Which raises a valid question...why is Komoto making a Harry Potter parody/spoof so far removed from when the series was running? Even ignoring the tainted reception of J.K. Rowling and the franchise, it just seems like a rather dated subject for a gag manga to be built on, regardless of the books fame.
)
There's a difference between doubting information as long as there's no actual confirmation or definite proof and just trusting whatever anyone says on social media taking it immediately as news.
You're from 2011, i don't think you need to worry about it kkkkk, this things will be decided but it's probably more focused on very new accounts with zero posts made.Hey I'm a lurker and I would like to be included in the votes. I always vote for Chainsaw and Samurai 8 because I am only reading "newer" series and those two are my favorites from the mangas I read weekly. I also vote for miitama a lot because it makes me laugh. (Hi everyone
You'd be more than safe. I agree that 6 month old accounts with 100 posts seems like a good enough qualifier.
I think the post number count is enough, honestly. Pretty sure there has to be someone earlier than 6 months that is actually contibuting to the forum.
Most people were doubting him here simply over the fact he messed up on the news for OPM/DBS. I agree not to take everything he says as confirmation/news but he is most of the time correct with his leaks which makes him credible enough.
I don't know. I'm undecided on this. I can perhaps lower the age restriction, since 6 months might be too high. Completely removing it seems too lax, though.
Its fine to be skeptical since he isn't an official source not to mention he has been wrong in the past. Point I was making was that some users were saying he has no sources, he inst reliable etc when that clearly isnt the case considering he's been right more times than wrong, especially in the last few months
My opinion as someone who not even meet the criteria is that the standard sounds good enough
. I should post more but when my opinion tends to align exactly with some users I feel that leaving a like on their post is enough.
Potter is a canonized "classic" now. It's reached a legacy where references to it are pretty timeless. Like an Oz, Star Wars, Wonka etc.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I am only 4 months old in the forum so I wouldn't be able to vote for example. I think 100 posts is a bit too much, maybe 50 is a more reasonable number and I would lessen the number of months to 2 or even get rid of it and only keep the number of posts.
Sounds fair to me, it's not very restrictive and helps in keeping the number of participants in check.
I understand wanting diversity in taste, but no, this is too lenient. I don't think it's too much to ask that you actively participate in the community if you're wanting to participate in the polls.
The poll isn't about the taste of the thread, but the forum, if you're a user of the forum and read Weekly Shonen Jump mangas you should be able to vote for it without having to to be a "regular" of this thread or have to be obligated to make X number of comments just to be considered as "valuable" for the thread, A user that have 51 comments and years of the forum but don't make a single comment anymore is able to vote (which i have 0 problems with) but someone that have under that and actually comment in the thread from time to time is suddenly not considered "worth" to vote, thats my problem, but you do what you do.
I'd say if they're active on the forum outside of the thread that's fine. At least they reflect the userbase of the site
Look at the amount of lurkers sometime.