- Joined
- Apr 1, 2016
- Messages
- 1,152
- Reaction score
- 1,861
- Age
- 33
- Country
-
So King in Yonkou leveled? Wow. lmao!King is stronger than Marco who is close to Big Mom who is as strong as Kaido.
So King in Yonkou leveled? Wow. lmao!King is stronger than Marco who is close to Big Mom who is as strong as Kaido.
Just like we have no evidence of King being stronger than Yamato, there's no evidence of Marco being stronger individually than King and Queen, and in fact it can easily be argued that there's evidence of the opposite even if you won't agree with it. King & Queen vs Marco wasn't a battle about strength and trying to simplify it to power levels is akin to not having understood the fight.I don't think they realize that Zoro fighting King means that he's currently, likely, not stronger than Marco so he'll lose to Marco rn. We know Marco is basically confirmed stronger than King & Queen individually and Zoro's going to extreme diff King in the future so...
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Lol you have no evidence of that, In fact, the opposite is closer to the truth. No one believes that Yamato's solo feats against Hybrid Kaido pale in comparison to *checks notes* King & Queen vs Marco. This is just some attempt to make King and thus Zoro stronger than they actually are at present. We see you.
I think his fire abilities will probably be Yonko level, based on the hype they have gotten.So King in Yonkou leveled? Wow. lmao!
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Do you stalk me ?Since you had to make a thread of "Zoro vs Whitebeard" over at WorstGen, i'm not surprised why your confused

When everyone was laughing at you for making a thread everyone assumed was a joke thread until you actually started arguing Zoro actually being stronger than Whitebeard.... yeah shit like that reaches my ears.Do you stalk me ?
![]()
Lol actually there's more than enough evidence. How is there evidence that King and Queen are each stronger though? Marco was exhausted fighting both at the same time before he fought King alone and still wasn't defeated as we saw this chapter.Just like we have no evidence of King being stronger than Yamato, there's no evidence of Marco being stronger individually than King and Queen, and in fact it can easily be argued that there's evidence of the opposite even if you won't agree with it.
Okay then you can't say that Marco was proven inferior then or even after vs King, either since Marco was exhausted while facing both as noted by Perospero and Marco himself.King & Queen vs Marco wasn't a battle about strength and trying to simplify it to power levels is akin to not having understood the fight.
What are you talking about though? Every one of them had extreme diff fights thus far except arguably Jinbei who was hyped as exceptionally strong by the CP0. Franky barely won, Robin needed Brooke's help for Maria's webs, Nami and Usopp were outclassed. Zoro extreme diffing King in the future is a logical conclusion to be drawn given how the story flows while Zoro right now being stronger than Marco has no foundation in canon, at all.Zoro "extreme diffing King" is another thing there's no evidence for that you're somehow using as fact. Going by how the strawhats are winning their fights so far, it certainly doesn't look like that will be the case for now.
So you are stalking me...When everyone was laughing at you for making a thread everyone assumed was a joke thread until you actually started arguing Zoro actually being stronger than Whitebeard.... yeah shit like that reaches my ears.
Even Reddit was laughing at you.
So if you think that's stalking... sure. I'm stalking you. Your trolling is beyond anything these forums have seen before.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I mean Zoro already disfigured the strongest top tier for life when at like 1% full power and is only going to get stronger but ok...Marco. Even after Zoro fights King, the fight will still be up in the air because the two will finally be actually comparable.
Once you reach a certain level in this series, things aren't instantly binary, so Zoro's victory over King does not mean he's immediately superior to Marco. Marco is a level where he should be capable of giving most of the top tiers a decent scuffle.
--- Double Post Merged, ---
Don't say this to @Pirate Queen, she thinks all YC1s are fodders who'd get low diffed by a top tier and will start calling you a Luffy downplayer.Marco. Even after Zoro fights King, the fight will still be up in the air because the two will finally be actually comparable.
