- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- Messages
- 360
- Reaction score
- 7
- Age
- 35
- Gender
- Hidden
- Country
-
^^ agreeing wif u, messi played awesome for barca, coming of the bench and winning it for them, simply awesome.
Almost everone with brains in my country can see that (about 35% of the population)...the rest are completely biased and want Riqueme to run the team just like he does with Boca....guess what, Riquelme: the international refs aren't gonna "take care" of you like the argentinian refs do! I'm shocked that some people still consider that turtle as Argentina's star....they need to know there's a little shy guy called Messi who can maybe do a bit better than this cold-hearted bastard who is currently killing any chance we have of a fast and effective gameplay![]()
Lucho? Milito (the bad one)? BANEGA?Argentina sure is finding trouble replacing some spots. I dont think the problem is the attack, as Aguero and Milito are on top form, but I agree Riquelme should be replaced. In Portugal, I havent seen enough of Aimar to say he's back at the great old times, but Lucho Gonzalez is magic. He runs Porto's game with superb class. Our best player and goes better every season. Still, I was told he's not convincing when playing for Argentina. Aside from the problem finding an attacking midfielder, Argentina has top class defensive midfielders like Cambiasso, Banega, Gago or Mascherano. I wonder if Messi could play as a true number 10 in a classic 4-4-2:
Defense Mid: Banega
Right Mid: Lucho
Left Mid: Cambiasso
10: Messi
strikers: Aguero Milito
Something like this...
Messi likes to organize the play and to break trough the center with 1-2 combinations with the strikers, so I think it'd be worth a try
I totally agree. Riquelme would be the perfect player for Italy. He's a similar type of player as Veron imo. Veron's best years were when he played in Italy and perhaps Riquelme could have given it a try if he werent in Boca like fish in water. But for Argentina's current NT, Riquelme is way off the offset.
I doubt it is Arsenal. His agent is quoted as saying "It’s going to be a very big transfer. Zenit can afford not to sell him cheaply.” Wenger wanted to sign him, but bulked at how much they wanted (i heard sp*rs offered 20 milllion but it was still refused) which pretty much sums it up. Its either chelsea or liverpool. Ferguson already spent a lot of money and i doubt he will spend more to have someone on the bench. Chelsea are in desperate need of a striker/strike partner. Anelka is mis-firing on all cylinders, drogba is injured (again!) and is on the wrong side of 30, and the only other option is young di santo who has never scored in a competitive match for chelsea. While liverpool have decent amount of striking option, but benitez might try to bolster it.I read today that Arshavin's manager is asking the president of Zenit to discuss a transfer to the Premier League, the only club to CURRENTLY have shown interest is Arsenal. Zenit won't let him go for less than 30, but I'm glad. It's going to be really good for his career, and he's a very charismatic player that I believe can help out certain teams in England enough.
For example I was recently discussing how well he would fit into Liverpool with a friend, and how I hope Chelsea doesn't go near him. As for M.U. .. they already have all the offensive spots filled, and he doesn't deserve to be benched, especially the way he's been performing lately.
So anyway, here's to hoping we see him in a team like Liverpool/Arsenal in January. It would at least (for me) make either of those teams a little more interesting.
You mean the barca-atleti match? I wanted to watch it but i couldnt in the end. After i heard the result i was so pissed off, i had to settle for highlightsHahah, holy shit Real was crazy tonight.
I really feel sorry for my fav player but still.. that real was insane. Too bad they don't play like this every night.
. But real is playing them next week so i might catch that one. Btw, is it me or does it seem like every match real plays next its the one that barca has just played...suspicious 
I actually see nasri as a good replacement for hleb. He has already scored two in about 6 appearences, while it usually took hleb a whole season to reach only 3. And he offers more pace, so he can take on the fullbacks and get behind them instead of only cutting in. But i agree with flamini. He left a huge hole to fill, Denilson is not a holding midfielder...he is too...creative. Already he is one of the top assitors in the league, but we really dont need that (that Cesc's job >.>). And it means were more vulnerable at the back, which then brings about the theory that we need a 7ft centre back...what we need is a center back and and a centre midfielder like diego from werder bremen or someone experience who can come in and do the job straight away...
we lost two of our best players this season(flamini and hleb) and we aint replaced them... so that's our priority i think, not another striker...

Your right, the economic climate is definitely not helping our football. Less money for people to spend means lower attendances. The attendances are already dropping at some clubs, like the Sunderland - arsenal match at the stadium of light only got about 40,000 when the same time last season is was 47,000. Although it is affecting the lower leagues more.Well, the football world is funded by investors, who no doubt had stocks in the Dow/Nasdaq..
Also M.U. is owned by an American Bank (Ronaldo sale) and England's economy is more closely tied to Wall Street, than Italy's. But who knows?
Honestly I was just saying Milan has a chance because Arsenal has a history of selling off it's star players since they are expendable (due to the bench being as good as the starters) and I dunno.. Milan could use the boost in morale since they aren't in the Ch. League this year. Still I think they should aim for a goalkeeper more so than a midfielder.
England's playing in a couple of hours and it would be interesting to see what the line-up is. Gerrard is fit so the debate on whether or not he can play with lampard could be settled, today. Anyway ING-GUUR-LAAAND!!
Perhaps. I didnt quite understand the replacements he made, as we played without center forward starting on the 1st substitution at 60'. Danny is a player that had some impact on Sporting CP some years ago. That impact was enough for him to get transfered but not enough for Portugal's NT. Then he disappeared completely and only this past season he appeared and he did it with a bang, starting to unleash magic on the pitch and transfering for those huge 30M€ for Zenit. Its still unknown if his irregular side will appear and he stops playing like he is, but right now, he should be a 1st team regular or at least a joker in the bench... Its a shame Queiroz was satisfied with the drawYea I was about to post about the Brazil game also. It looks like Argentina and Brazil are back on the right road, but Brazil was very impressive with Kaka, Adriano, Robinho. Maybe it is best they not use Pato and Ronaldhino, with this experienced and steady team they are more consistent than using just young players or depending on Ronaldhino as captain who at the moment, can't really do what Brazil needs.
Is there a reason Danny only played 4 minutes by the way? Does Queiroz not trust him?
I think you're exaggerating. I hope you arent! :PI don't like to make exaggerations but he could very well do what Zidane did for France, for Portugal.