I agree with you, I don’t think it’s a good idea to lunch DD sushi for first day, if he’s real spy/det, we’re losing a lot here. Cause as I see it, spy can def catch some unprepared mafias lying about their roles/actions.Lynching DD now will left us without Spy if he was saying the truth, and if he isn't the real spy can't reveal it without being the next night killing objetive imo, there are other sus peoples so I not share targeting him in D1, maybe I'm too dumb to figure it lol but seems he'll be lynched anyway without my vote
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
I'll try to be back before day ends, catch u later
Cause as I see it, spy can def catch some unprepared mafias lying about their roles/actions.
So you belive a real spy/det would be voting ascend 40m and remain vanilla townie, which is what DD is claiming right now.I don’t agree with her reasoning either,
I understand the premise of losing a spy early in the game as we lost a spy, DD again, just the last game early and cooked. But how do you really interpret low number and ambiguous posta by him? I am not really voting like sure on DD so i still did not put a one, though how are you not suspicious for instance?I agree with you, I don’t think it’s a good idea to lunch DD sushi for first day, if he’s real spy/det, we’re losing a lot here. Cause as I see it, spy can def catch some unprepared mafias lying about their roles/actions.
I don’t like how pushy Natasha is amd I don’t agree with her reasoning either, because DD is very often used as fodder for mistaken lynches so
votekill Natasha
Not understanding such simple logic is weird.do you want to elaborate on this? The reasoning is sound. Given DD’s reveal, he would ideally be prioritising depth especially since investigative roles already take time. Voting in favor of surface would only handicap him.I don’t like how pushy Natasha is amd I don’t agree with her reasoning either, because DD is very often used as fodder for mistaken lynches so
He voted Otto, your avatar, before you posted so he didn't know it was you. Sam pointed out it could've been a mafia slip if you're teamed.Don’t know if the hosts confirmed if we should be voting more than once but I’ve modified mine to just one. Regarding DD, it’s odd indeed to vote for ascend rather than diving but there’s been a quite the insistence on DD even before then ?
It's not a ship, it's name and surname.How would you call him? I'm not writing Vali x lucifer every time. What is a vali x lucifer anyway. Why does he name himself after a presumably satanic ship?
Hello satanic shipping friend xDIt's not a ship, it's name and surname.
The X is there because the id was already taken the first time i used it, so i added an x in the middle.
Also, Val or whatever is absolutely fine, i don't mindIt's not a ship, it's name and surname.
The X is there because the id was already taken the first time i used it, so i added an x in the middle.
OhSince im dying anyway I have townie spy townie detective
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---
so 3 roles
Just using this quote to point out that given all that depth (depht ? detph ? ) mech there are probably a gew repetitive roles. We might have two people with spy roles, and 3 with det roles, just at different depht/deft/idk. Probably different sanities too. Sanity checking will most likely be annoying for them.and if he isn't the real spy can't reveal it without being the next night killing objetive imo
lolSam said he sus me but I don't know what exactly he found sus. Earlier also he said he's fine with any depth which didn't sit well with me, I feel mafia are the ones that are fine with any depth as they can kill with any role. And I'm guessing they have repeated roles between their member so they're generally fine. A townie would try to get the role they found better/stronger/more appealing.
Since i don't have firm suspects yet i just went with one pick that fit my theory but wasn't already voted to avoid placing a decisive vote early on, also because i am mostly a noob in this kind of game.Currently, one unit of sus is going towards Natasha, for post #90. A 4 colour suspicion tierlist leading into a vote that Lumi could then piggyback off of, all after 80-ish pretty uninspiring posts (and ofc my posts, which are all inspiring). It's a pretty hard sell, almost comes off as her trying a bit too hard.
On the flip side, her RP is great, and I don't lynch RPers on the first day by policy.
Honestly, the fact we seriously discussed whether the joke vote was anything but a bit for as long as we did feels like generated hot air, I'd bet at least one participant of that is scum.
Beyond that, Degojaru's posts have felt very safe. Despite having posted a lot, a lot of what had been posted feels like recap posts where they will simply reiterate or reframe something without adding their own two cents or attempting to shift the convo.
Oh, and I am very much trying to not OMGUS this, but:
Although I don't agree with the logic that early coordination is suspect, because it is often scum that overthink and fail to coordinate early compared to townies who just gotta put their chest into it knowing full well it ain't going to get easier or clearer over time, even if I were to follow that reasoning, you went for me and not, like, Sam or something? Huh...
--- Double Post Merged, , Original Post Date: ---