Mag Talk Weekly Shonen Jump [2019] - Discussion and TOC Talk

[Xzone]

it's not in your hands, he has original pics and he can put a watermark or cut it !

Is a Shueshia's picture if we go with this way of thinking, that dude only take it and post his watermark

 

[TxxT]

I would argue the image isn't even needed with that kind of quality,

I can never understand why people want off angle image with glares

They obv dont care about the image quality, the only thing that matters to those types of leakers are posting the pics first and getting the most likes and rts as possible, its not hard to wait for the official pic that drops in 2-3 days

 

[Halloween]

Chainsawman in the top five again has me overjoyed.

 

[4Eyes]

So Double Taisei seems to be doing decently. I'm truly surprised.

 

[Mankichi Togawa]

it's not in your hands, he has original pics and he can put a watermark or cut it !

Can you ask SpyTrue why he avoids posting Act-age and Jujutsu color pages when they get them, please? Discrimination of some Jump titles is just misinformation.

I hope he posts Act-age and Jujutsu color pages next week now that is confirmed both of them are getting color pages.

 

[ScotchAianB]

Rica was saying that it's a copyrighted image that SpyTrue most definitely does not own/did not create, thus the fact that he should not put his watermark on it. There's literally no need and it's not even the correct usage of a watermark. It's irrelevant WHO has the magazine if they don't actually own the content of the page. Which he doesn't.

We know, it's illegal.
But Spytrue put watermark to take some attention (support to continue), he just clear it and kill him.

 

[MangAniMY]

FOMO and clout searching is what wrong with this community nowadays,

if you say that want to give exposure, Weekly Jump sure doesn't need any amount at the moment, if anyone is claiming that right now, I'm sure that in reality it is the other way around,

if you really want to give exposure, do it to less popular magazines, heck do it to Sunday and Magazine if you claim you can help promote it,

what kiirobon and manga mogura are doing is giving exposures, what weekly jump leakers are doing is riding off Jump popularity

 

[Mankichi Togawa]

Can you ask SpyTrue why he avoids posting Act-age and Jujutsu color pages when they get them, please? Discrimination of some Jump titles is just misinformation.

I hope he posts Act-age and Jujutsu color pages next week now that is confirmed both of them are getting color pages.

Please, @ScotchAianB , ask him that. Jujutsu Kaisen and Act-age deserve to get the same treatment rest of Shonen Jump titles.

 

[RafGL]

you Shouldnt need to clear the Watermark of @Spytrue to post here !

The Original one by @Spytrue here:

You know what, I was not gonna answer since this is probably the most childish, stupid and incoherent thing I have ever encountered in my whole life when it comes to sharing content or leaks from WSJ. Seriously like, why should I be posting or sharing stuff with some random watermark some guy put because he/she has a picture of it? Lemme explain what I mean with this: why should I support someone who is crediting himself of posting registered and official content from a japanese magazine when it's not theirs? Isn't it like, I don't know, watching some piece of art in a museum or exhibition, taking a picture out of it and uploading it to the internet with my personal watermark?

You know, I'm a graphic designer and I'm really conscious when it comes to sharing/posting others people content, fanarts, works and stuff. And I honestly get pretty mad when someone with a lot of influence shares some content without crediting the original artist. The problem here is, this is not the case. We are not talking about this guy creating his own content and posting it on the Internet, we are talking about a situation of spreading information and content from third parties that we should actually not be seeing or knowing it exists. We are talking about a situation where some guy who gets this magazine pretty early is atributting the work he's showing in the Internet to himself. And I'm pretty much sorry, but I seriously consider no one has the right to credit himself as the owner of a content he or she has not created wholly (or using 'fair use') theirselves.

You know, this is all content we could perfectly wait for to be completely online and with high-quality scans on Sunday/Monday. And we could spread it the same way and we still wouldn't have any right to use some kind of random watermark over that work as if it were ours. The only thing this 'watermark thing' makes me feel is that the only purpose of spreading this content is not to entertain/inform/make other people know about it, but only self-satisfaction, praise, fame and dissemination. It shows the only purpose you guys have is to have your names all over the Internet, over every single forum that shares WSJ-related content, instead of just spreading content and information that everybody wants to know about because we enjoy sharing and discussing about it.

