I have to agree with LB56...
Just a little history....the Olympic tradition was derived from the ancient Greeks. The Olympic games has always been about competing. One of the most valued of the Greek cultural tradition is what they called, "arete" -- loosely translated, it means, "virtue" (
See here), or "personal excellence" (
also see here).
It involves proving who is better, or tougher, not just physically (as kaliayev alluded to when he mentioned the word "athleticism"), but also mentally.
I've studied a lot of eastern philosophy, and so I can tell you in great detail, although I won't do so here, that mental toughness depends a lot on physical toughness, as well. They are interconnected. Your mind cannot function as effectively if your physical body is not in the best of shape, and vice versa.
So, shooting might on the surface, seem just all about being mentally tough, because your shooting stationary.
But in order to be a good shooter to begin with, requires practice, and that part is physical.
It's not as if you study to become a shooter, as we study for chemistry exams. To acquire the skill, I bet, requires some sort of physical training.
We can go through a list of so many sports that are fundamentally violent, i.e. boxing, wrestling. But when done in the spirit of a "friendly competition", you take away much of the unwanted violent aspect, and it becomes simply a matter of who is physically, and mentally tougher, to prove one's "arete".
The same is true with shooting, and so I think it's fair to say, that it suitably qualifies as an Olympic sport.
And besides, the ancient Greeks were violent people, to begin with, so I'm sure they would have been excellent gun toting assassins.
In other news.....Usain Bolt! man, this guy is a beast!
He's being mentioned in the same category as legendary greats, such as Jesse Owens and Carl Lewis, and deservingly so. He's like the Michael Phelps equivalent of track and field.