--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Believe? Shouldn't you be certain...
Being blunt, I flagged my very diminished ability to play repeatedly when I first marked myself as pending for the game in the mafia discussion page and when confirming for the game so you can cram it up your cadbury chute if that's an issue for you. I've got a lot of shit on my plate and I don't take kindly to the assertions you're making.
Odd thing to nitpick. Her being the boss is the only conclusion I could come to upon getting the result and I was uncertain of whether that score counted night actions or not when I got the result. By the time I'd gone to clarify whether it counted night action or not (which was as I was reading through the thread), I found that the question had already been asked in this thread so it saved me a PM to the hosts to clarify so yes, I'm certain she is the boss.
but if you legit perhaps you could reuse your n1 action 
?
I'm 100% sure you're scum, and since I checked Lambu I know at least he's not boss so that's probably you.
As you see, Sam is saying I'm boss. We can't be in the same group. So yeah there is a scum between Lambu and Wojak as well.
You came into this game and said you'd be good in 12hrs.... 2 days later still excuses. You're excuse-prone as mafia, it just looks like the same old story.
Okay, so it's not a belief now. You get some points for voting shino straight away, however, you haven't stood by it strongly. This is a nitpick because you're already viewed poorly due to excuses and avoiding the thread. Using language such as 'I believe' when you claim to have '100' is not strong enough, imo. Noting we recently witnessed you go drunk all-in on lynching someone when you had an uncalibrated result. This game, as far as I know, the analyst has no sanity constraints. It's hard to view you as town on how you've interacted and acted, but I suppose another night might tell more.
So what do you suggest? lynch me or Sam to resolve the situation? even still maybe checking me and seeing what results the other Analysts give will help sort them out (not saying I want to be lynched tho ewww!).
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
Aha so there was double action on Holt, if I check him I should find his score 150 (If, If Lambu is telling the truth!!).Night 1 anal inspections kind of go in circle, which was expected because they were most sus
-wojak -> claims sam but to be blocked, denied by the townie blockers
-shino -> claims lamb with 0 points
-lamb -> claims holt with 0 points
-Sam -> claims shino with 100 points
Outside the group outliner is the holt result, which target-wise still makes sense, as the enforcer claims have a mole too, but definitely @Lambu 's investigation is against the majority, but I can share the concerns
In fact, I might add, I blocked @Holt n1. I thought him to be the most suspicious in our group, yet for mafia the savest to perform the kill (other options being Van 100% mafia, and analysts 50%)
Fuck you Holt if you tried to kill me that's what you get
But if lambu is a green also then this would be already 2 people targetting Holt per night and would increase his score
I don't know don't ask me!!! We could be facing a mafia team with a core of Van-Lamb-Holt, which is like 70% of the remaining brain power
Do they do a random block to throw everyone off? will they weirdly tie themselves or fight each other?? I'm bit paranoid about some 4D chess moves, and ALSO, since 4 mafia with 14 is a high mafia ratio, maybe there are actually Lovers and we cannot trust the "confirmed" one either!!
There's a plethora of responses I have for that which I won't let fly but I've had quite a turbulent last couple of days and issues that I don't want to harp on about because then people would be all "He's just making excuses, he's scum". If I don't speak up about my issues then apparently I'm just avoidant and full of shit. I can't fucking win no matter what I fucking do.
If I didn't trust the conclusion I came to upon my result then I wouldn't of voted Shino. And you bring up last game as being brazen and go all-in. I absolutely hated how I played that det in hindsight and honestly I was also pretty fucking fed up with some of the shitstirring I copped and are still copping because of it. Maybe I'm not taking things as well because of everything I've got going on now but I'm fucking sick of it. I don't want to fuck up like that again and have to again be the fucking laughing stock of the fucking community again hence why I was initially tentative in case I was somehow missing something again. I really couldn't help but doubt myself after that fucking shitshow last game.
Bud that did not stop you in this very game.
Yea nah, you did that thing and you get the blowback, that's how it is. People are reasonable enough around here to know when there's an overstep and when to apologise. If you're feeling bad about it, you should know that you're not a laughing stock. In your way of looking at things it is banter, you'll cop some shit for it but then move on. If there is malicious intent people will point it out. But I'm not really good at this type of thing so good luck.
So the analysts mostly checked on each other.
Interesting that you would gamble the single block on an enforcer, that makes me pretty wary especially as hoe is the only overlapping role with the criminals. I’m still maintaining that sharing enforcer actions is not beneficial right now, but I would atleast say I did not target the enforcer claims
There’s a mafia analyst so telling the truth about checking doesn’t equal being legitimate, but like Brandish said, analysts should be going first, because it’s much easier to catch the lies when others haven’t shared their actions. Though tbf it’s important enough for boss
Sure, but also nobody died and I performed a block, that's an info town needs.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I meant unfair by the hosts. In that completely fictitious scenario I naturally wouldn't '3'
Why, but if you're town and juvi is mafia, which should be your standing right now, then why don't you share your thoughts on the other suspicious blocks - analysts and enforcers.
It's still information that has to be shared. And I haven't decided for sure who I'm gonna check. Interesting that you know my info will be true tho XD unlike Sam's bs.
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
From the townie's Analyst perspective, I found yourself in a group of 4 people, 2 legit townies and 2 scum, It's 50/50 for others but for me in this group, I know the chances to check a scum from the other 3 is high (2/3), and hopefully it helps to resolve the analysts situation, so targeting someone here was a priority. If anything I find Lambu's choice to check Holt is the weird one. Not saying I trust Holt.
Piss off, this comment is just another unnecessary dig at me and not only do I not appreciate it but I fail to see what shred of good this could possibly serve.
Wasn't holt's comment about 'telling the truth' a direct reply to you discussing whether Lambu was telling the truth?
Voting Board - Day 3 
