- Joined
- Jul 7, 2009
- Messages
- 4,190
- Reaction score
- 2,208
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
err yes i know that the church used to distinuish races on basis of the 3 childred of Noah and the curse of Caanan its there in GenesisOkay, time for a little history. We would read that statement today and think it is racist (and in turn against God), but it was actually very acceptable and in fact supported by the Church in the 1800's. The earliest "hypothesis" of race was that there were three different races, European, Oriental and African, and each race was descended from a son of Noah.
but i am not adherent to Church or Bible so that Hypothesis doesnt work for me, one of the Muazzin(one who calls for prayer, second most imp person after then Imam ie leader) in the time of the Prophet (saw) was a black, that kind of distiction with three child of Noah is not there in my faith so i quoted it as a reference, but i agree i needed to be a bit more candid abt my post. I generalized it a bit too much
My point is there is no meaning to it if you look at it that way, i am not saying Atheist cant be moral or i am not saying they are not moral i am saying there is no reason for them to be MoralThe idea of modern atheism is to look at the scriptures, look at the history and be decide that believing in god is not worth it and/or most certainly absurd. I would argue it's more ethical because modern atheists are continually challenged on their views, versus people who hide in religion when they are the most godless people on Earth. You see, modern atheists are intent on proving that they are more ethical than the church, so they do so by arranging charities.
never said that its Darwins invention i just said that in order to establish a social norm different kind of theories are put into practice one of them is social darwinismSocial Darwinism was not a Darwin invention.
Last edited:

) among other things.
)

Leave it to the media to show religion(any kind of) in a bad light. :/