Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - END GAME

[SirSamuel016]

Hardy/Vali/Sam are on my shitlist rn.

Me??? When you trusted me yesterday?

Sam - Want more, give him a chance to powersam

Bit of a dramatic switch-up

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 10:14 AM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 10:13 AM ---

omo

can the shit and actually something meaningful cunt

 

[Kakoha]

so I believe you and Kako binding me to my first suspect list

binding you ?
1st thing, it's not a list, it's just you suspecting lawl, just lawl, not really a list
second, you said piling votes is sus, then after that you changed your vote from someone who piled his vote to someone who didn't XD
just make it make sense

 

[Copy Panda]

Poisoner, Recruitment, or a protect/failed kill?

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 1:16 AM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 1:14 AM ---

Gotta say that end of day pissed me off big time though

Copan continually acting fucking slower than a lobotomised goldfish to feign not being up to speed, him and Nash voting Lawl, and there was more that I took issue with too.

Gut feel says Copan/Nash/Pom maf atm; at least Lawl can do something as restless spirit but the case to lynch him felt incredibly disingenuine

? i was busy

and what was i slow about? i was asking questions and having them answered rather than go back and forth between pages trying to find it myself. when i entered the thread, there were 49mins left. or would you rather i not post at all? then you'd complain how lack of activity is atypical

 

[Kakoha]

Point out which “contradictory things” I said. I changed who I suspected, how is that contradictory? Besides Lawl received a lot of heat for a lynch, which made me drop him as an option, how is that contradictory?

oh I just pointed that out. not that hard

 

[Natasha]

Me??? When you trusted me yesterday?

Bro

Votelock Nash
--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 12:30 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 12:29 PM ---
backing my gut on nash but might regret not going bhai

You potshot me to tie me with Lawl & Copan, then come back to thread looking to axe Copan like you didn't just try to kill me AND ALSO USE RHETORIC AGAINST OTHERS THAT APPLIES TO YOU TOO

you thought lynching an active role that could've been important was better than going after a suspicious person with a passive claim??

SAM YOU STINK

 

[Kakoha]

I think you defend Panda too much. Also shading hardy and me at the same time.

1 post is defending but hardy making 4 posts is not even in ur list of too much hmm

 

[Natasha]

You flung a shitvote on me when I was a wagon only because Tatsu was still afk

You decided to singlehandedly tie me with a now flipped town and Copan who is part of the "passive sus persons" you claim needed lynching

Now you're flinging bum warm choco at people for voting out an active claimer and pretend I should still be trusting you or that copan did anything worse than you did after you forced me to self pres on lawl ???

 

[SirSamuel016]

? i was busy

and what was i slow about? i was asking questions and having them answered rather than go back and forth between pages trying to find it myself. when i entered the thread, there were 49mins left. or would you rather i not post at all? then you'd complain how lack of activity is atypical

Slow as in not sharp at all you bum Even now you seem performative because there's no way that you aren't more switched on given the standard you hold yourself to

Your questioning seemed incredibly disingenuine to me. Like I was actively screaming answers to you and everything in real time yet it was like you're cognitively on dial-up instead of 5G with how you were "catching up" when there was fuck all time left and you needed to be playing more in the moment. I just find it hard to believe that you're town when the signs of scumpan are there.

Bro

Sis

You potshot me to tie me with Lawl & Copan, then come back to thread looking to axe Copan like you didn't just try to kill me AND ALSO USE RHETORIC AGAINST OTHERS THAT APPLIES TO YOU TOO

Yes, I did because I didn't think Lawl should die and at that point I recall you needing a shower something fierce because I was thinking you were stinky. I could've gone for the panda and probably should've but ye I went with my gut on the matter.

ND ALSO USE RHETORIC AGAINST OTHERS THAT APPLIES TO YOU TOO

ngl in the moment I forgot that you were active but you gave me more reason to doubt you based on your reasoning.

but my bad

SAM YOU STINK

no u

 

[Copy Panda]

He went from mech talk and shitposting to feigning more activity when I'd think he'd have a better grasp of things than what he was letting on.

what mech talk, theres no mech? and what feigned activity, i was just participating?

0/2 on intuition given what I am and what Lawl turned up as with Hardy yet to be verified. One of my big issues with you, Copan, and the rest that were busting Lawl's balls was over the wording of "tricky" that he used. That shouldn't have been as big a reason to push him as it ended up being, yet apparently an active role that requires good targeting from his hinting "sounded like a mafia role." I find that to be a bit dubious.

I'll give you credit that you didn't lynch Lawl in the end, but I just don't know if I believe some of your lines of thought to be genuine town. What probably does look good for you though is that you are at least talking through your thinking a bit now and the pivot to Kako.

outside of my read on tatsu, no one else at the end offered a specific concrete reason to vote anyone else. at least i voted to save myself. if i have to do so to kill a "tricky" role claimer that really could have been anything so be it.

you seem to forget btw ive already claimed a role, same as you. we could even argue these roles are "tricky". if you were in my spot and i in lawls, surely you'd have voted the same way

 

[Kakoha]

So Kakoha can't be in the same team as Panda or Nash.

oh great, so if either panda or nash flip red, I'm confirmed. cool

 

[SirSamuel016]

You flung a shitvote on me when I was a wagon only because Tatsu was still afk

You decided to singlehandedly tie me with a now flipped town and Copan who is part of the "passive sus persons" you claim needed lynching

Now you're flinging bum warm choco at people for voting out an active claimer and pretend I should still be trusting you or that copan did anything worse than you did after you forced me to self pres on lawl ???

