The first point is quite subjective but Jump's policy has always been to throw a lot of stuff at the wall and see what sticks. The editors have said that the hurdle to get into the magazine is much lower than actually staying in the magazine. With regards to being stricter, stuff like Act-age could possibly have been lost if they didn't give them a little rope. Kimetsu is another case of a slow starter that while it was getting results, it slowly gained its fanbase. Nakano has said that there are more series now that take a little while to take off and struggle a bit in the beginning.
These campaigns are they're way of making sure every series that shows potential is given enough exposure and opportunity to take off. Hits don't always just happen, especially now when there are many more choices of entertainment for people. These campaigns are ways for people to at least see these series and try them out.
I know the talk about quality is subjective
& I had a feeling the par for entry is pretty low, I'm saying imo it shouldn't be, this is the biggest manga magazine in the world so you can afford to only publish well-polished work with diverse themes
in regards to being strict, I'm aware we might lose on manga with a slow start like KnY or AA and I'd still take that risk if i was them
under the previous regime huge hits like KnB, AssClass, Hq, BnHA have managed to break through in a super competitive environment and I don't see why a well polished work wouldn't be able to today
in regards to campaigns, i understand this is a business promoting its products, but do they really have to do it in this manner? if you call everything "the next big thing" then nothing is
other magazines (with lower circulation and fewer readers) have generated hits without the need for a new campaign every other week
Let's go through these one by one.
1. Literally no series of the modern era has HAD a high first print run. In an era where crazy "Whoa, I've never seen stuff like this!" reactions isn't a thing, you kinda have to work on building a fandom.
2. As Ice-Emperor pointed out, that's just basic marketing. Working everything under a theme helps also figure out what does/doesn't work, and allows you to plan ahead.
3. By that point Jump's gag manga situation was critical, and I imagine launching David and Japan at the same time was a gimmick intended to cover for Sorachi leaving. Didn't work, but what have you.
4. Again, that's just how planning works. Tough luck on the GFC entrants, but what have you.
5. Again, resoundingly petty point. So what if that's what the ToC is like? The magazine is 75% battle manga already, of course there's going to be overlap.
6. Yui and Taisei have literally nothing in common beyond a split personality gimmick which is handled in very different ways. Poor example.
All in all, your points seem remarkably minor and petty and revolve entirely around trying to poke holes in Nakano's character over small things. Maybe, instead of leveling your bias, you actually consider getting a firmer argument.
1-your opinion
2-what you said doesn't apply to what i complained about, you're just saying buzzwords you don't know what it means
3-your opinion
4-fuck them for wanting the referees to be fair, amirite
5-he shouldn't have said what he can't back
6-their gimmick is their whole sale point and hook, poor counter argument
i have never criticized Nak the hack character, only his work, don't put word in my mouth