

Basically he saying it's ok as long as it ain't gay.I think I need a translator, I have no idea what you are trying to say.

I'm not going to call BS and suggest that there's no way that you have these things on your mind when you think of something as simple as a kiss... but for the majority of people that's almost certainly not the case.There is a huge difference between a heterosexual kiss from a homosexual kiss, it's not how's done, but that it's the stepping stone to a relationship that will possible have an offspring, more than just a child is the genes transmission that i'm trying to focus here. As a life being, that's pretty much the mission in life of every being in existence, and i want to fulfill that mission with the right one.
I missed the reason „why“ in it thoughBasically he saying it's ok as long as it ain't gay.
Yiikes.
Because it doesn‘t lead to offspring? That‘s quite a dedication to overpopulation.Not to mention, barely anyone bats an eye at the idea of a man kissing an unconscious woman, but somehow a same-sex kiss is supposed to be a bad thing?Kids movies have had romantic gestures, such as kisses, for centuries. It is as "sexual" as Prince Charming kissing Snow White.
It is a gesture of romantic love between people, and I think people are allowed to fall in love whomever they fall in love with.
The fact that you see a problem here and somehow instantly make it a "sexual thing in childrens movie", just proves that you have a some sort of an knot in your mind, where a plain kiss signals something more than a connection of love (you right away start to think about about sex).
Fukit....im gonna get shitfaced....
Oh wishing her a speedy recovery from corona!Eldest has Corona - but is obnoxiously healthy
I don't hate my kids enough to subject them to that filthOh wishing her a speedy recovery from corona!
Unless you mean the beer which in that case is very odd
Basically he saying it's ok as long as it ain't gay.
Yiikes.
Here is a mistake to me.I'm not going to call BS and suggest that there's no way that you have these things on your mind when you think of something as simple as a kiss... but for the majority of people that's almost certainly not the case.
It's like saying interactions that don't have the endgoal of having offspring are also "wrong" and shouldn't be shown to kids either.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
This would've been a very good point to argue against feminism complaining about "guy healing girl through kiss without wishing to get well", but you threw it as a joke, and it's pretty boring actually.Not to mention, barely anyone bats an eye at the idea of a man kissing an unconscious woman, but somehow a same-sex kiss is supposed to be a bad thing?
Tells you everything you need to know about these people![]()
Okay and that is homophobicI'm saying it's ok to be gay, when the shit is not directed at children.
It doesn't change what you said, it's just extrapolating what you said to another example. If you're consistent like that, then I think that's odd, but fair enough. If it doesn't apply to the situation I mentioned, then it's hypocritical IMO and has nothing to do with procreation and everything to do with gayness.Here is a mistake to me.
The first sentence proves the simplity of the act of kissing, that people should only consider what's given to them.
The second sentence argues a situation that changes what i said and reorganize words from my sayings, and people (may include you) will get that have gay relationships are wrong.
So, what do we keep? accepting without asking or analyze ideas about stuff delivered to us. In order to continue.
Not to mention, barely anyone bats an eye at the idea of a man kissing an unconscious woman, but somehow a same-sex kiss is supposed to be a bad thing?
Tells you everything you need to know about these people![]()
![]()
Oh wishing her a speedy recovery from corona!
Unless you mean the beer which in that case is very odd

Which part?Okay and that is homophobic
Yep... but that wasn't my approach for this topic.An opposite sex kiss in a kids movie doesn't turn people straight, and a same sex kiss in a movie doesn't turn people gay.
I think your upper part is answered above in my post, let me know if i got it bad, or want to go further with it.It doesn't change what you said, it's just extrapolating what you said to another example. If you're consistent like that, then I think that's odd, but fair enough. If it doesn't apply to the situation I mentioned, then it's hypocritical IMO and has nothing to do with procreation and everything to do with gayness.
There's nothing wrong with asking or analyzing. But we should also look inward and wonder why something bothers us too.
It's not THAT badI don't hate my kids enough to subject them to that filth
I mean, gayness is one thing
foul Mexican 'beer'...
![]()
All above. Because 2 negates 1, and makes it false. "It's okay to be gay, as long as (my) children don't see any in public or in media". That means you place homosexual relationships into unequal standing in comparison to heteronormative relationships. So it's ok to be gay, only if it happens in my terms, out of my children's sight. Which means expressing homosexuality isn't okay.Which part?
1-It's ok to be gay
2-When the shit is not directed a children?
Or the whole phrase? Or just calling the gay movement as "shit" makes me homophobic?
So you seriously think, that making children aware thorough media that gay people exists (as they do) leads to children to not learning how babies are made or what is marriage? There is a billion on children's films on those subject, and a gay kiss in one film wont negate that. Learning one thing doesn't negate learning another thing. You can do both math and art in school. Your logic makes absolutely zero sense.Yep... but that wasn't my approach for this topic.
Being gay is something that happens to few people, it's hardly a natural thing that happens in the body (meant hardly for the number of ppl being gay), but obviously must be acknowledged... as a topic after other topics such as marriage, couples, creating bonds to ensure genes transmission.
What is this obsession with sex? We are still talking about a children's movie of space rangers fighting alien robots? What has "passing of genes" to anything with that? The kids will have biology, health and sex education in their lives later, when it is more topical. Having this kind of exposure just makes kids see, that some boys like boys and thats that - they'll just be less likely to judgmental and rude when they encounter this later in adult life.That's why i separated hetero from homo, both kisses can be the first step to sex... but only one of them allows genes transmission, a nature's truth. The concepts i posted before go in hand with that... but an homosexual kiss doesn't.
Whats so sad about it?Hmm, sadly we don't know why people tends to be gay u_u
And surely we will never know.
That's homophobic as fuck. Straight people can be in media, but gay people can't because it hurts the children and some peoples feelings? So gay people should just pretend to not exist?Honestly i hate movements that want to put an establishment for not just us, but for everybody. That's part of my contempt for the topic we're talking about now, because one of the wealthiest companies in the world is doing it, it will leave a spot... in people learning how to think, children. Specially, i love people that are able to keep their privacy for them, including gays ofcourse. But when they want to change the world, i'm against them.
Don't worry there buddy. As a Russian passport holder it is in my current state's agenda to disappoint people all around the world wide (wide web).What the hell?? Evil, how come now i'm only 'he'. Never expected it from you.
I really don't have the energy to argue about simple human rights and dignity of every single being, but here's the double standard I am going to point out to you.So, what do we keep? accepting without asking or analyze ideas about stuff delivered to us.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
They've been censored out of history for millenia now, let's just leave it at that.So gay people should just pretend to not exist?
