Player Roles
~
~
Last edited:
ThanksHere, son:
It was after Greg and James said they had 1 name and Hardy said he wasnt a traitor.
Ok but we got 1 name only. If it was that easy for people to be recruited, what would happen if a different máfia would target us, the ones with 1 name? Dunno if the hosts would change the rules like that... That we could be recruited by anyone in spite of the single name we have. Traitors aren't Sleepers.--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
My thoughts on your claims:@Hardy I think it's quite telling how you instantly jumped meI wasn't in any rush to suspect you as you could've still been town, but this changes my mind a little.
You see, this is a bit of a depressing situation. Not sure if you were there in the dead pad when I talked with others about Traitor reveals, but a Traitor revealing his list, if it's a legit list, was what I called game ruining. And now I'm in that situation myself here.
Some infos I will share: Unlike James(and maybe Kato?) I don't have one name, but three. I still don't know whether my list is legit or not, but both could be possible considering the role I have. If I'm a real Traitor then it's an interesting combo, if I'm naive then it's a massive troll from the hosts. I tried not to let myself be affected too much by it on Day 1, but I did try calling out a bit to two out of my list, while largely ignoring the third. Meanwhile playing the role I have until one of them dies and I know if I'm legit.
So not sure about revealing anything... Revealing them could be a very shitty thing to do. It's possible I also lack names and it isn't a full team, but if it is the full team then I've ruined their game with this, they'll get lynched in the next days or nightkilled while giving a huge advantage to the other team.
Continuing backreading..
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Found this weird too, not just because of my list but because it's not really covered by the rules. So I think panda is disregarding rules, again..
Who hinted doc?Sweet Christmas the setup of this game seems appropriate to expectations when you think of the hosts.
Sorry for jumping only late into the game but I was at work until now.
I agree with those above me. A janitor not being used in Night0 would be nonsense. It was most likely a recruitment which leaves us with either 2 killing parties and an unlucky insane doc or 3 killing parties. Now I think we already got hints for one doc/guardian role but there must be others as well.
Popular either gets you persecuted for instance you always mafia memeJanitor being used is more likely yes but I am not 100% sure it happened. I will assume it was the case for now.
What do you think of the fact that the two N1 deaths were not veterans(It is not their first games but I would not really call Asako or Jinx veterans). It's easy to think of a reason why Jinx got killed because of her performance in the last game but I am curious about Asako. Cause of death? TP(which one?)? Redirection? Insane Doc?
Tonight, two other people died, not three. So if there are three killing parties, maybe someone else got recruited?
Personally, I don't think I would kill veterans early like that. But if that's what my team wants...


Doc? Who?Sweet Christmas the setup of this game seems appropriate to expectations when you think of the hosts.
Sorry for jumping only late into the game but I was at work until now.
I agree with those above me. A janitor not being used in Night0 would be nonsense. It was most likely a recruitment which leaves us with either 2 killing parties and an unlucky insane doc or 3 killing parties. Now I think we already got hints for one doc/guardian role but there must be others as well.
I'll need to get home and look at the notes. At least I perceived it as a statement from someone with a protective role.Who hinted doc?
Being naive traitor doesn't automatically mean the names on your lists must be non-mafia since the names are random...and people coming out (assuming the real traitor is among them) need only to lie about their accomplice to pass off. Although I know this point was made at an earlier pointTbf to Panda, I would never put it past him to go full troll. xD
Well, we gotta wait for others to come out with their traitor claims or no traitor claims. In a way it is easy to guess who is naive and who isn't since we already got 4 dead townies, crescent being one of them who gnut said was his traitor contact as 2nd innocent child.
What I am curious about is who is the 2nd det and what results he got so far but I feel like said det gonna stay low. Or might have been the janitor kill last night for all we know.
cheekyI do agree with this. We should discuss the situation of other people before we end up lynching you.

Gry lay it all out in the open for us. Atm, there's is no better lynch than you. You mentioned potentially stalling your death (since it's supposedly low priority) in favor of killing a mafia. That's all well and good but there's none standing out atm. Also, there's quite too much stacked against you. First there's the fact that only you have 3 names as opposed to the other claims of 1. Now anyone will probably claim one. This exception is kinda too significant to ignore. Why would hosts give you 3 random names just because? Certainly some of the other claimed traitors are naive..and everyone else has 1. So your case is special. 2 things, either naive or real traitor. You've said Farf is one person on your list. Farf strongly claims she isn't mafia and tells you to reveal the others on your list. You've gotten the go ahead from her, why not let it out? I don't get the point really. Added with James' result on you, you're either a naive traitor with an inexplicable different trend from all other naive traitors or mafia. As it stands, the latter seems more likely.Will go to the cinema now, I'll be back in a few hours. If it gets necessary I will reveal my role. It's not a good role to be in the open, but my odds to survive the night aren't looking great anyway.
