All above. Because 2 negates 1, and makes it false. "It's okay to be gay, as long as (my) children don't see any in public or in media". That means you place homosexual relationships into unequal standing in comparison to heteronormative relationships. So it's ok to be gay, only if it happens in my terms, out of my children's sight. Which means expressing homosexuality isn't okay.

I guess i might be.
Went to the least acknowledged site to find source about everything with the word homophobia and found this:
Homophobia encompasses a range of negative
attitudes and feelings toward
homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being
lesbian,
gay,
bisexual or
transgender (
LGBT).
[1][2][3] It has been defined as
contempt,
prejudice, aversion,
hatred or
antipathy, may be based on irrational
fear and ignorance, and is also related to
religious beliefs.
[4][5]
Homophobia is observable in critical and hostile behavior such as
discrimination and
violence on the basis of
sexual orientations that are
non-heterosexual.
[1][2][6] Recognized types of homophobia include
institutionalized homophobia, e.g. religious homophobia and state-sponsored homophobia, and
internalized homophobia, experienced by people who have same-sex attractions, regardless of how they identify.
[7][8]
Just the first line tells that if you say NO to a gay thing, makes you homophobic. Because the
range isn't explained at all, but denotes that must be negative. This screams
TOLERANCE indeed, exactly what the gay movements wants...
I also have no idea what you mean by "gay movement", but that sounds to me that looking for equal rights to the LGBTQ+ community is "shit". Which is also homophobic.
Man, please.
How come you understand that when i'm saying: "gay movement" is that i'm classifying it as shitty. To me the gay movement is abhorrent, not just "shitty".
You know me, i will tell things by what they are, unless i'm joking or using irony.
So you seriously think, that making children aware thorough media that gay people exists (as they do) leads to children to not learning how babies are made or what is marriage? There is a billion on children's films on those subject, and a gay kiss in one film wont negate that. Learning one thing doesn't negate learning another thing. You can do both math and art in school. Your logic makes absolutely zero sense.
I can tell you what i seriously think:
I think that those themes should be informed in time to children... from their parents, not movies nor media, nor everything else.
There is billions of movies about parents refusing to teach their children what sex is... exactly because parents want to their children to be fully prepared to face the sex topic.
What is this obsession with sex? We are still talking about a children's movie of space rangers fighting alien robots? What has "passing of genes" to anything with that? The kids will have biology, health and sex education in their lives later, when it is more topical. Having this kind of exposure just makes kids see, that some boys like boys and thats that - they'll just be less likely to judgmental and rude when they encounter this later in adult life.
You don't get my first argument about the sex part.
Let's use Disney kisses to explain my point:
Every story portrayed here ends the same way. with them as a couple. So what they do formalize themselves as couple? The kiss.
Now that this is explained... let's go to what the word
Couple is:
Couple as noun: two people who are married or otherwise closely associated romantically or sexually.
Couple as verb: mate or have sexual intercourse
The kid watching the Disney movie sees the couple at the end, and will ask, are they married? Yes would be the answer.
Married = Couple for his underaged mind.
So, as it is proved to be interconnected, they will understand that the Kiss is the first step in order to have a couple, to have sex.
Now, second part of my argument: The difference between the heterosexual kiss from the homosexual kiss.
Every teen and adult can perfectly be aware that sex might be considered a leisure recreation, that is a lovely act performed to bond with someone else. But as we're talking about children,
would you want children to have sex? If the answer is no, then we can proceed.
As the responsible parent that wouldn't want that to happen, they will explain to their children what's marriage and its importance in the society (damn hell it is important, it happens in every nook of the planet). And there it lands my own appreciation of what's truth, what's important: Creating a legacy, having an offspring with genes from their parents. I'm using the world's most known contract for that goal, following that
mission.
That... can only happen with an heterosexual couple.
Homosexual couples do sex... for leisure, love it is for sure, but fails to what i want, what "life" wants.
Do you understand my concern now?
Will a parent want that?
Have you actually ever talked to a kid who has encountered gay people? I have - they are usually just very uninterested and just proceed eating sand and stuffing legos in their noses.
Awesome man, but not forget that we're talking about content that millions of children will watch.
Here something a bit different happens:
Kids in gays movement protest
School teachers announcing gay movement standarts, also discriminating everybody who doesn't thinks like them.. adults to children, yeah.
School libraries with books about paedophilic stories between kids and adults.
So, the question is... what would be the answer of these children taught sex -not from their parents, but media and school- to the question:
Hey kid, would you want to have sex with an adult?
The answer will be yes.
Do you see the importance about why such theme in a kid movie appears??
It's sad because we will never know it.
There is money involved to become the world a
cesspool of filth and depravity.
That's homophobic as fuck. Straight people can be in media, but gay people can't because it hurts the children and some peoples feelings? So gay people should just pretend to not exist?
Nah, as i said many times, there is nothing wrong with gay movies made for teens and adults:
Last movie i saw about the subject, got nothing against it.
Also, you do not want the world to change? Like at all? What do you define as the peak world, or the world before "change" started? 1950s? The early 1800s?
World changes as we develope and learn. We have learned that being gay is totally normal occurrence in biological world and learned that it doesn't hurt anyone. Let just people be who they are, and be seen and accepted as they are.
A good world will be when humans dissapear of existence.
But answering the question about what/how the gay movement has changed the world, under my impression would be:
-They want to impose their new language, using occidental languages but with their own changes and forcing people to speak like them.
-They changed my actual justice system where any sort of gay of that movement has more rights than woman and men, obviously to remember all that women also has more rights than men. Equality they demand...
-They are also paying for a section of my country's new constitution to lower the age of sexual consent to children of 10 years old.
-Schools as portrayed in the video, are teaching stuff that is completely outside subjects such as maths and arts, they want to force schools to teach sexual education... not just teens, children.
-They have countless to name sexual orientations, genders, types of humans, types of situations, etc... confusing teens (it's directly at them) for one single goal:
Needless to say that my own country's leader of the gay movement is an acknowledged paedophile, but justice doesn't do his work because of the corruption in the system, he's above the girl talking in the video trying to normalize going for children.
The damage they are doing is huge, what the world knew as normal, it won't be anymore, and this is just happening in the "liberty" of democracy, there will be a moment when that liberty will dissapear, and face the problem as i'm doing now, will be prohibited and surely will outcast me.
So, i think it's obvious for a reasonable person to understand that taking side with those guys, makes you a criminal.
Ust, don't be a criminal