I didn't force you to lynch Lawl because the panda was right fucking there too- you lynching Lawl was your call. You and Panda were tied with 1 lock and 1 regular vote each, while Lawl was behind on 2 regular votes but then you locked on him. So don't act like you didn't have an alternative there.

You're on me for voting an active but in the end you lynched one instead of going for Pan soooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[Hardy]

pretty sure I explain here, idk why you're asking again.
since the beginning I said I voted for lawl but I might change. I literally did everything I said I would, what do you want more ?
from your and pom's behaviors last day, I was not even that sus of lawl anymore as u can see in the post I posted last day that u intentionally skipped (why else would u ask again if u did not skip it)
anyways, your behavior last day was the scummiest hardy, knowing how you play, you would NEVER bet that much on someone being town without being sure they are town.
also, why did you not change on panda or nash to save lawl ? you were around in the last mins of the day, and you posted even after nash changed on lawl (instead of panda which is also an interesting thing to keep in mind)
and yet you chose panda over lawl.
hardy, I played with you as mafia and I know how you play as mafia, and this is the mafia hardy I know XD

lawl death benifits you so much, so either panda is your teammate or u just did not interviene because why would you ?

Because it's dumb as rocks to do that at the end of the day with 10 minutes to go. You weren't suspicious of Lawl nor Panda but left both as top voted and moved on a tangent that you refused to elaborate (I even asked you to explain and you didn't).

This is AT LEAST the 4th time I'm saying this. I did not bet Lawl was town, this is arguing in bad faith. Go read back and bring those posts. My issue was that the 3 votes on him at the time all had BAD ARGUMENTS to the point both you and Pom admitted so and moved the vote away. Of the 3 bad arguments I voted for the person that seemingly didn't even have his own arguments. I'VE EXPLAINED THIS ALREADY.

I didn't do a second because I'm a moron and thought we had 20 minutes more, even asked pom to elaborate when it was the final minute... The day ended at 9:40 and days usually end at sharp times. But like I said I'm not sure where it would had gone because your switch changed my world view.

 

[Natasha]

Yes, I did because I didn't think Lawl should die and at that point I recall you needing a shower something fierce because I was thinking you were stinky. I could've gone for the panda and probably should've but ye I went with my gut on the matter.

I could respect this if my wagon was anything other than an afk vote on me

You understood I wouldn't join on Copan with you and that voting me effectively makes me vote Lawl

So you get to have Lawl lynched, keep your strawman copan in the running to rag on and wash yourself of voting wrong

 

[Kakoha]

Again I wasn't even particularly trusting him, I just didn't like the votes on him and I'm sure I was right.

omg, I'm really lazy to go backreading and pull you 4 or 5 posts (idk maybe more) that were defending lawl to the heart
but you're forcing my hand here. if someone else can do it it would be a pleasure.

maybe @SirSamuel016 ?

 

[SirSamuel016]

what mech talk, theres no mech? and what feigned activity, i was just participating?

*Meta talk:

in such a small game, is it better everyone claims right now? the odds of specific trap roles that need to remain hidden are markedly lower

outside of my read on tatsu, no one else at the end offered a specific concrete reason to vote anyone else. at least i voted to save myself. if i have to do so to kill a "tricky" role claimer that really could have been anything so be it.

you seem to forget btw ive already claimed a role, same as you. we could even argue these roles are "tricky". if you were in my spot and i in lawls, surely you'd have voted the same way

Why did you vote Lawl instead of Nash?

I wouldn't call Vanilla tricky tbh, just lock in and give it your best crack

 

[Natasha]

I didn't force you to lynch Lawl because the panda was right fucking there too- you lynching Lawl was your call.

If I made you to pick between someone you trust and don't to save yourself you'd be calling this forced too

I'm pissed that I was wrong on Lawl but I'm even more pissed you didn't leave me the option to go for anyone else while also feeling like I'm gonna get flash wagoned

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 10:29 AM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 10:28 AM ---

AT LEAST ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY MAN

 

[SirSamuel016]

If I made you to pick between someone you trust and don't to save yourself you'd be calling this forced too

I'm pissed that I was wrong on Lawl but I'm even more pissed you didn't leave me the option to go for anyone else while also feeling like I'm gonna get flash wagoned

What was trustworthy about Pan?

 

[Marmalade]

I don't think its been a focus "all day", just one or two posts about him.
But yes, it feels too much like an act

Who else is concerning you currently?

I never said it's been a focus all day, I thought English is your first language Sam I just said let's not make it one and look everywhere to make a balanced decision. I'm not done with my reread situation so I'll get back to your question in a little bit~

 

[SirSamuel016]

AT LEAST ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY MAN

At the risk of being accused of ragebaiting, I can't submit your vote for you and to me you had a choice to change your mind and go Copan.

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 10:31 AM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 10:30 AM ---

omg, I'm really lazy to go backreading and pull you 4 or 5 posts (idk maybe more) that were defending lawl to the heart
but you're forcing my hand here. if someone else can do it it would be a pleasure.

maybe @SirSamuel016 ?

ye lemme go digging

Sorry @Natasha I'll get back to you soon

 

[Hardy]

omg, I'm really lazy to go backreading and pull you 4 or 5 posts (idk maybe more) that were defending lawl to the heart
but you're forcing my hand here. if someone else can do it it would be a pleasure.

maybe @SirSamuel016 ?

I have like 20 posts at most it's not hard.

From the top of my head the only compliment I gave him was the fact that he was willing to do something different. The rest was arguing against the 3 bad votes you placed.