Games Mafia Game 125 - PSYCHO-PAN - End Game

[shinobi]

Votekill Vandred

Good job whoever stopped the kill

 

[Erinyes]

Votekill vandead

I'm at work guys wont be back before 5 or 6 hours , i need analysts results.

 

[shinobi]

I'm at work guys wont be back before 5 or 6 hours , i need analysts results.

gomen, I don't have anything good for you. The one I targeted has 0 points!

 

[Brandish μ]

Enforcers -
Evil - > , used an action but didnt block wojak
Farfalla - > won't share what action but didnt block wojak
Tatsu, Holt

The way I read farfalla's post is her target was not wojak, block not specifically called out

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024, Original Post Date: Oct 21, 2024 ---

vandead

This first up vote requirement is brutal lmao

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024 ---

The prio will need to be factored in the score accounting.

 

[Vandred]

Votekill wojak with yesterday's reasoning. Now that block claim is weird to say to least. No death is nice, wondering if the two are related.

As for me, I'm aware of how it looks and must be one of the weirdest situations I've found myself in. I didn't get any explanation from the hosts other than the bare minimum that everyone can read on the hostkill, so the only logical conclusion I can come up with is that Juvs actually pulled off a 400 IQ bait as mafia, either because she somehow knew what she shouldn't be able to know, or she gambled with reverse psychology and it got both Gry and me. With the tiny detail that anything involving PMs is against the rules.

The ??? doesn't help prove my case, which I understand from the hosts' perspective as damage control given what the situation must be like for the rest of the mafia. It's something only I can know but a lynch on me is a townie mislynch, so I'll still keep trying to go for who I think is likely to be mafia, regardless of the inevitable train.

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024, Original Post Date: Oct 21, 2024 ---

gomen, I don't have anything good for you. The one I targeted has 0 points!

I assume the target is someone who's supposed to have 0 points after D1?

 

[Farfalla]

OK, so night 1:

Analysts -
wojak -> targetted Sam, but was blocked
shino, sam, lambu

Enforcers -
Evil - > , used an action but didnt block wojak
Farfalla - > won't share what action but didnt block wojak
Tatsu, Holt

is there anything else we can analyze? points? I lynched a townie +100, used action +50, was top poster -50, should be 100

Mine should be 150 (yours minus top poster), depending on how much I got targeted.

gomen, I don't have anything good for you. The one I targeted has 0 points!

Uhhhh so someone that isn't top poster, voted, posted 5 times, didn't lynch Gry, didn't kill, didn't get targeted twice or more and didn't use an action.
I think it's quite relevant to know who that is, I don't see a reason to guard that info, we could find a liar there.

 

[digitaldude]

votekill vandred juvii used the old get hostkilled to reveal the mafia strat, very nice

 

[Tatsumaki]

I should be at 50 points (for using a non killing night action)

 

[Evil3ye]

gomen, I don't have anything good for you. The one I targeted has 0 points!

So basically you are saying you targetted Erin or digital, the two greens. And why?

 

[shinobi]

So basically you are saying you targetted Erin or digital, the two greens. And why?

No?

I assume the target is someone who's supposed to have 0 points after D1?

If you also mean Erin or DD then no!

Uhhhh so someone that isn't top poster, voted, posted 5 times, didn't lynch Gry, didn't kill, didn't get targeted twice or more and didn't use an action.
I think it's quite relevant to know who that is, I don't see a reason to guard that info, we could find a liar there.

So it seems. I can tell the target now, I'm just wondering if it's worth it to wait or not!

 

[Farfalla]

I can tell the target now, I'm just wondering if it's worth it to wait or not!

But what benefit you're picturing in postponing that's leading you to wonder about it?

 

[Holt]

Votekill Van. Great night, we have more room with eliminating liars per claim. I might be missing it but why is the point of not targeting Wojak relevant?

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024, Original Post Date: Oct 21, 2024 ---

Votekill wojak with yesterday's reasoning. Now that block claim is weird to say to least. No death is nice, wondering if the two are related.

As for me, I'm aware of how it looks and must be one of the weirdest situations I've found myself in. I didn't get any explanation from the hosts other than the bare minimum that everyone can read on the hostkill, so the only logical conclusion I can come up with is that Juvs actually pulled off a 400 IQ bait as mafia, either because she somehow knew what she shouldn't be able to know, or she gambled with reverse psychology and it got both Gry and me. With the tiny detail that anything involving PMs is against the rules.

The ??? doesn't help prove my case, which I understand from the hosts' perspective as damage control given what the situation must be like for the rest of the mafia. It's something only I can know but a lynch on me is a townie mislynch, so I'll still keep trying to go for who I think is likely to be mafia, regardless of the inevitable train.

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024, Original Post Date: Oct 21, 2024 ---

I assume the target is someone who's supposed to have 0 points after D1?

It’s unethical ofc but the hostkill basically confirms she wasn’t lying. After all it wouldn’t apply if it wasn’t in pm

 

[shinobi]

But what benefit you're picturing in postponing that's leading you to wonder about it?

Not sure honestly, only considering things. But anyway I have to leave now and I'll be away for a few hours so I'll just say it now! I checked Lambu, got that he has 0 points.

 

[Brandish μ]

I might be missing it but why is the point of not targeting Wojak relevant?

wojak claimed he's blocked (no analysis).

 

[Evil3ye]

I might be missing it but why is the point of not targeting Wojak relevant?

I think you do, because we are trying to figure out if wojak is lying or not by discrediting his no result. To me it seems fairly unlikely the mafia blocker would go for a random analyst and waste one of their two blocks.

Not sure honestly, only considering things. But anyway I have to leave now and I'll be away for a few hours so I'll just say it now! I checked Lambu, got that he has 0 points.

Now that's interesting, because he should be having points if he analed someone.

 

[Holt]

I think you do, because we are trying to figure out if wojak is lying or not by discrediting his no result. To me it seems fairly unlikely the mafia blocker would go for a random analyst and waste one of their two blocks.

wojak claimed he's blocked (no analysis).

Yeah I missed that somehow. I didn’t target him either

 

[Evil3ye]

Yeah I missed that somehow. I didn’t target him either

What did you do at night?

 

[Erinyes]

@SirSamuel016 @Lambu what did you do tonight ?

--- Double Post Merged, Oct 21, 2024, Original Post Date: Oct 21, 2024 ---

Oi guys , try to reach quickly 300+ so I can use my role Asap Do your best so I can spill some blood !

 

[Vandred]

If you also mean Erin or DD then no!

Only the four who voted Gry would have gained points, so I was including everyone else except for Brandish.

So who do you think are the scum among the other three Analysts?

Now that's interesting, because he should be having points if he analed someone.

The action pic in the OP states the points are tallied at the end of phase, so unless it's some roundabout interpretation, Lambu should have shown 0, no?

 

[wojak]

At some point we should talk about there being four analyst claims. As of now I find Shino trustworthy. I have been wrong about Sam in the past but I still find him sus. And Lambu having 0 points according to Shino is also very sus.

With this I go to sleep. Will check things when I’m awake. Good night chuds and chudettes