Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - END GAME

[Copy Panda]

Kakoha is very likely red, yes. I should have saved my vote to snipe him in case nobody else want to. Istill think panda might be another red, but I will go to sleep and have little time to help in end dp tomorrow.

Kakoha has been pushing his agenda a bit too shamelessly I’d say. Trying to sus me and hardy, not properly answering the questions, then flipping and wording himself as if we haven’t answered his questions. At this point, he def has some hidden agenda.

I'm gonna read his posts carefully now, but tbh it feels like he's just engaging in townie talk? I'm not sure it's an agenda he's pushing. The core of his argument is that he finds Hardy sus because he thinks Hardy was pretty much convinced by Lawls' greenness, and this omniscient attitude he finds incompatible with town Hardy. Hardy then argues he was largely ambivalent and didn't realise there was little time left. It's possible they're both town, just misrepresenting each other.

Yet despite all this, agenda-pushing, sussing you, not properly answering questions, flipping wording, and having a hidden agenda, you decided to vote for me and join a train rather than stick to that conviction. That's not very green

 

[Tatsumaki]

Vali you said you wanted to give Panda more time and don't believe kako is red. But what about Pom, do you trust her ? Or maybe you just distrust Nat more ?

 

[Copy Panda]

If the outcome is your death, she can be reasonably held responsible no ?

Definitely, if I were to die here based on that reasoning, I don't see how that is anything but red.

Rather, if we settle on someone else who also happens to be a green, because of her shaky reasoning, she can always be like, "Well, I voted Panda, not X. Not my fault. You're sus for voting X. Kill Panda, then you"

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:17 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:16 PM ---

Sam and Pom are both parroting this avoidant Panda line and voting in accordance with it; did they rehearse this in the Mafia Pad beforehand

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:18 PM ---

@Tatsumaki what do you think about Hardy vs Kako, I'm about to check Kakos posts (which Ive been stalling on bc theres many with context) but do you think there's a mafia between those two? Is it possible they're just misrepresenting each other, but both greens. I feel like both of them keep pointing to time-related circumstances to justify their decisions, rather than an actual argument

 

[SirSamuel016]

Sam and Pom are both parroting this avoidant Panda line and voting in accordance with it; did they rehearse this in the Mafia Pad beforehand

I was calling you out day 1 buddy so this is some weird shading

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:20 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:19 PM ---

Aight lemme get to my laptop and backread again

 

[Tatsumaki]

Sam left to cool down and never came back

 

[Copy Panda]

I was calling you out day 1 buddy so this is some weird shading

Yeah for silly reasons. Please respond to what you called the temu James wall instead of just spamming "Panda avoidant!!" again bud

 

[Tatsumaki]

Nvm I summoned him

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:21 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:20 PM ---

Next I'd like to summon Nat

 

[SirSamuel016]

Sam left to cool down and never came back

You bum its called sleeping

 

[Kakoha]

I agree with most panda posts ngl
some ppl will throw shade at me for this but idc, I'm already in shade as is xD

 

[Copy Panda]

I wouldn’t say nobody defended lawl, but piling votes are generally something to raise your brow at unless it’s a confirmed mafia.

 

[Kakoha]

right after changing the from lawl to me btw Xp

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:27 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:27 PM ---

the vote**

 

[Tatsumaki]

@Tatsumaki what do you think about Hardy vs Kako, I'm about to check Kakos posts (which Ive been stalling on bc theres many with context) but do you think there's a mafia between those two? Is it possible they're just misrepresenting each other, but both greens. I feel like both of them keep pointing to time-related circumstances to justify their decisions, rather than an actual argument

Huh to be honest at some point it was going so much in circle that I skipped some posts.
It wouldn't be the first time two townies flood the thread because they can't get to understand each other.
Between the two I'd lean more on mafkako. But I don't remember playing with a mafhardy so I'm lacking in reference.

 

[Kakoha]

Next I'd like to summon Nat

ping her
@Natasha

 

[Natasha]

I'm catching up had to prioritise uni

 

[Kakoha]

see ? pinging works

 

[Tatsumaki]

I didn't ping Sam yet he appeared

 

[Copy Panda]

I don’t even know why you and sone others are so intent on lynching me, I actually changed votes because I realize lawl is getting too much voting support against him, which seemed like an easy D1 for mafia, then you guys go and lynch him anyway after chastising me for changing my vote…

Backreading, I just keep finding tidbits in Pomcha's posting that seem a bit inconsistent. Here again she repeats the idea of justifying her vote change because there's too much vote support against X (here: Lawl), while she's generally fine being the fourth vote (a locked one) on me

 

[SirSamuel016]

Yeah for silly reasons. Please respond to what you called the temu James wall instead of just spamming "Panda avoidant!!" again bud

I mean I did respond to parts of it before but sure let me get back there

 

[Tatsumaki]

I'm gonna miss end of day it sucks.
I don't think I'll change my vote as things are

 

[Marmalade]

My ankle is giving up on me but I made it back.

Pan, is your whole suspicion on me just based on the fact that for once I wasn't busy when the game started ? (It has happened before btw)

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 6:31 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 5:58 PM ---

So a few things
When backreading the whole convo it felt like every discussions was going in circles, nothing new nor interesting was said.
I see the lack of kill as a recruitment honestly and I don't understand why that option was practically not discussed.
I don't like the way 3 people quickly piled on Pan after Lawl's post.

For my players categorization
Townish : SirSamuel016 / Natasha / Hardy
Neutralish : Degojaru / Vali x lucifer
Mafish then :Marmalade / Kakoha / Copy Panda / Lady pompom

What makes you trust (or distrust) players over other players? Is it something they said specifically or is it more based on impressions so far?