I really shouldn't have written any of this, because it's completely useless due to the disposition and behaviour you're showing, and I know you probably couldn't care less about this. But I got a bit mad and I guess I needed to release all of this. Stop acting like gods of information as if you controlled everything we know and we were obligated to praise and recognize the 'effort' you do in showing pictures that we can perfectly get in a few days. It's seriously really unfortunate for me to have to write this fucking essay. That's all my words on the matter. Keep spamming me or blocking me on Twitter, I couldn't care less.

 

[Halloween]

So Double Taisei seems to be doing decently. I'm truly surprised.

Is it officially ranked?

 

[ScotchAianB]

Can you ask SpyTrue why he avoids posting Act-age and Jujutsu color pages when they get them, please? Discrimination of some Jump titles is just misinformation.

I hope he posts Act-age and Jujutsu color pages next week now that is confirmed both of them are getting color pages.

You can ask him also.

 

[Mankichi Togawa]

Is it officially ranked?

No. Samurai 8 first ranked chapter is next week btw

 

[ScotchAianB]

You know what, I was not gonna answer since this is probably the most childish, stupid and incoherent thing I have ever encountered in my whole life when it comes to sharing content or leaks from WSJ. Seriously like, why should I be posting or sharing stuff with some random watermark some guy put because he/she has a picture of it? Lemme explain what I mean with this: why should I support someone who is crediting himself of posting registered and official content from a japanese magazine when it's not theirs? Isn't it like, I don't know, watching some piece of art in a museum or exhibition, taking a picture out of it and uploading it to the internet with my personal watermark?

You know, I'm a graphic designer and I'm really conscious when it comes to sharing/posting others people content, fanarts, works and stuff. And I honestly get pretty mad when someone with a lot of influence shares some content without crediting the original artist. The problem here is, this is not the case. We are not talking about this guy creating his own content and posting it on the Internet, we are talking about a situation of spreading information and content from third parties that we should actually not be seeing or knowing it exists. We are talking about a situation where some guy who gets this magazine pretty early is atributting the work he's showing in the Internet to himself. And I'm pretty much sorry, but I seriously consider no one has the right to credit himself as the owner of a content he or she has not created wholly (or using 'fair use') theirselves.

You know, this is all content we could perfectly wait for to be completely online and with high-quality scans on Sunday/Monday. And we could spread it the same way and we still wouldn't have any right to use some kind of random watermark over that work as if it were ours. The only thing this 'watermark thing' makes me feel is that the only purpose of spreading this content is not to entertain/inform/make other people know about it, but only self-satisfaction, praise, fame and dissemination. It shows the only purpose you guys have is to have your names all over the Internet, over every single forum that shares WSJ-related content, instead of just spreading content and information that everybody wants to know about because we enjoy sharing and discussing about it.

I really shouldn't have written any of this, because it's completely useless due to the disposition and behaviour you're showing, and I know you probably couldn't care less about this. But I got a bit mad and I guess I needed to release all of this. Stop acting like gods of information as if you controlled everything we know and we were obligated to praise and recognize the 'effort' you do in showing pictures that we can perfectly get in a few days. It's seriously really unfortunate for me to have to write this fucking essay. That's all my words on the matter. Keep spamming me or blocking me on Twitter, I couldn't care less.

You choose that way.

 

[Mankichi Togawa]

So, @ScotchAianB what's your opinion about Jujutsu Kaisen and Act-age being the only Jump titles that SpyTrue doesn't deliberately give any information or color pages purposely? That, in my opinion, damages his reputation as leaker since he shows bias.

