I have to deal with RNG to use it effectivelyBefore the day is over, I'd like for at least the players who have given us the vaguest hints to grace us with something to base our future choices on. That means @Holt, @Aizen, @SonOfDaws, @desin24, @Belserion and @Lady pompom, but everyone else who hasn't exactly been crystal clear about it is welcome to as well.
Suggestion: what @Crescent_jinxgrace or @Lambu shared just now are good hints; "active role" or "never had it before" when you've played two games as townies are worthless hints.
Of course, it wouldn't hurt to have @syx say something more about his role too before the bandwagon gets out of control...
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I was thinking along the lines of this as well.
Yes, plus Arjuna voted for syx right after the anonymous vote. Lends credence to his hint which could make him a noble.
This does make sense. I agree more about what you said regarding Arjuna than syx, though. Syx said he likes this role more than the one he had before and I he was a doctor, seems weird to prefer politician over that, specially if you can be insane and turn tides. In any case, I agree it's worthy to spare syx, just in case.
I have to say this is the most eventful and telling Day 1 I have ever played. It’s a nice change. If anything, I’m shaking my head because there’s almost too much to go on and since I’m on my phone and at work I don’t have my notes and can’t really do a lot of backreading.
Damn, I really felt sorry for you Faffs. But that was indeed a great sacrifice and you deserve to stay longer in the game. Thank you.
It is cool man. x) Soon, everything reagrding my person will be revealed. All I can say is kudos to the mafias, you guys did well. Never thought this would turn like this honestly. And to the Townies who know about me and still went „syx so suspicious, much mafia, very red“: I forgive you.
What could I possibly say to save my ass? Sorry, I do not see it. I am not someone who usually gives up, but let us be serious, the minds of the players are pretty much set. So, cast your vote on me and let’s be done with it. I do not have a role like WYIS to kill someone right know and prove my innoncence. And I won‘t claim my role, since I doubt it will help me me the long run anyway.
First, my role can be claimed. Second, I would never do such thing to Faffs. My post to lynch Zazs was in no way, shape or form supposed to be taken seriously. I honestly think Zazs is the only one who got the joke.
As savage as ever, but for some reaon the town thinks its worth rewarding you with letting you off.
I'm very surprised about that, as one surely doesn't have to be a genius with how the game developed before and the hints given, plus considering the game theme, a game about a courtroom, with a jury - to think and be surprised about vote manipulating roles in the game is just an other boldness to shake one's head over. If any new information this gave us, its how easily triggered she is, which is a dangerous and confusing condition to play under for the town.Well, on the bright side, I still think what I said last game in a similar situation - that three penalty votes for today in exchange for the knowledge that there's a Politician or Gambler (and letting go of the stress) is a very good trade-off. I doubt anyone will be so bold as to vote you after this anyway - they'd attract a lot of suspicion for jumping on the low-hanging bandwagon, and I'd at least let you off for today especially considering the info you've given us.
Now, @Arjuna, if you're the Politician and you were trying to confirm your role claim, please make it a bit more clear that it will be what you're going for tomorrow... And by "a bit", I mean "unequivocally".
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Farfs was forced by either a Politician or Gambler to vote for Zasz, she chose to say it, and she got the penalty votes for doing so.
And an other savage remark there my dear. Why in the world would you assume that this would colour you townie.
