Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - END GAME

[Degojaru]

I trust more Marm than Nash for past days so if I had to lynch someone, Nash would be my today objetive

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 1:41 AM, Original Post Date: Saturday at 1:41 AM ---

So you claimed passive to avoid any attention?

You get it

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 1:41 AM ---

D1 we got a lot of active claimers

 

[Hardy]

I don't have a passive role, got townie detective so that's why I was so low talkative, was trying to not catching attention so I can get results from my role. Got D1 Marm townie & D2 Nash mafia, but I dunno my sanity

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 1:39 AM, Original Post Date: Saturday at 1:37 AM ---

Hm explain your targets

 

[SirSamuel016]

Thinking Dego-Vali-Nash/Tatsu...

Panda has that one bad post but it could be just uh lack of tact... maybe

Pan/Nash/Tatsu works?

 

[Hardy]

Pan/Nash/Tatsu works?

Tatsu voted Nash d1 tho

 

[Degojaru]

Hm explain your targets

Mb it was D1 Nash guilty and D2 Marm townie, Marm was just because I needed to choose one player that I see greener than others, while Nash was a mix between my past games and her attitude since D1

 

[Copy Panda]

oh to be lost in the hamburg underground at 3am

 

[Hardy]

Mb it was D1 Nash guilty and D2 Marm townie, Marm was just because I needed to choose one player that I see greener than others, while Nash was a mix between my past games and her attitude since D1

Despite the guilty result Nash was your second most trusted halfway through d2?

 

[Copy Panda]

tbh marms cant be red, even if a red was fine with either pom or me dying, no red would place a last minute vote on either of us. it would make more sense to skip that vote rather place a vote in the last 30 seconds.

re kakos result; maybe panda innocent? he did believe me throughout the day or pom guilty? since he was beefing with her

 

[Degojaru]

Despite the guilty result Nash was your second most trusted halfway through d2?

Agreed with her on some things she posted in wall texts but I didn't confirmed her as 100% townie, first I thought she was town & Sam maf but now it flipped

 

[Hardy]

Agreed with her on some things she posted in wall texts but I didn't confirmed her as 100% townie, first I thought she was town & Sam maf but now it flipped

But if you thought she was town why did you then target another person you thought was town n2?

 

[Copy Panda]

before i ger accusations again, im currently busy again, so gonna be asking questions and updates and shit while im on the move

tatsu claims avenger, dego claims det i glean?

 

[Hardy]

before i ger accusations again, im currently busy again, so gonna be asking questions and updates and shit while im on the move

tatsu claims avenger, dego claims det i glean?

ye

 

[Degojaru]

But if you thought she was town why did you then target another person you thought was town n2?

Because I didn't expected to get guilty from her, also I targeted a player that have more chances to be townie to nearly confirm my sanity

 

[SirSamuel016]

Tatsu voted Nash d1 tho

o shit ur right

you believe the avenger claim?

 

[Hardy]

Because I didn't expected to get guilty from her, also I targeted a player that have more chances to be townie to nearly confirm my sanity

I'm not following the logic
N1: target Nash because of last game, guilty.
D2: still, trust Nash (and Marm).
N2: target Marm despite the fact that you believe she's in the same team as Nash?

In your shoes doesn't it make sense to investigate someone that you thought was in a different team compared to Nash, so you'd get different results?

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 2:02 AM, Original Post Date: Saturday at 2:01 AM ---

o shit ur right

you believe the avenger claim?

Iunno why she didn't explain further

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 2:03 AM ---

I'm not following the logic
N1: target Nash because of last game, guilty.
D2: still, trust Nash (and Marm).
N2: target Marm despite the fact that you believe she's in the same team as Nash?

In your shoes doesn't it make sense to investigate someone that you thought was in a different team compared to Nash, so you'd get different results?

@SirSamuel016 am I missing something?

 

[Degojaru]

I'm not following the logic
N1: target Nash because of last game, guilty.
D2: still, trust Nash (and Marm).
N2: target Marm despite the fact that you believe she's in the same team as Nash?

In your shoes doesn't it make sense to investigate someone that you thought was in a different team compared to Nash, so you'd get different results?

I didn't thought Marm & Nash could be together plus after D1 result my first thought was that I'm insane det

 

[Hardy]

I didn't thought Marm & Nash could be together plus after D1 result my first thought was that I'm insane det

I'm saying together as townies in this scenario

 

[Degojaru]

Oh I forgot to mention that I wanted to investigate Pom but got Marm result before I can switch so nvm, I chosen Marm without reading yesterday posts and didn't wanna forget to use my role, after reading all I was close to switch but after I got the result, I can't change my objetive

--- Double Post Merged, Saturday at 2:12 AM, Original Post Date: Saturday at 2:10 AM ---

I thought that if Marm gets a guilty result, then I'm insane det

 

[SirSamuel016]

I'm not following the logic
N1: target Nash because of last game, guilty.
D2: still, trust Nash (and Marm).
N2: target Marm despite the fact that you believe she's in the same team as Nash?

In your shoes doesn't it make sense to investigate someone that you thought was in a different team compared to Nash, so you'd get different results?

@SirSamuel016 am I missing something?

Errrrrr I don't get still trusting Marm D2 given she was a crucial vote in getting Kako lynched if anything but I don't mind the target based on that lynch. The reasoning is a bit off but the targeting sorta makes sense?

 

[Hardy]

Errrrrr I don't get still trusting Marm D2 given she was a crucial vote in getting Kako lynched if anything but I don't mind the target based on that lynch. The reasoning is a bit off but the targeting sorta makes sense?

But he's saying he went for 2 players he trusted and that he trusted Nash D2 despite the guilty in N1. I'm not understanding.