Once you reach a certain level in this series, things aren't instantly binary, so Zoro's victory over King does not mean he's immediately superior to Marco. Marco is a level where he should be capable of giving most of the top tiers a decent scuffle.
Calling you out isn't being salty, and it's definitely ironic coming from someone like you.It didn't budge him, Your idea of bias = Not fact
And it was Zoro's strongest attack with seemingly CoC behind it. Kaido was more shaken by Red Roc and it wasn't even coated in CoC.
Your salt is sustaining the oceans Woro-kun, well done.
Luffy without CoC in his attack did this to Kaido
![]()
Zoro's strongest attack did this to kaido:
![]()
Now i am saying Zoro does not yet possess the fire power needed to surpass the damage needed to defeat Marco.
Zoro is by no means weak, but he's not quite there yet. Marco is a smaller target than Kaido for 1, Marco will utilize CoO whereas Kaido just tanks everything like he did with Zoro. His regeneration already makes it a extreme diff for Zoro.
I'll likely change my mind if Zoro learns to coat his attacks in CoC at the end of this current fight. I don't think Marco can tank CoC coated atacks for long. If at all with a stronger attack like "3 billion Worlds"
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
This didn't refute my point at all. Read back my post and try againIsn't Zoro downstairs fighting King while Yamato's still fighting Kaido ALONE? Lol!
Well... your original point didn't prove that current Zoro > Marco/Yamato in the first place so... I'm good.Calling you out isn't being salty, and it's definitely ironic coming from someone like you.
Knocking down is never relevant against kaido. Just see what luffy did on act 1. He threw kaido across the town and yet kaido just shrugged it off. Your logic fails. Next.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
This didn't refute my point at all. Read back my post and try again
Call me out for... stating facts? Not sure I get your logic.Calling you out isn't being salty, and it's definitely ironic coming from someone like you.
Knocking down is never relevant against kaido. Just see what luffy did on act 1. He threw kaido across the town and yet kaido just shrugged it off. Your logic fails. Next.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
This didn't refute my point at all. Read back my post and try again
I've told you this before. Injuring Kaido in his human form is not an impressive feat. Even Kiku and Kinemon could do that. The impressive feat is injuring a Kaido who is using his DF which is what gives him his crazy durability.Kaido was more shaken by Red Roc and it wasn't even coated in CoC.
Your salt is sustaining the oceans Woro-kun, well done.
Luffy without CoC in his attack did this to Kaido
![]()
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
You're so close to getting itI don't recall Luffy scarring him either
If Yamato and Luffy didn't have DFs they'd be weaklings but sure Zoro is the cheat just because he uses a powerful sword....neither have a sword with Oden's presence in it so...
Still waiting for the proof that current Zoro > current Yamato.You're so close to getting it
Point is his sword specifically lets him scar Kaido yet it doesn't push him above people like Luffy who haven't scarred him. So saying he scarred Kaido and Yamato did not so he's stronger is just a headcanon. The scar was also inferior to Oden's and Zoro himself lamented that he couldn't even push him down with it so spar us, please. lolIf Yamato and Luffy didn't have DFs they'd be weaklings but sure Zoro is the cheat just because he uses a powerful sword....
Lol you're the one not getting it, obviously.LMAO
Also how does is it matter whether Zoro is only strong because of his sword ?
He has that sword doesn't he ?
The same Oden's presence will be used against Marco in this fight.
That's like saying Iron Man is weaker than Captain America because he's only strong because of his suit
or Green Lantern is weaker than Aquaman because he is only strong because of his ring.
I don't remember writing Zoro isn't allowed to use Enma in the OP smh
When thinking about Zoro vs Marco you acknowledge Marco's regeneration is a special kind of troublesome that goes beyond power or strength.And this same sword isn't one shotting King rn so the argument that he'd easily handle Marco who actually has regeneration, with this sword, is laughable.
If Zoro extreme diffs King in the future then the argument that current Zoro > Marco would be laughable (more laughable).
