Games Mafia Game 145 - Vampire Crawlers - END GAME

[Lady pompom]

Sam and Pom are both parroting this avoidant Panda line and voting in accordance with it; did they rehearse this in the Mafia Pad beforehand

You mean Sam parroted me? Because I said it first. The whole problem people had against em D1 was how I changed suspects

 

[Tatsumaki]

@Lady pompom would you like to claim ?

 

[Lady pompom]

imo killing Pomcha will clarify some for us (me). We can figure out between Sam, Hardy and Nat how they're aligned towards her. So far I'm still trusting Marm and now I suppose Tatsu and Kako? I suppose I'd have to look into Dego and Vali too

It won’t. You’ll just lose a townie.

 

[Marmalade]

her hint was not even active or passive, she hinted "I’m a simple role too. I beam my magic to not let anyone close." which can be later on interpreted as like 90% of the roles in the game. a mafia would be inclined to hint like this to give themselves more freedom of claim later on, as I said, she didn't even lock herself from active/passive roles

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:51 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:50 PM ---

oh I'm talking about pom and talking with @Tatsumaki

That's a fair point to point out. I'm not sure if I like it in combination with the way she's approaching voting so far.

 

[Copy Panda]

My thought process wasn't that deep and has changed since then so I'll elaborate more tomorrow I think.

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 11:55 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 11:55 PM ---

In the list of things to talk about, I feel like we eluded the killless night too fast.

The thing is, we have far too little information for this to be a fruitful discussion. For instance, let's say a doc prevented a kill, or a prosti blocked a killer. If they reveal their target only (not their role), the mafia gains some kind of insight, whereas town remains in the dark. My intent was shot down, but I did mention that mass claiming could have been a decent idea in this small setting (perhaps too half-hearted; it was cast as a meta comment and, therefore, not useful). It's tricky. We also have no way of discovering recruitment. At most, we find out if there's poison in play next phase

 

[Lady pompom]

@Lady pompom would you like to claim ?

I pretty much claimed. I targeted Hardy last night and nobody died

 

[Tatsumaki]

I pretty much claimed. I targeted Hardy last night and nobody died

What ? when did you say this ?? but yeah duly noted then

--- Double Post Merged, Friday at 12:01 AM, Original Post Date: Friday at 12:00 AM ---

The thing is, we have far too little information for this to be a fruitful discussion. For instance, let's say a doc prevented a kill, or a prosti blocked a killer. If they reveal their target only (not their role), the mafia gains some kind of insight, whereas town remains in the dark. My intent was shot down, but I did mention that mass claiming could have been a decent idea in this small setting (perhaps too half-hearted; it was cast as a meta comment and, therefore, not useful). It's tricky. We also have no way of discovering recruitment. At most, we find out if there's poison in play next phase

Tomorrow might be it.

--- Double Post Merged, Friday at 12:02 AM ---

@Kakoha wanna claim ? and what do you think of Pom's 'claim' ?

--- Double Post Merged, Friday at 12:03 AM ---

I'm throwing questions but the truth is I really need to go to bed. So I'll read the answers tomorrow, sorry.

 

[Lady pompom]

What ? when did you say this ?? but yeah duly noted then

I am referring to the hints I gave D1, it was an obvious claim. But this is the firt time I’m saying target, don’t misunderstand.

No, you didnt, this is what I mean with your posts sound malicious like mafia framing someone.
1. Why are you relating my observation that people piling votes is suspicious with mu vote choice?
2. Me voting you had nothing to do with who piled votes it was your extremely scummy posts.
3.yes, the moment you suspect me for voting someone else that was not mentioned in my first few posts as suspects, you’re kinda binding me to vote the first people I suspected or I’ll be “sus” in your book. In other words I should either not say anything or ONLY say my suspects after a whole day of interactions when I am more likely to have a better idea of suspects

@Kakoha

 

[Marmalade]

I pretty much claimed. I targeted Hardy last night and nobody died

What made you pick hardy? He didn't really hint much at all if I recall, I'm trying to backroad that atm to see if I missed anything

 

[Lady pompom]

I just told you that your posts are worded and crafted maliciously, dissected questions for you to answer which you ignored purposefully, and then you tell me I did not address why I find your posts suspicious. Go backread the thread, when you find my posts, address myq questions and stop pretending I didn’t say anything, we can talk.

