- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,272
- Reaction score
- 1,354
- Gender
- Male
- Country
-
I don't think we're coming from such a different place, honestly.You're invoking intention, and I agree that in this scenario Yamato isn't the person being offended. They're not real. However, the types of attitudes people display towards the topic itself is what is worrisome and it's what people take exception with. Plus, I don't really agree with the notion that people are behaving the way they are because they're "offended". That's an oversimplification that really only exists to ignore details IMO.
Hate speech can exist without intent, so I don't know what distinction you think you're making.
I don't really agree with the "offended/offensive" part, mostly because that word has been thrown around a lot, and it surely wasn't unintentional.
If a comment's perceived as offensive, people should explain why, and people should also explain why not, if they believe it wasn't. That's when we enter detail, and that's a healthy argument, as far as I'm concerned. When it comes to attitude, I've also said, quite a lot, that I agree that mistakes are made.
I've certainly made a few, and I believe others have done their own.
I might've deviated from the original point over a couple of more direct arguments, but I guess what I've been trying to emphasize is precisely that: nuance is important, and we can only muddle through it by engaging others and elaborating. The distinction I'm trying to make is that, during most of the recent back and forths, there was no such thing as hate speech being thrown around, so I don't understand words like transphobic being thrown around either.
Then we come to particular arguments, and those vary a lot. It's very hard to navigate different points of contention and jumping between them without straw manning someone.
If I may add, (despite not being related to your comment)
I don't understand comments like "transgender people face a lot of hardships, prejudice and violence" being associated with other points made in this thread, and if you take a look around, those type of reasonings are often mentioned. So, those problems will be addressed by conceding on what gender is, despite nothing more than anecdotal evidence substantiating that view? or pronoun usage?
I'm a big advocate of tolerance towards diversity, but even that seems to bother a few people, because using the word tolerance seems to be taking the moral high ground.