- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 797
- Reaction score
- 132
- Age
- 39
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
And considering it was a a bottom ranker as recently as a few weeks ago, doing well enough to get up there under any condition is impressive.
Where can I find the other pics with the other mangaka?Interesting comparison, Koen! I wouldn't put it past Ohba, it certainly wouldn't be the first time he seems to allude to something that is going on in real-life WSJ.Only thing is, I hope that doesn't actually mean Shimabukuro wants to end Toriko in less than 20 weeks
Here is the picture in question, for those interested!
![]()


AoEx, since the announcement of the anime, went from a barely 80k series to a 150k series, and after the anime started airing the sales have skyrocketed into 350-400k territory and it's still going. In comparison, Toriko's previous volumes have not picked up in sales at all, it doesn't even show up in the top 50 manga ranking where the threshold for entry is 11-13k on most weeks. In addition, the ratings continue to dip, and for the slot it's in, getting 6-7% a week is not good enough, and last week it even dipped to 5.5%. So, what I'm worried is that not only is Toriko not the smash hit that Shueisha tried to make it into, the anime may be cancelled at 50 eps if the ratings don't pick up.Rank/Week's Sales/Total Sales/Title
11, *43,797 *,358,384 Ao no Exorcist vol.6
14, *39,893 *,376,520 Ao no Exorcist vol.5
17, *37,951 *,417,369 Ao no Exorcist vol.1
18, *37,833 *,375,780 Ao no Exorcist vol.4
19, *35,720 *,395,594 Ao no Exorcist vol.2

Actually, AoEx is produced by A-1 Pictures while FMA was produced by Bones. That said, AoEx is aired on the same slot as FMA was (well, its spiritual successor anyway) and both are funded by MBS.I think it's because of the anime quality. AoEx anime has much more quality even though they have fillers, animation is superb as well as characters design and color palette. As you said the anime form AoEx even gives the FMA vibe (it's by the same studio after all) The fillers of AoEx are pretty enjoyable too![]()
they told me it was by the same studio 

.
350,000 copies per volume is a relatively low ceiling, more of a minor hit. That would not be enough to push it to the same level of popularity enjoyed by Bakuman. Volume 6 of AnE is already nearing 350k, Toriko volumes are unlikely to reach 350,000 while they are actively charting. Moving from 280 to 350,000 indicated that book stores want extra copies of the new book on hand, but are not expecting large number of new fans.Mago and Toriko both had very good success even before the anime (Mago at 190K+- and Toriko at the 210K+-), in the meantime Mago didn't get beyond the 280K AFAIK and Toriko will have it's first volume after the anime in the following month, I do presume Toriko will break the 350 by a little but it's more due to the manga being in a very high spot so it might get extra attention by Jump readers and extra sales.
SQ is aimed at an older audience. Weekly Jump is a young teen magazine, aimed at readers between 12-15. Shueisha does not expect a significant percentage of readers to be 16 or older. SQ is aimed at older teens. Shueisha does not expect any readers younger than sixteen. The style of writing reflects audience, with Jump focused on childrens comics, SQ having more mature themes, violence, and nudity.Kaiten, in response to what you said about comparing a WSJ manga/anime to SQ series how big do you believe the difference in content in all terms is?
In some cases SQ is like the same as WSJ with less chapters and better art since it's monthly.
That is due to the age group. 14 and 15 year olds generally are not looking for different. SQ is intended for older readers, so they can take a few more risks.Not that I have read that much SQ mangas but from what I did read it did not have a different "vibe" than some WSJ series although I felt some if being in WSJ wouldn't survive for the fact of them being more unique if so to say and less generic which leads me to making this kind.


I agree with you! I can sit down and see something in FMA/HP and it'll feel extraordinary, but nothing really feels out of the ordinary in AnE.When people say that Ao no Exorcist feels like FMA's successor, or that it has a Harry Potter-ish feel, I don't really get it. In my opinion AnE isn't like FMA at all, and it definitively don't give the HP feel. The biggest different is that you can feel the greatness of the magic world in HP, while the stuff that's happening in AnE feels pretty normal. I can agree to the statement that AnE appeals more to the fantasy-oriented audience though.
I may sound a little negative about AnE now, but I'm not. Actually I really enjoy it
Is it just me that don't see any similarity's between AnE and FMA/HP?
Back to the topic:
Just because Toriko wasn't a instant hit doesn't mean that it will ever be. Look at Toriko 1/2 years from now, and I'll bet it's one of the leading series in WSJ (if it's not already).