Well, you see, the difference here is that we have physical, undisputable evidence that Einstein existed. We even have him on video. Aristotle could be argued that he never existed but his existence is supported through many people writing about hom around the time he was alive. Religious beliefs, almost by definition, can't be proven by physical means, and so there is no way (apart from dying) to know who was right and who was wrong..
i beilieve that aristotle existed we have his work but aristotle existed before birth of jesus while aristotle believed that god existed through his theory even though people at some point didnt admit his beliefs because he shows no signs of prophecy he is just another human while prophets carry evidences miracles convincing enough but every religion defys human nature which is" i want to do what i want " ofcourse there will be distortions .
that only proves that the prophets existed .
now if you are convinced with something that is common sense you will just take it as granted and you might transfer it to others who will do the same .
just look at muslims we are humans we have a mind why do we not come with stuff like you guys given there is a billion muslim . you cant defy something thats been approved by a mass majority for 14 century .
because islam is convincing enough its granted unquestionable .
and if there was something we hear of it as there bad guys there are good ones who will try to uncover the truth .
Its true that people tend to not believe things without evidence except when its something they have been raised to believe or when they see how strongly others believe it. That's why religion is considered to almost be part of the human condition.
The intelligence thing can actually be perfectly explained through evolution. Other animals have evolved the ability to use tools and even use complex speech patterns to communicate.
.
if you say there is physical evolution how come we dont physically evolve after all this time . the mind evolves simply because as knowlege enlarges it requires mind to adapt with it and its called learning we dont evolve we learn .
many believers in evoltion mainly sientists admited that its wrong simply because studies shows that the evidence is that some species were found which genuinly matchs the current species .
besides each creature has its specified structure you cant say a bird evolved to a reptile because it doesnt make sense .
Saying that it isn't credible isn't the same thing as saying it's a lie. And I believe in history, but you can't seriously compare one of the holy evangelises in the New Testament and the work of Albert Einstein because there are tons of different factors playing a part of the making.
a human is a human unless you were granted access to a minimum of some upper knowledge and prophets carry that i believe that enstein talked about relegion and science and their integration .
einstein's mind isnt the best now one of you guys could come up with something better .
prophets are on a whole different league because they had revelation from god who created us in all this who knows everything .
to me aristotle or anybody else cant come close to prophets but god granted those people like aristotle a mind to think about and intelligence and you know what they discoverd thanks to their minds ? that god exists .
and their knowledge contributed into our evolution .
Of course, because they don't feel it's necessary to believe something that might be wrong, people want to be right, and without proof, it might be wrong..
my friend the truth or at least a guide wont come to you while you are sitting and drinking alcohol not even awake to use your brain to just search for it you cant say something is wrong and not look for a solution because its math you know an exercise is complicated you cant solve it does that mean it has no answer no it simlpy means you have to make an effort to find it .
but just sitting around saying i dont believe in that end of story because then your pleasing only yourself but instinct pushing to the truth will never rest and there comes the question who created us ?
First and foremost, my friends told me that, and I don't know their definition and living to the fullest doesn't necessarily mean sex and alcohol, basically, living life to the fullest in my opinion is living without caring too much about other peoples opinions and to do what you want, not to think of the consequences all the time..
living to the fullest means to do whatever it takes to find satisfaction aka known happiness it happens that it crosses with our instincts .
and also we are stupid to follow ourselves and not our mind because whatever satisfies you will have a cost either on your time or you health .
No. It's not even close to the same thing. A disrespectful atheist thinks like this "There's no god, and you're a stupid fuck for believing so. You must be stupid thinking that something like that exists lol gtfo".
A respectful atheist thinks like this "I do not believe in a god, but if you do, it's up to you to believe what you want and you might as well be right, what do I know?"
And your arguments are very biased because when discussing if it's disrespectful or not you should look from a neutral perspective because being religious is disrespectful towards atheists, just as Drmke pointed out.
-Blai
atheism is oriented in a one dirrection opposing relegion ( islam) so who should feel offended us or them .
again atheisme brings nothing but the opposite of relief its hard its confusing its bad .
Nailed it.
So you think the earth was created for humans to enjoy? In my opinion we're just another species on this planet who happened to evolve into the most intelligent species (and some even argue against that), and while we are indeed on top of the food chain, we still weren't placed on this earth as the superior species. What you said pretty much just sounds like a reason to justify the terrible way we're treating the earth's animals, forcing hundreds of them extinct ever year. I'm not saying you're trying to justify such a cause, but going around thinking we're the reason Earth was created is likely to point one in that direction. .
treating the earth animals means only one thing evil yes the earth is ours how do you justify nutrition .
god never said to abuse animals its the problem with us we are bad .
Aight, this doesn't even make sense. I'm being disrespectful to you for not believing in something you can't prove? Then you're just as disrespectful to atheists for completely disregarding their thoughts and ideas of life. I'm not being disrespectful to "the almighty", I simply don't believe there is such a higher power, and I don't think I can be dissing something I don't even reckon exists..
atheisem is ungratefull and selfish . you say there is no god meaning i can do whatever i want in this life meaning there is nobody to judge thus if you kill somebody you wont go to hell if you kill thousands of people you think going to prison is enough taking his life is enough no . by doing that you committed a crime you abused someones freedom of life . who gave you the right to do that .
for all the palestinians who is gonna stand up for them no one . innocent people die every they and people get away with it do you think its fair .
you wont revenge on those guys but then again law forbidds you from doing that because you have no proof .
the day we stand before the almighty we become even and then judgement is brought .
I don't mind you believing in some sort of God. Heck, I can't prove I'm right about there not being one, so why should you not be allowed to think that way? However, when you call me disrespectful for not sharing your belief, telling me I'm wrong even though you can't prove otherwise, that's when you become the disrespectful one.
EDIT: Blai kinda beat me to it. I'm a slow typer.
Still stands, though.
i explained that and i told you should just try islam as some people try buddhism once you get into islam you can never walk away simlply because it brings you happiness .
when we talk about relegion doesnt mean that human activities should comlpetly stop because it defies our nature .
[In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
21. Such as fear not the meeting with Us (for Judgment) say: "Why are not the angels sent down to us, or (why) do we not see our Lord?" Indeed they have an arrogant conceit of themselves, and mighty is the insolence of their impiety!
22. The Day they see the angels,- no joy will there be to the sinners that Day: The (angels) will say: "There is a barrier forbidden (to you) altogether!" ]
[ In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
190. Behold! in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of night and day,- there are indeed Signs for men of understanding,-
191. Men who celebrate the praises of Allah, standing, sitting, and lying down on their sides, and contemplate the (wonders of) creation in the heavens and the earth, (With the thought): "Our Lord! not for naught Hast Thou created (all) this! Glory to Thee! Give us salvation from the penalty of the Fire. ]
anybody interested in these words ? what do you guys think about it ?
or could anybody have enough knowledge to to say something like this ?
its the reveletion of god its the holy quran its the only credible book on earth its protected from the hands of humans .
). The brain doesn't live on after we die, so I just don't buy it.
), it starts to "trick" itself into thinking something else is happening. Usually, it makes you think good things but it can always make you see bad things as well (heaven, hell). Of course you can chalk these up to actual spiritual phenomenon, but then you have to consider the people who have near-death experiences who don't see heaven or hell but something different all together. Some people see their family or something else that makes them happy, real or not. Most (and I say most because nothing is certain) are simply cause by the brain panicking.
I'm just quoting a conversation from the manga which is similar to food chain. Human is part of the food chain. I'm more into the scientific explanation than on beliefs but I do still respect/observe different views about life & death.