The fact that you guys think Marco is inferior to King is where this issue is stemming from. Zoro rn isn't proven to be stronger than King yet since we don't know if he is going to power up to beat King in this fight.When thinking about Zoro vs Marco you acknowledge Marco's regeneration is a special kind of troublesome that goes beyond power or strength.
But you completely ignore that "detail" when considering how did Marco hold King and Queen for so long, which was only thanks to his regeneration. Not to say all of Marco's merits lay on his DF, but most of them do: someone like him, who can literally ignore being attacked because not even haki can "hurt" him, still failed to deal King or Queen significant damage before getting too tired to continue. That it was a 1 vs 2 barely matters when Marco could have focused on dealing damage to both or at least one of them while totally ignoring the attacks... and, in fact, going by the chapter of fighting we did see, it appears that's what he tried, but he completely failed at it.
After Zoro defeats King, which is about to happen, saying that Marco is on his level on anything other than his regeneration will be laughable.
The fact that you guys think King is inferior to Marco is where this issue is stemming from. See? I can use the exact same argument as you did. The fact that I disagree with you doesn't mean "the issue lays on me because you can't possibly be wrong", as your wording seemed to imply.The fact that you guys think Marco is inferior to King is where this issue is stemming from. Zoro rn isn't proven to be stronger than King yet since we don't know if he is going to power up to beat King in this fight.
Thus, no one has any reason to believe that Marco who is hyped as admiral leveled (can fight equally with admirals) in databooks, who is WB's right hand and who was exhausted when holding off both King and Queen, is inferior to King or Zoro. It also would make no sense for Whitebeard's top commander to be weaker than Kaido or Big Mom's.
So really there is no evidence confirming that Zoro is stronger than King right now, let alone Marco.
Lol our arguments aren't the same though. You guys are the same ones who say WB > Kaido & Big Mom and WB has the strongest crew of the emperors. BUT because you need King to be stronger than Marco so Zoro's victory can be more grand, now suddenly Marco being =/> King is just as likely as him being weaker. You guys are sooooooo transparent. But we all knew this was inevitable when Zoro became King's opponent.The fact that you guys think King is inferior to Marco is where this issue is stemming from. See? I can use the exact same argument as you did. The fact that I disagree with you doesn't mean "the issue lays on me because you can't possibly be wrong", as your wording seemed to imply.
1) Marco's databook hype exists unlike King's.I won't repost my entire previous post where I explained why I believe Marco is weaker than King according to the recent events, none of which you tried to refute. Instead, you're basing your whole argument for King's powerlevel on:
1- Marco's hype from a databook. (Damn, where was this databook acceptance when the vivre card suggested Mihawk is stronger than Shanks).
2- "Whitebeard's subordinates should be stronger than Kaido's because I say so".
And you can be back because if Zoro gets a new power up to beat King then I would be right. Furthermore even then we'd not know for sure if he's above Marco since Marco, as I said, is likely stronger than King even marginally. So you'd need more than extreme diffing King to prove Zoro beats Marco 1 vs 1 now.You want to hold the argument until Zoro defeats King (which is set on stone) because he may grow stronger during the fight? Alright, that part is fair. Zoro after an additional powerup wouldn't be "current Zoro", even though current Zoro would just be half a fight away from unlocking a powerup naturally so he'd also get it against Marco anyway. I'll be back when Zoro is done with Marco's superior fighter (I strain the word fighter, Marco is superior in other aspects, even on the battlefield, but definitely not in a 1vs1 based on their feats, showings and hype).
