Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - Day 3

[Copy Panda]

You know I was literally brunching with friends, try again with real questions mister.

You have friends?

 

[Vali x lucifer]

I'll go to bed in about 2 hrs so I'll vote before end of day. As things stand i would vote Panda but if people want me to go Nash or Sam I'll do it even tho i don't feel great about it but it is what it is.

 

[Hardy]

Sam is a strong player, I am not taking him at face value, say for example he knew that Lawl and Panda were Town and wanted to remain out of the spotlight while securing a Lynch on either of them, forcing Nat to lock on them would be the play a Mafia Sam would make imo. Then again, it's only one of the possible scenarios, we got little to go off for now.

But then Sam cannot be in the same team as Panda and Nash who are your other 2 suspects? Or did I misunderstand?

Hilarious that Sam gets called strong to then be suspected.

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 8:52 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 8:51 PM ---

You have friends?

"Brunching with friends" sounds like something someone 50+ would do hmmmm

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 8:59 PM ---

Nash had 1
Panda had 2
Lawl had 3

Sam locks on Nash

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3

Kakoha removes his vote

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 2

Nash locks on Lawl

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3 (lynched)

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 8:59 PM ---

Why are you singling Sam's vote and ignoring Kakoha's?

 

[Vali x lucifer]

Nash had 1
Panda had 2
Lawl had 3

Sam locks on Nash

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3

Kakoha removes his vote

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 2

Nash locks on Lawl

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3 (lynched)

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 8:59 PM ---

Why are you singling Sam's vote and ignoring Kakoha's?

Actually i missed this timing, you are right, need to reevaluate a bit but i probably won't flip on Kako today at least, also i feel even less willing to Lynch Sam so it's probably between Panda and Nash for my day 2 as of now

 

[Tatsumaki]

Nash had 1
Panda had 2
Lawl had 3

Sam locks on Nash

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3

Kakoha removes his vote

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 2

Nash locks on Lawl

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3 (lynched)

Dunno if it matters in your argument but when Sam locks Nat, they're all at two. Then Pan votes lawl (right after Sam votes nat) so he's at 3 then kako removes his vote so he's at 2 again, then Nat votes lawl and he' back at 3.

 

[Hardy]

Dunno if it matters in your argument but when Sam locks Nat, they're all at two. Then Pan votes lawl (right after Sam votes nat) so he's at 3 then kako removes his vote so he's at 2 again, then Nat votes lawl and he' back at 3.

Oh I flipped that, I went by memory.

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 9:36 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 9:34 PM ---

Nash had 1
Panda had 2
Lawl had 2

Sam locks on Nash

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 2

Panda votes on Lawl

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3

Kakoha removes his vote

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 2

Nash locks on Lawl

Nash 2
Panda 2
Lawl 3 (lynched)

Right? Can't check rn

 

[Tatsumaki]

Funny how I put all three players in the chopping block in my reds yet now I'm unsure of voting any of them.
Pan and those sudden successive votes I don't like
kako why would a mafia move away from the D1 easy town lynch ?
pom who hinted a strong role so now I'm scared of losing a good townie (or did I dream ?)

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 10:10 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 9:44 PM ---

Votekill kakoha

 

[Degojaru]

Hey I'm sorry but I'll not be there at EoD so gonna lock my vote now Votelock Kakoha

 

[Copy Panda]

Why are you singling Sam's vote and ignoring Kakoha's?

Im mostly looking at his overall behaviour, not just the vote. I've been weighing how much of this is caused by his meds vs bad town play. For me the real tipping point towards mafia chutzpah are the votes cast on me past Lawl's death. Could they really tunnel on me that much as town?

Im about to look into Pom vs Kako, I haven't read that much of the latter yet

 

[Lady pompom]

?
can you link them if you're not lying ?



please link said questions, don't just talk

Stop being lazy and go read my posts, it’s ez you go out of thread, see my name and how many posts amd read, I’m too busy to be giving you mafia summaries

Gosh

 

[Copy Panda]

I am mainly following the only real lead we have, Lawl got lynched, as i wanted to do since the beginning. You and Nash were obvious suspects from my pov, as you voted for it, Sam is the person outside of us three voters that i feel like contributed the most at forcing the decisive vote that happened to land on the Townie, plus he pointed me early today and when i replied he got back at me fairly aggressively even accusing me of things he did as well like lyching an active claimer (when people yesterday even had some suspicion about the unusually high amount of active claimers so i really didn't get where he was going there).

About Kako, Hardy and i would even add Pom here, i saw a lot of discourse with next to zero concrete leads that i would find substantial enough to mount a lynch, at least not over our only actual lead and my initial idea. I gave my opinion on if they felt green or not because they discussed a lot and wanted to put out my impressions, not really because i wanted to follow that lead specifically in todays lynch, although i admit i considered it while talking with Hardy since even Sam happened to align with him quite a bit so it raised my eyebrow.

