- Joined
- Dec 20, 2017
- Messages
- 5,379
- Reaction score
- 3,058
- Country
-
Dude, he just stated it lol..
No, you have to prove he was shocked because he arm got taken off, It could be either but you made the statement, you have to show he was shocked because he lost his arm.
You haven't proved that the Ruler was on when he lost his arm, in fact, you can't prove it was on.
No, I clearly pointed out the reason he could have been surprised was because he never expected Melidoas to active his innate ability.
No, the burden is still on you. You made the claim and you haven't proved it, saying it was on because it's on most of the time isn't solid evidence since we see him turn it off right before. You have failed to prove he turned it back on.
You've lost this argument and are only continuing because you're stubborn. You lost this argument because you act like it was confirmed Meliodas overpowered the Ruler, while there's no concrete evidence or strong implications to support that. Me, on the other hand, I'm simply saying you can't prove that the Ruler was activated when that happened because there's nothing showing that. I'm not saying it definitely was active but I'm not saying it wasn't either, you know why? Because the manga was ambiguous about it, unlike you.
You can't read the page and the atmosphere?
Because losing instantly his arm isn't shocking? Wow the denial lol.
Like I said, I already proved it but you ignored it, in fact in this case, the burden of proof is on you so.ce turn in off is a special case for him, he had always on lol.
I like how you keep spouting nonsense like: " You lost! You lost ! "
Reflecting only your anxiety lol.