--- Double Post Merged, Thursday at 12:15 PM, Original Post Date: Thursday at 12:13 PM ---

Votekill Kakoha, I’m actually convinced you are scum with how evasive you are to address the questions posed

@Kakoha

 

[Kakoha]

@Kakoha wanna claim ? and what do you think of Pom's 'claim' ?

I thought she claimed blocker at first, but then okay, she claimed doc probably XD
anyways, idk if there'll be a counter claim, some player are afk so it basically alll depends now of it there's a counter claim

as for me, I really don't want to claim this early in the game

 

[Marmalade]

What made you pick hardy? He didn't really hint much at all if I recall, I'm trying to backroad that atm to see if I missed anything

I don't think I've ever heard of this theme. Apparently I'm Belmon't.

I was expecting a game with 13+ players, didn't follow sign ups after a while. 11 is a pretty shitty number if it means that there's 3 scums since it could give us some sort of turbo game. Usually you want to share as much as possible in those games but on the flipside it makes night targets much easier...

With all that in mind, I don't have much to say about my role.

This is all I can find, so I find it a bit of an odd pick over others who have let on more?

 

[Kakoha]

?? huh
what is the point of observation if you're not going to commit to it ?



care to elaborate ? you keep saying that but I can't see why my posts are scummy ? this is how I talk. I didn't play with you that much, so idk how you decided that now I'm not playing like my town self




no, you can sus whoever u want. but give actual reasons. I changed too, but I didn't go and say "hey btw I still think lawl is very sus on how he stacked the vote ... anyways, votelock randomperson". u gotta elaborate right away on your vote, not after being asked 1000 time and still saying the same argumen "seemed scummy", or my most favourite line I hate "gut feeling" Xp if you say any of those without elaborating any further, u admit to not wanting to give actual reasons and that your motives are hidden atm. which could have been okay if it wasn't day 1 and we still had 0 info from roles Xp

@Lady pompom all you had to do is scroll
and you got pinged 3 times in that post yet you still didn't see it and come to tell me I didn't answer

--- Double Post Merged, Friday at 12:09 AM, Original Post Date: Friday at 12:07 AM ---

@Kakoha

how is that even a question ? you just said something with no sense to it
what was I supposed to say ? "noo my posts are not malicious" as if that would change your opinion

 

[Lady pompom]

What made you pick hardy? He didn't really hint much at all if I recall, I'm trying to backroad that atm to see if I missed anything

A mix on intuition plus I noticed he was very in point while questioning people, which might have poked mafias. Nobody else really stod out for me in terms of questioned that looked green enough for me besides hardy. (Even though I started with him as suspect, after reading posts, I realized he really was doing some good questioning)

 

[Kakoha]

see @Tatsumaki , things like this make me not able to beleive her nor her claim
she's trying her best to push for me with blatant lies
she's pushing for an agenda as she likes to say

 

[Lady pompom]

how is that even a question ? you just said something with no sense to it
what was I supposed to say ? "noo my posts are not malicious" as if that would change your opinion

You adress people’s accusations with facts, its not about changing my opinion, you cant even bother to justify for others. You really wanna get lynched

--- Double Post Merged, Friday at 12:11 AM, Original Post Date: Friday at 12:10 AM ---

@Kakoha

1. Why are you relating my observation that people piling votes is suspicious with my vote choice? <<<<<<<< You haven‘t answered this

 

[Kakoha]

You adress people’s accusations with facts, its not about changing my opinion, you cant even bother to justify for others. You really wanna get lynched

you didn't even accuse me with nothing, u just gave your opinion with 0 basis, I really don't think I could convince you with anything there lol

 

[Lady pompom]

You wanted pings, I’m pinging you and walking you through my posts so it;s easy for lazy mafia like you to answer, so go ahead, answer to your heart’s content and if you don’t, we will have plenty pom posts showing how you are avoiding addressing what I’m asking.

 

[Kakoha]

1. Why are you relating my observation that people piling votes is suspicious with my vote choice? <<<<<<<< You haven‘t answered this

I literally did
idc if u don't like my answer, I pinged it specifically and wrote what I think about that question

 

[Lady pompom]

you didn't even accuse me with nothing, u just gave your opinion with 0 basis, I really don't think I could convince you with anything there lol

It’s not 0 basis I’m just proving as matter of fact that all you can do is walk in circles while purposefully avoiding questions and discussing how I’m not asking anything. Broken disc, reapeat and rinse. I want answers.