The less active ones would basically be fodder picks, like yeah, i could speculate on if they feel sus or not but i would be discussing over very little, and even with a hit i feel like i would solve fairly little.

Oh sorry Vali I never saw this response. How have your feelings about Sam and Nat concretely developed then? You're for example not convinced by Nashy's posts? Or, like I am, taken aback by Sams inconsistent posting?

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 10:42 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 10:39 PM ---

Stop being lazy and go read my posts, it’s ez you go out of thread, see my name and how many posts amd read, I’m too busy to be giving you mafia summaries

Gosh

Yo Pomcha, why the rush to vote me then? You seem entirely convinced Kako is red, yet 10 posts after voting for him, you let go of that conviction to follow a vote on me? Seems a bit wishy-washy and rushed, too.

 

[Hardy]

Yeyeye you are going down kakoha you mafia bum

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 10:45 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 10:43 PM ---

Im mostly looking at his overall behaviour, not just the vote. I've been weighing how much of this is caused by his meds vs bad town play. For me the real tipping point towards mafia chutzpah are the votes cast on me past Lawl's death. Could they really tunnel on me that much as town?

Im about to look into Pom vs Kako, I haven't read that much of the latter yet

That question was to Vali x but ok

 

[Lady pompom]

Oh sorry Vali I never saw this response. How have your feelings about Sam and Nat concretely developed then? You're for example not convinced by Nashy's posts? Or, like I am, taken aback by Sams inconsistent posting?

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 10:42 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 10:39 PM ---

Yo Pomcha, why the rush to vote me then? You seem entirely convinced Kako is red, yet 10 posts after voting for him, you let go of that conviction to follow a vote on me? Seems a bit wishy-washy and rushed, too.

Because I find your posts rather avoidant (from D1) and I thought I won’t be here for endphase, but yeah should have saved my vote for kako and worked on your case later

 

[Kakoha]

kako why would a mafia move away from the D1 easy town lynch ?

I didn't
I was thinking and saying I would change since half the day, I just didn't know who to change it to yet
and hardy is making it seem like it took much time between panda's vote on lawl and my vote change, but it was 1min apart, I didn't know panda changed when I changed

 

[Marmalade]

You have friends?

 

[Kakoha]

Stop being lazy and go read my posts, it’s ez you go out of thread, see my name and how many posts amd read, I’m too busy to be giving you mafia summaries

Gosh

they don't exist tho, because whenever I get pinged, I reply, there's literally no ping that I have not replied to.
you're just lying, I'm busy too, I'm not gonna search for something that doesn't exist

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 10:56 PM, Original Post Date: Yesterday at 10:55 PM ---

Yeyeye you are going down kakoha you mafia bum

you're gonna feel so stupid after the game

 

[Vali x lucifer]

This game is such a bitc*, i think I finally found my lead but the more i keep mulling over it the more everything feels wrong. I don't want to change my game plan too much but I want to give Panda another day at least, at the cost of throwing the game like an idiot tunnel visioning on Nat

Votelock Natasha

I'll check back tomorrow because I think I am going to do more harm than good running against the timer at 2 am

 

[Tatsumaki]

@Lady pompom this is the second day you "quickly" votelock, is there any reason to those ? or does it just happen like so ?

 

[Copy Panda]

Yeah, tbh I chickened out after re/reading posts. So far I feel if he is mafia, Lawl and hardy are a pair like Santa and elf. But the votes piling gets me with that inkling it might be wrong. The fact that hardy defended him is to be recorded for future interactions (he had a fair point, though)

--- Double Post Merged, Wednesday at 10:15 AM ---

Vote to save yourself if nobody changes from you I guess, my vote is locked, but plenty people disagree with lawl lynch

Because I find your posts rather avoidant (from D1) and I thought I won’t be here for endphase, but yeah should have saved my vote for kako and worked on your case later

So earlier you chickened out; now you rushed your vote and wish you held it for Kako? Sort of irresponsible use of their vote by a vet who's already made a mistake rushing; also a bit inconsistent.

Also, you say you're convinced by Kako's mafianess, yet you find me avoidant, which in itself is cause for more worry than someone you're convinced by? I feel like your decision-making in this regard is rather intransparent in a sense. In both cases, there was plenty of day left, and no reason to rush. If you were uncommitted to killing me to begin with, why even change? No matter the outcome of this day, you'll have left your vote midday and unable to really be held responsible for a given outcome

--- Double Post Merged, Yesterday at 11:09 PM ---

This game is such a bitc*, i think I finally found my lead but the more i keep mulling over it the more everything feels wrong. I don't want to change my game plan too much but I want to give Panda another day at least, at the cost of throwing the game like an idiot tunnel visioning on Nat

Votelock Natasha

I'll check back tomorrow because I think I am going to do more harm than good running against the timer at 2 am

Why Nat

 

[Tatsumaki]

No matter the outcome of this day, you'll have left your vote midday and unable to really be held responsible for a given outcome

If the outcome is your death, she can be reasonably held responsible no ?