Well last time I checked, Marco's fire is special and isn't bound by the same rules as other, normal forms of fire. In fact he was able to nullify Prometheus' fire just like Zoro and Kinemon's cutting technique, funny enough. So again, you need evidence that Marco's magical fire operates like Prometheus' for example and that this somehow means he can't use it to regenerate if Zoro slashes him.It's also very unfortunate for Marco that Zoro just mastered the art of cutting fire. Of course, until Marco's regeneration runs off, Zoro would still not be able to kill/defeat Marco no matter what he tried (nor would anyone else without a hax skill that overcomes his DF, but those characters are very few and exceptions), but just like King can outlast Marco's regeneration with his stamina and ancient zoan recovery, Zoro can just cut Marco's flame attacks and block/tank/dodge the melee stuff while mincing Marco.
I don't know where everyone is getting this headcanon that Marco cannot inflict damage. Just because he uses regeneration and heals, doesn't mean he can't fight. This obsession with dismissing healers is so typical and widespread in this male dominated, Western, manga fandom. We've seen him beat up King and Queen together and this is ignoring the fact that he's able to use observation & armament confirmed in his VC.A battle with Marco is just a battle of endurance. If Katakuri fought against him, it would be a battle of Katakuri dodging everything and Marco regenerating everything until one ran out of stamina, just like Marco vs King is regeneration vs endurance. Marco's big disadvantage when compared to other Yonkou Commanders is that he has failed to show good feats of damage dealing despite getting plenty hits onscreen on enemies, which is why I believe he gets outlasted in these matchups.
Welcome to the forums. Enjoy your stay.First of all hello everyone!
The series went out of its way to point out that Zoro put everything he had into the attack, from having it be his first demonstration of CoC, something that usually awakens fully during desperate moments, to having the character flat out say that that was the strongest attack he could muster, which is confirmed given that that was the only attack that scarred Kaido, despite the fact that Zoro had cut him previously already. Think of when Luffy dug deep and did his first Jet Gatling against Lucci. No one would say that a healthy Luffy could've done that from the jump and beaten Lucci sooner because we saw Luffy giving it his all already.Those 2 fights can't be compared. Zoro had all of his bones broken at that time and still managed to hurt Kaido more than anyone before in that fight. If he was uninjured he could probably stall Kaido for some time. On the other hand Yamato is fighting her father who wants her to be next Shogun, of course Kaido isn't that serious in that fight.
Two things. It was a cut, not a stab and the punch is worst. Because, in this case, the punch has been literally said to destroy things from the inside. Getting rocked in the face or stomach and having your head scrambled from the inside is probably the less fun alternative. Given Kaido's reaction to Luffy's hits in comparison to Zoro's makes that pretty clear. We've yet to see Yamato's results, I imagine he's put in enough work to odd out the evens for Luffy.And for those who say that Kaido was still standing after Zoro's attack, what do you think is worse, when someone punches you and you fall to the ground or when someone stabs you and you are still standing? I would say that stab wound is much worse even though you didn't fall from the impact.
no, i don't call out people for stating facts. I do call out people with failed logic. No offense.Call me out for... stating facts? Not sure I get your logic.
Did you know if you add potatoes to a meal it removes the salt? Try eating potatoes, homie.

--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
now this is a good analysis. It shows the supporting points for marco but also doesn't deliberately bash at zoro feats. Unlike the two failures i talked with beforeFirst of all hello everyone!
For now i would still give this fight to Marco since he was fighting both King and Queen at once and still helping others but things would probably be different after Zoro's fight with King.
One thing i have a problem with though is some ppl saying that Yamato is fighting Kaido and Zoro only slashed him and couldn't keep him occupied as long as Yamato so that means Yamato is stronger.
Those 2 fights can't be compared. Zoro had all of his bones broken at that time and still managed to hurt Kaido more than anyone before in that fight. If he was uninjured he could probably stall Kaido for some time. On the other hand Yamato is fighting her father who wants her to be next Shogun, of course Kaido isn't that serious in that fight.
And for those who say that Kaido was still standing after Zoro's attack, what do you think is worse, when someone punches you and you fall to the ground or when someone stabs you and you are still standing? I would say that stab wound is much worse even though you didn't fall from the impact.