 

[Maxy Barnard]

You know what, I was not gonna answer since this is probably the most childish, stupid and incoherent thing I have ever encountered in my whole life when it comes to sharing content or leaks from WSJ. Seriously like, why should I be posting or sharing stuff with some random watermark some guy put because he/she has a picture of it? Lemme explain what I mean with this: why should I support someone who is crediting himself of posting registered and official content from a japanese magazine when it's not theirs? Isn't it like, I don't know, watching some piece of art in a museum or exhibition, taking a picture out of it and uploading it to the internet with my personal watermark?

You know, I'm a graphic designer and I'm really conscious when it comes to sharing/posting others people content, fanarts, works and stuff. And I honestly get pretty mad when someone with a lot of influence shares some content without crediting the original artist. The problem here is, this is not the case. We are not talking about this guy creating his own content and posting it on the Internet, we are talking about a situation of spreading information and content from third parties that we should actually not be seeing or knowing it exists. We are talking about a situation where some guy who gets this magazine pretty early is atributting the work he's showing in the Internet to himself. And I'm pretty much sorry, but I seriously consider no one has the right to credit himself as the owner of a content he or she has not created wholly (or using 'fair use') theirselves.

You know, this is all content we could perfectly wait for to be completely online and with high-quality scans on Sunday/Monday. And we could spread it the same way and we still wouldn't have any right to use some kind of random watermark over that work as if it were ours. The only thing this 'watermark thing' makes me feel is that the only purpose of spreading this content is not to entertain/inform/make other people know about it, but only self-satisfaction, praise, fame and dissemination. It shows the only purpose you guys have is to have your names all over the Internet, over every single forum that shares WSJ-related content, instead of just spreading content and information that everybody wants to know about because we enjoy sharing and discussing about it.

I really shouldn't have written any of this, because it's completely useless due to the disposition and behaviour you're showing, and I know you probably couldn't care less about this. But I got a bit mad and I guess I needed to release all of this. Stop acting like gods of information as if you controlled everything we know and we were obligated to praise and recognize the 'effort' you do in showing pictures that we can perfectly get in a few days. It's seriously really unfortunate for me to have to write this fucking essay. That's all my words on the matter. Keep spamming me or blocking me on Twitter, I couldn't care less.

I mean in short... yeah? These dudes are already shady as hell, not gonna stroke their egos over them leaking stuff. Just sharing it at all is supposed to be the point surely

 

[SalesNerd69]

No. Samurai 8 first ranked chapter is next week btw

Wouldn't it be 2 weeks from? This week is ch7 so next week is ch 8 and then they'd have actual data?

 

[Mankichi Togawa]

Wouldn't it be 2 weeks from? This week is ch7 so next week is ch 8 and then they'd have actual data?

Is next week. Chapter 8 is first ranked chapter.

 

[Halloween]

Wouldn't it be 2 weeks from? This week is ch7 so next week is ch 8 and then they'd have actual data?

Chapter 8 is next week.

--- Double Post Merged, Jun 20, 2019, Original Post Date: Jun 20, 2019 ---

So, apparently this is a preview of an upcoming Jump GIGA poster. I decided to post it here because it's a Jump series, and one that's fairly popular.

Fujimoto, you glorious bastard.

 

[WyldViolet]

In regards to space adventures, they all sucked to what Toriko was gonna do anyway

Galaxy Gangs when?

 

[savethecat]

Personally I don’t believe that Robot X Laserbeam was axed. It wasn’t the biggest seller, but it was still doing decent enough. I feel like it’s more likely that the creator just either lost interest, or just couldn’t work on it anymore for whatever reason, so he just ended it.

--- Double Post Merged, Jun 20, 2019, Original Post Date: Jun 20, 2019 ---

I'd argue that Innoue is bigger than Kishi. What Innoue seems to be able to do is very rare tho.
I doubt Oda will return after OP given how he'd be 70 by then but if he does, it'll be interesting to see the direction he would take.


Oh wow. I remember people saying they were from Narutoforum over here and how they found this place so much better.
I'd say the quality has gone down triple times in the last 2-4 months alone.

I think Oda will be in his early 50s at most when One Piece ends.