Done PLZ help me with a sentence

mythhuman

Registered User
初心者/ Shoshinsha / Beginner
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Age
38
Gender
Male
Country
American Samoa
Holy land(by molokidan) chapter 118 ,page16 of the chapter(or 166 of the volume)
why did the translator used sentence "FIght with me once more" than "Fight me once more"
Really puzzle,thanks for anwsering...
 

Sohma Riku

Intl Translator
下級員 / Kakyuuin / Jr. Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
51
Reaction score
36
Age
36
Gender
Female
Country
Netherlands
If you ask me "Fight with me once more" and "Fight me once more" have excactly the same meaning, but a different grammatical contruction. As far as I know neither of them is wrong. If you really want to know why the translator decided to translate a certains sentence in a certain way, you'll have that person him/herself.
 

mikkih

Translator/Moderator
英雄メンバー / Eiyuu Menbaa / Hero Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
1,710
Reaction score
1,371
Gender
Female
Country
United States
I'm not sure if there is anything to do with it, but fight with me takes up more space than fight me. The best way to find out is to contact molo. (He is such an excellent translator, by the way.) You could PM him or make a post in his thread: here is the Link
 

mythhuman

Registered User
初心者/ Shoshinsha / Beginner
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Age
38
Gender
Male
Country
American Samoa
thank you guys for help.And molo's replied me.So nice
 

Aarowaim

Registered User
下級員 / Kakyuuin / Jr. Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
91
Reaction score
53
Gender
Male
Country
Canada
僕と戦いでください translates literally into 'fight with me'. と in contexts like this one usually means 'with'. A translator who is not skilled in English, or who translates very literally will ignore the opportunity to simplify the sentence by removing the 'with'. Because 'to fight (someone)' already implies participation, 'with' is redundant. Two main possibilities arise; shortening the translation did not occur to the translator, or, as mikkih suggests, there was a good reason for the translation. 'with' also tends to imply co-operation (fight beside me once more), so if the character is talking to a friend, this is the reason.

All considered, the translator might not have thought of removing 'with', or if they did, they had reason to preserve the 'with'. Either way, the question ultimately falls upon the original translator's thinking process.

Hopefully molo helped you out :)
 
Top