So you are claimimg active?
What you said only makes sense if nobody claimed, with 2 actives claimes you claimimg active won't help mafia find an active to kill.
@AwkwardMisha my theory makes sense if you consider the link you created to brandish, what if we both vote brandish to get you cleared for tomorrow? What would you think of a plan like that?
I can but not feeling like it for now. I'm not big on the hint department, especially when it's all active/passive bs. Dunno how does that help when there are plenty of passive and especially active roles to fake. Mafia will just go and kill one of the active hoping to get lucky on a good role.
Well you said you were reading through the MG roles not that you were reading up on your role. It sounded in general rather than specific which is why I found it interesting. Could just be how I interpret things. Guess we'll see.
So you are claimimg active?
What you said only makes sense if nobody claimed, with 2 actives claimes you claimimg active won't help mafia find an active to kill.
@AwkwardMisha my theory makes sense if you consider the link you created to brandish, what if we both vote brandish to get you cleared for tomorrow? What would you think of a plan like that?
I'm not claiming anything. If mafia wants to know they will have to use a m.det on me
It does make sense. I'm saying that generally, I don't see how it helps town claiming active or passive, but it might slightly help mafia while picking the kill.
I don't understand why you want to lynch someone that hasn't appeared and might be subbed or hostkilled.
Roger, don't claim, keep yourself open to claiming all roles in the game, that will make town trust you and m.det waste an action on you, it a perfect plan, why do we even bother taking I wonder xD
@AwkwardMisha my theory makes sense if you consider the link you created to brandish, what if we both vote brandish to get you cleared for tomorrow? What would you think of a plan like that?
Hmmm, interesting proposition, but do you really want to start a bandwagon on someone who has not even replied to the forum?
I would like to hear a bit from @Brandish μ before coming to any final conclusion.
My main issue is that there is not a lot to rely on at the moment.
The only suspicious response I have is Xad with his "I have not had the role before, so it's hard for me to claim anything"
or Jinx, due to the simple fact that she is relying on theories without even regarding a proper response.
The day isn't over, he could show up in the last min, cast a vote and get his way, until he gets penalty votes, I give him no green pass.
Not the first time xad slips day 1, he is also a very interesting case, I'm still considering.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Xad is being weird for sure:
- Claims not reading the thread
- Claims reading roles
- Later confirms he did read that demon was passive, even tho he missed it the first time and claiming he doesn't read.
- The only person he found suspecious was misha, he agreed with jinx comment.
- Didn't vote his only suspect, did a placeholder vote on the person he agreed with.
@votekill xad for now.
In case I die tonight, if brandish or misha flip mafia, check the other.
Raven - no hint, random joke vote on Erin (not bolded, so it does not count, unsure if that was the plan and is just waiting for a bandwagon)
Xad - weird response, instead of affirming he never had the role he could have informed on if the role is active or passive, no further information
Juviii - ominous response, might be a hint
Brandish - no hint, random vote, should be back at the end of the day, easy bandwagon
Jinx - no hint, random vote, maybe hoping a bandwagon due to heated argument, laying low
Belserion -Although challenged Xad on the role, no hint
I know the theory is that the mafia usually lays low so my sus list would go:
Xad, Jinx, Raven
Neutral sus, stil sus: Bel, Brandish
I do not know Bel's play style as I am on and off from the forums, i would appreciate a bit of insight from others
The day isn't over, he could show up in the last min, cast a vote and get his way, until he gets penalty votes, I give him no green pass.
Not the first time xad slips day 1, he is also a very interesting case, I'm still considering.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Xad is being weird for sure:
- Claims not reading the thread
- Claims reading roles
- Later confirms he did read that demon was passive, even tho he missed it the first time and claiming he doesn't read.
- The only person he found suspecious was misha, he agreed with jinx comment.
- Didn't vote his only suspect, did a placeholder vote on the person he agreed with.
@votekill xad for now.
In case I die tonight, if brandish or misha flip mafia, check the other.
My playstyle is that I don't like hinting on day 1. Never have, never will. When I do it I do it reluctantly. Like now. So in the spirit of cooperation here's my hint:
I've had the role before, twice, and both times it's been indirectly.
Well you said you were reading through the MG roles not that you were reading up on your role. It sounded in general rather than specific which is why I found it interesting. Could just be how I interpret things. Guess we'll see.
The only suspicious response I have is Xad with his "I have not had the role before, so it's hard for me to claim anything"
or Jinx, due to the simple fact that she is relying on theories without even regarding a proper response.
Tried reading the thread while I was attending the swimming lessons of my kids, navigating the forum on a phone is a bitch (first time in years I've tried it), that's how I missed several posts, including that one. Later I re-read the thread, everything in it.
Didn't have a suspect, still don't really. I agree with no one so far since there's not really anything to go on. I voted her because she thought Xander would fit me, aka, funny placeholder vote.
@Brandish μ@Raven@Juviii have yet to vote, please cast your vote before the end of the day. Raven your previous vote won't be taken into consideration because it wasn't bolded.