After rereading a bunch, my current view is that Kako's reasoning on Pomcha seems pretty consistent with my own; she keeps contradicting herself and placing sketchy votes. I suppose my main issue with him vs Hardy is that he misrepresents the degree to which he feels Hardy was defending Lawl. He does sort of concede it felt more; I guess it feels believable to me.
The thing is, I believe Hardy too; I'm more inclined to sus Nashy, who gave a poor reason to sus Hardy and simultaneously defends Pomcha. I haven't read many of her posts, I mostly got the impression she was arguing with Sam. There's something about the tone that's slightly different from usual (maybe less cute than usual somehow? the tone not the person

).
I think I'd rather lynch Pomcha first, I could maybe even come over the bridge that Sams piss poor line of reasoning against me is his meds doing him worse than that time QP fed him 3 gallons of coke and stuck a menthol in his ass. That is, rather than a mafia agenda, just turbo tunnel. He just woke up again after only ~5h of sleep. Hold your hats