Re: Ah.
That'd be Jekyll and Hyde. I think you are too consistent for that. Then again, my friend has already told me that I do not have the eye to tell people's true nature.
Well, boys are weaklings. They are small fly. If you have notable success in bullying girls, though, that's a different story.
Heh? Now, that's something I got curious about. Did you want to stop it or did it just happen to be that way? I have an unquenchable thirst to know how to make or break a person, and making or breaking of a routine defines the very same notion.
Not as extreme as Jekyll and Hyde, but I am known to have many different personas.
I usually don't have any cause to bully girls. Girls and boys alike fear me though. For the girls, they said because I'm just so scary and psychopathic. I often invent new ways to torture and I love to tell them about it.
Well, actually there's one victim who's a female. But it's because she's so easy and fun to bully to the point where
everybody bullies her, even those who are bullied. But even among the bullies, I am considered the top of the food chain. I may not be the one who bullies her the most, but I do it the best. I do it so efficiently too. My favorite method is to use the sharpest and shortest words.
Hmm. I think it's mostly because I didn't have any victim. In my major, most of the students are females and some of them were like me. The males were already so intimidated, they were already submissive. I spent my freshman year mostly in my major building, so I didn't get to see other guys from other majors. By sophomore year, I already grew out of the habit that I no longer got physical and chose to be verbal.
---------- Post added at 02:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:11 AM ----------
So which kind of anti-villain or hero are you?
Why are they reversed? I said anti-hero and villain, not anti-villain and hero.
Guess which.
How did you find images with expressions so similar to your daily expression?
