- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,698
- Reaction score
- 797
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
The opposite of mainstream does not imply good. This is one fatal flaw that keeps HXH always somewhat on the fringe as opposed to mainstream (though it sure sells a lot).I dont care that Ponzu is popular or not, if togashi wanted her dead for the sake of the history development then she must die.
This popular characters invulnerabity is what killed all the fun of the other shonen, like naruto for an example.
People die, thats what makes the world what it is, no matter if they are popular or not.
We're not talking about One Piece where half of the Straw Hats have absolutely no business participating in fights and yet still miraculously survive every time. The girls of the Straw Hats should've died about 100 times by now if it was written by Togashi because they simply do not belong in the battlefield whatsoever.
In the Ponz situation anybody could've died in her place. There's no shortage of existing characters and it's not like Togashi has a problem with adding new characters. There's no particular importance to why she died. She might be cute and a fan favorite but it's not like she has any impact to the story whatsoever. Kite getting killed was meaningful to the story (and ironically he came back from the dead anyway almost One Piece style, which makes his sacrifice pointless) so while a lot of people hated it too, it was probably necessary for the story. Ponz? It added absolutely nothing and seems to exist merely to annoy the fans.
People are willing to put up with most of Togashi's problems as a human being because HXH is pretty darn good, but there's a limit to the amount of abuse people can put up for good manga. You look at a scene like Kite dying, who actually had a legitmate reason to die, and then he miraculously returned to life. Is it due to fan pressure or just a lapse in judgment? Who knows, but Kite who really did have a good reason to die somehow did not die, why should similarly popular characters get horribly killed when they don't even have a good reason to die in the first place?
The Spiders should've lost about 3 guys while fighting Zanza. Only Phinx won his fight very comfortably, and quite a few of them got bailed out because their opponent was stupid. It'd be consistent with the idea that in HXH fights can go either way and even a minor mistake/matchup issue can get you killed. But what does killing 3 Spiders against Zanza achieve besides angering the significant Spider supporters for no reason whatsoever? If 3 of the Spiders died against Zanza, would the Ant arc be a better story? No, so it didn't happen, but it could have, showing Togashi isn't impartial. I find all this talk about HXH being unorthodox is very hypocritical. Togashi doesn't touch the Spiders or the main characters despite this reputation of 'no mercy'. Gon still got an author bailout after using a power that should either kill him or leave him as a vegetable for the rest of his life. No Togashi only axes the fringe popular characters, i.e. characters people like but probably won't quit over if they died. When the Zodiac appeared a lot of people thought the Rabbit girl was going to die horribly in Pariston's hands due to HXH's history, and again there's no particular reason why she should've died (she's not a particularly important member of the Zodiac), but most people guessed she'd die just because she was cute. That turned out to be wrong but it's reflective of people's expectation of HXH.
Last edited:
