It was just a topic the other day somewhere else and I advocated in favour of people changing and caring about others but
)))--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
I think it is. We should vote on whether if someone gets his account or run a lottery or something for his players.
but what's the point of him trading when he wouldn't care anyway? ANd on what basis?
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I think the veto count should be 6, so there's a majority of 6/10 teams voting against a transaction.aiight i put the LM cape and vetoed that nonsense.
i set the required votes to veto to 5.
If anyone not named faust have complains about it let us know.
no more drama please
Tbh I still agree and think this should happen because like... what's going to happen if I get those players? Bel's already kicking my ass, and it's not like I'll be able to beat others anyway. I mean, I've fucked up anyway and probably will continue doing so, so.
cancelled the trade because it's simply nonsense that turned into a bigger drama than it is. It would be the equivalent of you getting your ass kicked, getting mad and deciding to give up and to give jokic for free to another player just so he can avenge you. If such thing is allowed there is no need to continue playing, might as well start playing alliances and call it a day. LM exist to stop such thing from happening.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
those team should be left as they are if the owner doesn't care anymore. giving them away would be unfair to peoples who played well to this point. And i'm saying this as someone who is 3-7
--- Double Post Merged, ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Don't think there's any harm in doing a lottery for those we think could use a leg up like yourself. Would need to weigh it against what is a solid team for the top few and then the middle ground but even if it was just letting you have ONE guy I think that'd at least breathe some life back into your team.
I get what you mean but Faust was given way too much shit, and Bel was looked upon poorly too for accepting a trade that any of us would've accepted had we been in that position; if anyone says they wouldn't they're just lying at that point lmao. Maybe I missed it but @Hardy should apologize to Faust, no need for some of the language he used when addressing him and he really could've handled it better. Also understand your point but I don't think I'm like that :P
Need to strike a balance between keeping things balanced as they are and trying to get all 8 playing teams competitively. I wouldn't be against giving Milly a single crumb; maybe one of those big skronkers just so he's not flat out broke even if some of it was his own doing
Maybe that's just me feeling bad for Naruto ruining him all those years ago.That's fair then.
Worried about the Lakers? We've still got one of the better records in the league, we didn't have AD or LeBron that game BUT we did see great performances from Trezz, Kuzma and Schroder. Did you see their fantasy scores? Schroder 53, and Trezz + Kuzma got 44 each! That's what we've been NEEDING from them my boy, shame we lost but it's not the end of the world. Overreacting to this would be like overreacting to that Lakers v Nets game, both were missing people so who gives a shit?Sam worry for your Lakers, ya'll lost to the kings?
--- Double Post Merged, 10 minutes ago ---
Oh i see Lebron wasn't playing, that's rare
We still favourites in the west once AD is back and healthy. People need to put more respect on Schroder's name because if he gets a little more consistent then it really will be almost like having a big 3 as he's vital to the team. Also Vogel needs to give more minutes to Trezz and that lady ref who gave him a technical for saying "and 1" needs to get her shit together 
Absurdly overpaid? I gave him Bojan who was having a terrible season (hands down, he kinda had a breakthrough later on) and Drummond, and got two players that I could use. It was a balanced trade.
I remembered you giving more '-''' yeah that's fine.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
One guy means 150+ points per week. He would had gotten 1700 last week without using the free agents. It's absurd.Don't think there's any harm in doing a lottery for those we think could use a leg up like yourself. Would need to weigh it against what is a solid team for the top few and then the middle ground but even if it was just letting you have ONE guy I think that'd at least breathe some life back into your team.
I get what you mean but Faust was given way too much shit, and Bel was looked upon poorly too for accepting a trade that any of us would've accepted had we been in that position; if anyone says they wouldn't they're just lying at that point lmao. Maybe I missed it but @Hardy should apologize to Faust, no need for some of the language he used when addressing him and he really could've handled it better. Also understand your point but I don't think I'm like that :P
Need to strike a balance between keeping things balanced as they are and trying to get all 8 playing teams competitively. I wouldn't be against giving Milly a single crumb; maybe one of those big skronkers just so he's not flat out broke even if some of it was his own doing
That's fair then.
Worried about the Lakers? We've still got one of the better records in the league, we didn't have AD or LeBron that game BUT we did see great performances from Trezz, Kuzma and Schroder. Did you see their fantasy scores? Schroder 53, and Trezz + Kuzma got 44 each! That's what we've been NEEDING from them my boy, shame we lost but it's not the end of the world. Overreacting to this would be like overreacting to that Lakers v Nets game, both were missing people so who gives a shit?
--- Double Post Merged, ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
With very little managing he could be very close or ahead of Mazino actually.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
--- Double Post Merged, ---
LOOOL so I have pressure to get points and deal with this?i get tired just seeing all those long posts, feel like it's been a never ending drama since yesterday lol i just want to chill while i have a lead on bob.
@goldb deal with this everything por favor, you also have LM rights
But wouldn't you prefer having better players and having more chances of winning instead of knowing you'll lose and just rotating because you feel you have to be active in some way?
Yep, and even losers like scav who don't have at least 4 wins or 5, depending on how you want to go about it. It'd make things more even and fun.