- Joined
- Feb 11, 2011
- Messages
- 7,377
- Reaction score
- 8,557
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
I think it's just the strength of Haki.Am I to believe that Luffy was not using Haki against Saturn (hence his regeneration) ? It seems Haki negates the regeneration, but I am getting annoyed by how inconsistent Oda is
The weaker Haki is, the less effective it is. We saw how Vergo's Haki was not strong enough against Law's DF, but Joker's was. We saw how Kaido and Big Mom's Haki was strong enough to resist being teleported by Law.
As boring as it is or sounds, it's probably just Gaban's Haki is just strong enough to be that effective against immortality. Literally, if we look at the chronology of Haki, it's literally:
- Haki is harder the stronger it becomes.
- Haki is more effective against Hax the stronger it becomes.
Also, I hope people don't think just because Sommer may no longer be immortal against Gaban means it's an autowin.
Every character in the series is not mortal, and the fights are still difficult. Even if Sommers can no longer take deathly blows assuming the damage is permanent, he's still a competent fighter who should be able to tough out major injuries like every other powerful mortal character, and should be able to avoid attacks when needed.
I don't think this should be an easy win for Gaban, but at this point, I just want to see Luffy.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I think this is misplacing common sense for story sense.pretty sure haki wasn't used in the first chapter lol. Plenty of manga have characters giving of killing intent to scare off opponents - this is what it was.
1. If haki was available to Shanks he coulda easily used haki from afar
2. That would have created the same effect of scaring away the beast and saving Luffy. As opposed to having to swim to Luffy, give Luffy a hug while losing his arm, and then use haki to scare away the beast.
Shanks wouldn't lose an arm if he wasn't as stupid.
A story pretty much relies on incompetence for plot to go forward or be interesting.
That was King's Haki, the seaking got intimidated when Shanks let it off.
Should Shanks lose an arm? No, but for the story to be interesting, stupid things like this need to happen. Oda said in one of his SBS or magazines that his editor encouraged him to make Shanks lose an arm to make the story more interesting.
If there's no incompetence, stupidity, or carelessness, this story would have ended years ago. The reason arcs go the way they do is because Luffy doesn't follow rules, or plans, or think things through, this is why Oda can create all the chaotic developments that occur in the story.
No doubt Shanks could have seen the future, stopped everything from happening before it even happened, but that's simply not interesting, that's just boring plot development. It gives the reader little to look forward to.
It was available, it's just this is more dramatic and interesting from a story-telling perspective. Without any of this, Luffy wouldn't have a scar on his eye, Shanks won't have 1 arm.... this incompetence and negligence from what should be competent characters is needed for an interesting story.1. If haki was available to Shanks he coulda easily used haki from afar
2. That would have created the same effect of scaring away the beast and saving Luffy. As opposed to having to swim to Luffy, give Luffy a hug while losing his arm, and then use haki to scare away the beast.