I'm not giving any more right now
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Because I think Hardy is lying, so I'd have to be naive. And because I'm trusting you're town.Why? D: It's a 50% change for you, your whole list is alive XD!
No. It's a lot easier a claim for people who think they're real traitors and have more names like me. If hardy isn't mafia he surely has more names too, or rather has had. He probably got recruited.I would, why wouldn't I? I wouldn't be alone @.@ I'd be the same case as you. The only ones that could be afraid of that are the ones that would be lying about it.
No, it's a shitty situation to be in. You can't just drop it and urge me not to say it, else you'd be confirming yourself as mafia and me as a real Traitor. So even if you're really mafia you'd have to keep doing what a townie would, ask me to share it and hope I don't. At least I think you would.Are you saying I wouldn't care if I would fuck up my own team? '-' What do I have to gain from that?
Have been wondering the same thing about you. Role not important, not a traitor in this game system, and panicking ever since James came with your result. But keep struggling, but people really should see past thatThe only thing I'm not getting is how you only got 1 vote so far.

--- Double Post Merged, ---
That post you're quoting was to hardy, not to Farf. It's his mafia that profits from me potentially showing her's.That argument doesn't make sense.
You said Farf was one of the names you got. So if anything it would be Farf's mafia you would reveal and thus Farf trying to get you to tell her the names would rather risk her mafia team than profit from it. Ofc you could be a 3 name naive traitor but the more 1 names we get, however many of them are for real or not, the less likely that seems to be the case.
It's likely, but I am still unrecruited, if I even can be recruited. There would be absolutely no reason for me to still come out as a Traitor if it already served it's purpose. The most likely people who have been recruited during N0 and/or N1 are the ones claiming to either have dead people as their name, or those that "are not Traitor".I reading guys but wanted to quote this while its fresh in my head.
This may explain why janitor wasnt used nite 0.....he recruited someone.
Maybe not you but someone....which tends to make me believe we indeed have 3killing parties and another mafia recruited last nite.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
In such a system I imagine they're used like Sleepers. Which would make no sense, but then again Panda is known for taking huge liberties with written rules... I don't like it.Ok but we got 1 name only. If it was that easy for people to be recruited, what would happen if a different máfia would target us, the ones with 1 name? Dunno if the hosts would change the rules like that... That we could be recruited by anyone in spite of the single name we have. Traitors aren't Sleepers.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Guilt. Even if I'm a real Traitor and not naive, Farfs teammates remain unknown and still have a shot to win this. If I'm really sane traitor I would feel awful about ruining their chances.But why won't he say the other two names then?And I did got innocent on Gry and Guilty on Hardy, one of them has to be a Mafia or a real Traitor one way or another. I don't care whenever we lynch Hardy or Gry. Gry is the only one who got 3 names as traitor and who knows, given panda is host he might just give some fake names to the real traitor to prevent a thing happening likeGry revealing 3 Mafias when discovered once the mass traitor theory is out in the open. Hardy got a role he cannot reveal or doesn't want to reveal and no traitor but it seems he is not the only one. If we lynch Hardy we get to see if he really was townie or not, if he wasn't big chance I am a real traitor or a naive traitor who happened to get a mafia as contact. If we lynch Gry, well, all we get there is if my innocent result was for real or not. Ofc there is the possibility of both being mafia with one being a traitor and the other being a mafia boss, but how likely is that to happen. xD
--- Double Post Merged, ---
I'm town uncle, ffsSame thought....also the fact you think you would be the only one to target gry 1st nite....i dont think so.
With your investigation....i leaning towards hes either a lying mafia boss and you are sane or he was recruited and you are insane.
Mafia haven't touched me yet, unless they used a non-kill role on it. Because I'm both still alive and unrecruited. As for why they wouldn't, either taking pity on me or expecting a doc to keep me safe.--- Double Post Merged, ---
I answered his post telling him it's impossible to be a strat. But he may be one of the people in the Janitor's mafia trying to hide that they recruited someone. Particularly hardy.ofc gry is one of them i would...there are a few good players i would try to kill if i had a free nite like that.
I mean no one had anything to go on as far as risking ones life to protect.
You dont agree that the janitor was used....?
I mean come on...wheres @Holt
He brought this up and gry did his best to make like it was some kind of strategy...
What fucking strategy you need when you have a free nite to claim a role...and worse case scenario in this game....gain a member
![]()
It's ok Gry, just point in the doll where the mean mafia touched you.I'm town uncle, ffsMafia haven't touched me yet, unless they used a non-kill role on it.
I could come clean, but it's really not a role I'd want to claim...Plus grys reluctancy to reveal his role if it isnt a strong one.
Usually in a game if a detective is out and he believes them....he basically demands others to reveal saying "well detective is out how important can yours be?"
