 

[Demonspeed]

Am I the only one it strikes as odd that Panda is so focused on who to kill yet has no thoughts on who not to kill?

I mean, I think the idea of suspecting the inactives has merit if you assume they are laying low but shouldn't we townies be trying to figure out who we can trust as much as who we can't?

Like, I may be a noob to this game and all, but I'm looking at what people post and how they post it. Trying to figure out who's legit. I wouldn't go as far as trust anyone but right now there are people that I have very low suspicion of and if I had to bet right now I'd say they are townies.

@Demonspeed
@WithYouInSpirit
@GrySun

All because they seem to be at least acting like the townie side is their side. If any of them are putting on an act they are doing a good job and have me close to convinced.

You can trust me in this game but good Mafias are liars. That's what they do. Especially experienced ones.