We have the same dream, Pirulitokun.For the first time, four teams from South America in the quarter-finals. Now I'm just thinking about a semi-finals with only south american teams. That would be awesome.
Maybe I'm dreaming too much. But dreaming is free.
Go, South America!
I would love if Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay were the teams that will move on to the round of 4. That would be such a milestone for South American football. I know the chances of that happening are not that high, but as you said it doesn’t cost to dream. You know it is very interesting that you would mention the controversial factor in a football games. Dunga said something similar:I'm not sympathic with video technology to assist the referees. I don't know if it is because I'm used to discuss about polemics decisions and think about it as part of the game. And I can't imagine myself in football stadium without such controversial moments, even the crucial ones.
Watching on TV is too convenient and doesn't give even half of the feeling of a football match.
"I would leave it the way it is," said Brazil's coach, Dunga. "If there is no controversy in football, you wouldn't be there and I wouldn't be here."
Here’s an interesting article about it:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-...tion-open-added-ref-technology&cc=5901?ver=us
As long as it doesn’t take away from the experience and enjoyment of watching a football game and as long it doesn’t mean interrupting the flow of the game for more than a couple of minutes, I will also be in favor of a test.But it doesn't mean I'm not open to see a test. I'm not a reactionary. If the technology proves to be good for football, why not?