![]()
. I don't have time to backread anything. Can someone explain why Hardy and GrySun have two votes?My thoughts on your claims:
So, it's hard for me to really trust that claim... At the moment, it seems more like you're lying about something in order to sell the idea that you're a native traitor which, again, would be understandable, but it still hurts your credibility. Coming clean may improve it though
- You said that after James and probably Kato revealed they only had one name so lying about receiving 3 would be a bit risky.
- Have there be a mafia that starts with 3 members in a game with THIS many traitors seems unlikely. Then again, I'm not sure "balance" was a big concern this game...
- What's more suspect is the fact that you only revealed one name AND the fact that you revealed any at all. You could have easily refused to and nobody would have questioned it much. It's an act of self-preservation and you even pointed out yourself that doing so would be "game-breaking." Still, you felt the need to one of three names.
Should've went with the flow instead of being honest, even if I seem to have slipped up earlier in a post implicating I had more names.--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I noticed it too while backreading during our hiatus. If we mean the same person that is. Would rather keep him hidden so best not say it.I'll need to get home and look at the notes. At least I perceived it as a statement from someone with a protective role.
You have two you wont share but me revealing i have 1 thats dead...now im scum xDIt's likely, but I am still unrecruited, if I even can be recruited. There would be absolutely no reason for me to still come out as a Traitor if it already served it's purpose. The most likely people who have been recruited during N0 and/or N1 are the ones claiming to either have dead people as their name, or those that "are not Traitor".
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
In such a system I imagine they're used like Sleepers. Which would make no sense, but then again Panda is known for taking huge liberties with written rules... I don't like it.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Guilt. Even if I'm a real Traitor and not naive, Farfs teammates remain unknown and still have a shot to win this. If I'm really sane traitor I would feel awful about ruining their chances.
I can hope I'm naive and tell you the other names, but if I really end up screwing over a whole team... idk james. Would you do it if you were in this position?
--- Double Post Merged, ---
I'm town uncle, ffsMafia haven't touched me yet, unless they used a non-kill role on it. Because I'm both still alive and unrecruited. As for why they wouldn't, either taking pity on me or expecting a doc to keep me safe.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
I answered his post telling him it's impossible to be a strat. But he may be one of the people in the Janitor's mafia trying to hide that they recruited someone. Particularly hardy.
Traffic jam killed me. I don't have time to backread anything. Can someone explain why Hardy and GrySun have two votes?
Would be repeating myself, you'll find answers to those questions in of my previous ~3 posts to people asking the same. I don't know why they gave me 3, but they did. You'd really believe Hardy here who's making it as simple for himself as possible?Gry lay it all out in the open for us. Atm, there's is no better lynch than you. You mentioned potentially stalling your death (since it's supposedly low priority) in favor of killing a mafia. That's all well and good but there's none standing out atm. Also, there's quite too much stacked against you. First there's the fact that only you have 3 names as opposed to the other claims of 1. Now anyone will probably claim one. This exception is kinda too significant to ignore. Why would hosts give you 3 random names just because? Certainly some of the other claimed traitors are naive..and everyone else has 1. So your case is special. 2 things, either naive or real traitor. You've said Farf is one person on your list. Farf strongly claims she isn't mafia and tells you to reveal the others on your list. You've gotten the go ahead from her, why not let it out? I don't get the point really. Added with James' result on you, you're either a naive traitor with an inexplicable different trend from all other naive traitors or mafia. As it stands, the latter seems more likely.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
No you did. Why are you lying about it now? Forgot the exact wording, but you said something about revealing it doesn't change anything for town. Would need to find the exact post, but you said it.I'm panicking?
I never said a thing about the importance of my role, you did.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Just said it was convenient. You said it among the first few so I trust you. The ones that came after you though... especially the ones that are not traitors. There have to be mafia among those for sure.You have two you wont share but me revealing i have 1 thats dead...now im scum xD
Well tomorrow will say different.but if you in a hurry....can always lynch me.
![]()
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Well, for that they would have to also believe I'm mafia, if they fear that by having 3 names instead of 1 that makes them real traitors... I think so far that's not how people feel about me, even if I'm not someone solid to be trusted. So it still looks unlikely to me that every single one with 3 names would feel like that.No. It's a lot easier a claim for people who think they're real traitors and have more names like me. If hardy isn't mafia he surely has more names too, or rather has had. He probably got recruited.
No, Gry, I really don't care... and if you said that until you'd get recruited you'd play like a townie, you shouldn't be caring either about what I could possibly be wishing deep inside... I could even promise you I'm not lying about saying you can share your list 'cause it's false, you have my word... You really have no reason to retain it.No, it's a shitty situation to be in. You can't just drop it and urge me not to say it, else you'd be confirming yourself as mafia and me as a real Traitor. So even if you're really mafia you'd have to keep doing what a townie would, ask me to share it and hope I don't. At least I think you would.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Then make us maaaaad \@.@/ You're being Kato, the second ç.ç everybody is asking you the same thing at this point lmao.This is quite tiring. It would be so easy to just reveal everything now, then let people be mad later.